Literature DB >> 25842080

The current design of oncology phase I clinical trials: progressing from algorithms to statistical models.

Thomas M Braun1.   

Abstract

In this article we examine how phase I trial designs for anti-cancer agents have developed over the past few decades. We review the use of algorithmic, relatively non- statistical designs, and then describe nonparametric and parametric statistically-driven designs that have better operating characteristics than algorithmic designs. We then follow with a description of how the original parametric design, known as the continual reassessment method (CRM), has been generalized and expanded to create designs for many complex settings that occur in early-phase oncology trials. We conclude with a discussion of outstanding issues and controversies that continue to exist with phase I trial designs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dose-finding; dose-limiting toxicity (DLT); maximum tolerated dose (MTD)

Year:  2014        PMID: 25842080     DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2304-3865.2014.02.01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2304-3865


  15 in total

1.  Performance of toxicity probability interval based designs in contrast to the continual reassessment method.

Authors:  Bethany Jablonski Horton; Nolan A Wages; Mark R Conaway
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Cancer drug development: The missing links.

Authors:  Ajaikumar B Kunnumakkara; Devivasha Bordoloi; Bethsebie Lalduhsaki Sailo; Nand Kishor Roy; Krishan Kumar Thakur; Kishore Banik; Mehdi Shakibaei; Subash C Gupta; Bharat B Aggarwal
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2019-04-08

3.  Adaptive clinical trial designs in oncology.

Authors:  Yong Zang; J Jack Lee
Journal:  Chin Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12

4.  A Phase I/II adaptive design to determine the optimal treatment regimen from a set of combination immunotherapies in high-risk melanoma.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Craig L Slingluff; Gina R Petroni
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  Dose-response relationship between local anesthetic volume and hemidiaphragmatic paresis following ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus blockade.

Authors:  Tiffany R Tedore; Hannah X Lin; Kane O Pryor; Virginia E Tangel; Daniel J Pak; Michael Akerman; David S Wellman; Hannah Oden-Brunson
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 6.288

6.  A Phase I/II adaptive design for heterogeneous groups with application to a stereotactic body radiation therapy trial.

Authors:  Nolan A Wages; Paul W Read; Gina R Petroni
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 1.894

7.  Selection of the initial design for the two-stage continual reassessment method.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Jia; Anastasia Ivanova; Shing M Lee
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 1.051

8.  Motivating sample sizes in adaptive Phase I trials via Bayesian posterior credible intervals.

Authors:  Thomas M Braun
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 1.701

9.  Logistic retainment interval dose exploration design for Phase I clinical trials of cytotoxic agents.

Authors:  Thomas A Murray
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 1.234

10.  A simulation-free approach to assessing the performance of the continual reassessment method.

Authors:  Thomas M Braun
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.