Q Q Ni1, G Z Chen1, U J Schoepf2, M A J Klitsie2, C N De Cecco2, C S Zhou1, S Luo1, G M Lu1, L J Zhang3. 1. From the Department of Medical Imaging (Q.Q.N., G.Z.C., C.S.Z., S.L., G.M.L., L.J.Z.), Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China. 2. Department of Radiology and Radiological Science (U.J.S., M.A.J.K., C.N.D.C.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina. 3. From the Department of Medical Imaging (Q.Q.N., G.Z.C., C.S.Z., S.L., G.M.L., L.J.Z.), Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China kevinzhlj@163.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Multidetector row CTA has become the primary imaging technique for detecting intracranial aneurysms. Technical progress enables the use of cerebral CTA with lower radiation doses and contrast media. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of 80-kV(peak) cerebral CTA with 30 mL of contrast agent for detecting intracranial aneurysms. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Two hundred four patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. Patients in group A (n = 102) underwent 80-kVpCTA with 30 mL of contrast agent, while patients in group B (n = 102) underwent conventional CTA (120 kVp, 60 mL of contrast agent). All patients underwent DSA. Image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and radiation dose between the 2 groups were compared. RESULTS:Diagnostic image quality was obtained in 100 and 99 patients in groups A and B, respectively (P = .65). With DSA as reference standard, diagnostic accuracy on a per-aneurysm basis was 89.9% for group A and 93.9% for group B. For evaluating smaller aneurysms (<3 mm), the diagnostic accuracy of groups A and B was 86.3% and 90.8%, respectively. There was no difference in diagnostic accuracy between each CTA group and DSA (all, P > .05) or between the 2 CTA groups (all, P > .05). The effective dose in group A was reduced by 72.7% compared with group B. CONCLUSIONS: In detecting intracranial aneurysms with substantial radiation dose and contrast agent reduction, 80-kVp/30-mL contrast CTA provides the same diagnostic accuracy as conventional CTA.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Multidetector row CTA has become the primary imaging technique for detecting intracranial aneurysms. Technical progress enables the use of cerebral CTA with lower radiation doses and contrast media. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of 80-kV(peak) cerebral CTA with 30 mL of contrast agent for detecting intracranial aneurysms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred four patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. Patients in group A (n = 102) underwent 80-kVp CTA with 30 mL of contrast agent, while patients in group B (n = 102) underwent conventional CTA (120 kVp, 60 mL of contrast agent). All patients underwent DSA. Image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and radiation dose between the 2 groups were compared. RESULTS: Diagnostic image quality was obtained in 100 and 99 patients in groups A and B, respectively (P = .65). With DSA as reference standard, diagnostic accuracy on a per-aneurysm basis was 89.9% for group A and 93.9% for group B. For evaluating smaller aneurysms (<3 mm), the diagnostic accuracy of groups A and B was 86.3% and 90.8%, respectively. There was no difference in diagnostic accuracy between each CTA group and DSA (all, P > .05) or between the 2 CTA groups (all, P > .05). The effective dose in group A was reduced by 72.7% compared with group B. CONCLUSIONS: In detecting intracranial aneurysms with substantial radiation dose and contrast agent reduction, 80-kVp/30-mL contrast CTA provides the same diagnostic accuracy as conventional CTA.
Authors: Li Lu; Long Jiang Zhang; Colin S Poon; Sheng Yong Wu; Chang Sheng Zhou; Song Luo; Mei Wang; Guang Ming Lu Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-12-05 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Lucas L Geyer; U Joseph Schoepf; Felix G Meinel; John W Nance; Gorka Bastarrika; Jonathon A Leipsic; Narinder S Paul; Marco Rengo; Andrea Laghi; Carlo N De Cecco Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: A Korn; B Bender; M Fenchel; D Spira; C Schabel; C Thomas; T Flohr; C D Claussen; R Bhadelia; U Ernemann; H Brodoefel Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2013-04-12 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Antonio Moscariello; Richard A P Takx; U Joseph Schoepf; Matthias Renker; Peter L Zwerner; Terrence X O'Brien; Thomas Allmendinger; Sebastian Vogt; Bernhard Schmidt; Giancarlo Savino; Christian Fink; Lorenzo Bonomo; Thomas Henzler Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-05-25 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Cynthia H McCollough; Andrew N Primak; Natalie Braun; James Kofler; Lifeng Yu; Jodie Christner Journal: Radiol Clin North Am Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 2.303
Authors: Robert Forbrig; Lucas L Geyer; Robert Stahl; Jun Thorsteinsdottir; Christian Schichor; Friedrich-Wilhelm Kreth; Maximilian Patzig; Moriz Herzberg; Thomas Liebig; Franziska Dorn; Christoph G Trumm Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-01-11 Impact factor: 5.315