Literature DB >> 21508761

Obstetric ethics: an essential dimension of planned home birth.

Frank A Chervenak1, Laurence B McCullough, Birgit Arabin.   

Abstract

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (the College) Committee Opinion, "Planned Home Birth," invokes two core concepts of obstetric ethics, the right of a woman to make a medically informed decision about delivery and the informed consent process. We set out a framework for obstetric ethics that empowers the autonomy of pregnant women by focusing on when, in beneficence-based clinical judgment, clinical management should be offered, should be recommended, and should be recommended against in the informed consent process. Using this ethical framework, we show that the College statement does not provide adequate guidance to obstetricians in fulfilling their ethical obligations in the informed consent process with pregnant women who express an interest in, or preference for planned home birth. Obstetricians have an ethical obligation to disclose the increased risks of perinatal and neonatal mortality and morbidity from planned home birth in the context of American healthcare and should recommend against it. Obstetricians should recommend hospital-based delivery and respond to refusal of these recommendations with respectful persuasion. As a matter of beneficence-based professional integrity, obstetricians should not participate in planned home birth. At the same time, obstetricians have a beneficence-based obligation to continue to provide prenatal and emergency obstetric care. The obstetric profession should continuously strive to make hospital births more humane and support home-birth-like environments in the hospital as well as continuously improve safety for both pregnant and fetal patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21508761     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182172a97

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  5 in total

1.  Autonomy in place of birth: a concept analysis.

Authors:  Berglind Halfdansdottir; Margaret E Wilson; Ingegerd Hildingsson; Olof A Olafsdottir; Alexander Kr Smarason; Herdis Sveinsdottir
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2015-11

Review 2.  Planned hospital birth versus planned home birth.

Authors:  Ole Olsen; Jette A Clausen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-09-12

3.  Increasing Liability Premiums in Obstetrics - Analysis, Effects and Options.

Authors:  P Soergel; O Schöffski; P Hillemanns; U Hille-Betz; S Kundu
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.915

4.  Out-of-hospital deliveries: A case-control study.

Authors:  Lima Diana; Lima Glaucia; Cersosimo Adriana; Figueiredo Israel
Journal:  Turk Pediatri Ars       Date:  2018-06-01

5.  Serious adverse neonatal outcomes such as 5-minute Apgar score of zero and seizures or severe neurologic dysfunction are increased in planned home births after cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Amos Grünebaum; Laurence B McCullough; Birgit Arabin; Frank A Chervenak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.