OBJECTIVES: To evaluate radiation dose, image quality, and optimal level of sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) of cerebral CT angiography (CTA) at 70 kVp. METHODS:One hundred patients were prospectively classified into two groups: Group A (n = 50), 70 kVp cerebral CTA with 5 levels of SAFIRE reconstruction (S1-S5); and Group B (n = 50), 120 kVp with filtered back projection (FBP) reconstruction. CT attenuation values, noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the internal carotid artery (ICA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA) were measured. Subjective image quality was evaluated. Effective dose (ED) was estimated. RESULTS:CT attenuation and noise of the ICA and MCA in Group A were higher than those of Group B (all P < 0.001) while the SNRICA, SNRMCA, CNRICA, and CNRMCA of Group A at S4-5 were comparable to (P > 0.05) or higher than in Group B (P < 0.05). There was no difference in overall image quality between Group A S3-5 and Group B (P > 0.05). ED was 0.2 ± 0.0 mSv for Group A with 85 % ED reduction in comparison to Group B (1.3 ± 0.2 mSv). CONCLUSION: Cerebral CTA at 70 kVp is feasible, allowing for substantial radiation dose reduction. SAFIRE S4 level is recommended for obtaining optimal image quality. KEY POINTS: • 70 kVp cerebral CTA is feasible and provides diagnostic image quality. • 70 kVp cerebral CTA resulted in 85% effective dose reduction. • S4 level of SAFIRE is recommended for 70 kVp cerebral CTA.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate radiation dose, image quality, and optimal level of sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) of cerebral CT angiography (CTA) at 70 kVp. METHODS: One hundred patients were prospectively classified into two groups: Group A (n = 50), 70 kVp cerebral CTA with 5 levels of SAFIRE reconstruction (S1-S5); and Group B (n = 50), 120 kVp with filtered back projection (FBP) reconstruction. CT attenuation values, noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the internal carotid artery (ICA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA) were measured. Subjective image quality was evaluated. Effective dose (ED) was estimated. RESULTS: CT attenuation and noise of the ICA and MCA in Group A were higher than those of Group B (all P < 0.001) while the SNRICA, SNRMCA, CNRICA, and CNRMCA of Group A at S4-5 were comparable to (P > 0.05) or higher than in Group B (P < 0.05). There was no difference in overall image quality between Group A S3-5 and Group B (P > 0.05). ED was 0.2 ± 0.0 mSv for Group A with 85 % ED reduction in comparison to Group B (1.3 ± 0.2 mSv). CONCLUSION: Cerebral CTA at 70 kVp is feasible, allowing for substantial radiation dose reduction. SAFIRE S4 level is recommended for obtaining optimal image quality. KEY POINTS: • 70 kVp cerebral CTA is feasible and provides diagnostic image quality. • 70 kVp cerebral CTA resulted in 85% effective dose reduction. • S4 level of SAFIRE is recommended for 70 kVp cerebral CTA.
Authors: Priyanka Prakash; Mannudeep K Kalra; Jeanne B Ackman; Subba R Digumarthy; Jiang Hsieh; Synho Do; Jo-Anne O Shepard; Matthew D Gilman Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Priyanka Prakash; Mannudeep K Kalra; Avinash K Kambadakone; Homer Pien; Jiang Hsieh; Michael A Blake; Dushyant V Sahani Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Holger Haubenreisser; Christian Fink; John W Nance; Martin Sedlmair; Bernhard Schmidt; Stefan O Schoenberg; Thomas Henzler Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2014-02-07 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Sarabjeet Singh; Mannudeep K Kalra; Jiang Hsieh; Paul E Licato; Synho Do; Homer H Pien; Michael A Blake Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-09-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Wei-Hua Yin; Bin Lu; Nan Li; Lei Han; Zhi-Hui Hou; Run-Ze Wu; Yong-Jian Wu; Hong-Xia Niu; Shi-Liang Jiang; Aleksander W Krazinski; Ullrich Ebersberger; Felix G Meinel; U Joseph Schoepf Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-10-23
Authors: Mahesh V Jayaraman; William W Mayo-Smith; Glenn A Tung; Richard A Haas; Jeffrey M Rogg; Neerav R Mehta; Curtis E Doberstein Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-12-29 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Xiao Kun Fang; Qian Qian Ni; U Joseph Schoepf; Chang Sheng Zhou; Guo Zhong Chen; Song Luo; Stephen R Fuller; Carlo N De Cecco; Long Jiang Zhang; Guang Ming Lu Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-02-06 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: A Eller; M Wiesmüller; W Wüst; R Heiss; M Kopp; M Saake; M Brand; M Uder; M M May Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-07-11 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Su Young Yun; Young Jin Heo; Hae Woong Jeong; Jin Wook Baek; Hye Jung Choo; Gi Won Shin; Sung Tae Kim; Young Gyun Jeong; Ji Young Lee; Hyun Seok Jung Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2019-01-25 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Robert Forbrig; Lucas L Geyer; Robert Stahl; Jun Thorsteinsdottir; Christian Schichor; Friedrich-Wilhelm Kreth; Maximilian Patzig; Moriz Herzberg; Thomas Liebig; Franziska Dorn; Christoph G Trumm Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-01-11 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Q Q Ni; G Z Chen; U J Schoepf; M A J Klitsie; C N De Cecco; C S Zhou; S Luo; G M Lu; L J Zhang Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-05-05 Impact factor: 3.825