Susan B Bressler1, Allison R Edwards2, Christopher M Andreoli3, Paul Andrew Edwards4, Adam R Glassman2, Glenn J Jaffe5, Michele Melia2, Jennifer K Sun6. 1. Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. 2. Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL, USA. 3. Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates, Harvard Medical School, Department of Ophthalmology, Boston, MA, USA. 4. Henry Ford Health System, Department of Ophthalmology and Eye Care Services. 5. Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. 6. Department of Ophthalmology, Joslin Diabetes Center, Beetham Eye Institute, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the reproducibility of central subfield thickness (CST) and volume measurements from optical coherence tomography (OCT) images obtained with Zeiss Stratus and Optovue RTVue, and formulate equations to convert these measurements from RTVue to 'equivalent' Stratus values. METHODS: Cross-sectional observational study from 309 eyes of 167 participants with diabetes and at least one eye with central-involved diabetic macular edema (DME; Stratus CST ≥ 250 μm) that underwent two replicate Stratus scans followed by two replicate RTVue scans centered on the fovea. RESULTS: The Bland-Altman coefficient of repeatability for relative change in CST (the degree of change that could be expected from measurement variability) was not significantly different on Stratus and RTVue scans (10% and 16%, respectively). The replicate Stratus CST was within 10% of the initial Stratus measurement 93% of the time; the CST conversion equation predicted a Stratus value calculated from the observed RTVue value within 10% of the observed Stratus thickness 91% of the time. Bland-Altman limit of agreement for relative change in CST between measurements observed on different machines was 23%, comparing predicted versus actual Stratus measurement. CONCLUSIONS: RTVue thickness reproducibility appears similar to Stratus. Conversion equations to transform RTVue measurements to Stratus-equivalent values within 10% of the observed Stratus RT are feasible. CST changes greater than 10% when using the same machine or 20% when switching from Stratus to RTVue, after conversion to Stratus equivalents, are likely due to a true change beyond measurement error. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Conversion equations to translate central retinal thickness measurements between OCT instruments is critical to clinical trials.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the reproducibility of central subfield thickness (CST) and volume measurements from optical coherence tomography (OCT) images obtained with Zeiss Stratus and Optovue RTVue, and formulate equations to convert these measurements from RTVue to 'equivalent' Stratus values. METHODS: Cross-sectional observational study from 309 eyes of 167 participants with diabetes and at least one eye with central-involved diabetic macular edema (DME; Stratus CST ≥ 250 μm) that underwent two replicate Stratus scans followed by two replicate RTVue scans centered on the fovea. RESULTS: The Bland-Altman coefficient of repeatability for relative change in CST (the degree of change that could be expected from measurement variability) was not significantly different on Stratus and RTVue scans (10% and 16%, respectively). The replicate Stratus CST was within 10% of the initial Stratus measurement 93% of the time; the CST conversion equation predicted a Stratus value calculated from the observed RTVue value within 10% of the observed Stratus thickness 91% of the time. Bland-Altman limit of agreement for relative change in CST between measurements observed on different machines was 23%, comparing predicted versus actual Stratus measurement. CONCLUSIONS: RTVue thickness reproducibility appears similar to Stratus. Conversion equations to transform RTVue measurements to Stratus-equivalent values within 10% of the observed Stratus RT are feasible. CST changes greater than 10% when using the same machine or 20% when switching from Stratus to RTVue, after conversion to Stratus equivalents, are likely due to a true change beyond measurement error. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Conversion equations to translate central retinal thickness measurements between OCT instruments is critical to clinical trials.
Authors: Sara Modjtahedi; Christine Chiou; Bobeck Modjtahedi; David G Telander; Lawrence S Morse; Susanna S Park Journal: Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Date: 2010 May-Jun
Authors: Magdalena G Krzystolik; Samara F Strauber; Lloyd Paul Aiello; Roy W Beck; Brian B Berger; Neil M Bressler; David J Browning; Robert B Chambers; Ronald P Danis; Matthew D Davis; Adam R Glassman; Victor H Gonzalez; Paul B Greenberg; Jeffrey G Gross; Judy E Kim; Craig Kollman Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2007-03-13 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Joseph Googe; Alexander J Brucker; Neil M Bressler; Haijing Qin; Lloyd P Aiello; Andrew Antoszyk; Roy W Beck; Susan B Bressler; Frederick L Ferris; Adam R Glassman; Dennis Marcus; Cynthia R Stockdale Journal: Retina Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Joseph Ho; Alan C Sull; Laurel N Vuong; Yueli Chen; Jonathan Liu; James G Fujimoto; Joel S Schuman; Jay S Duker Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2009-07-09 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Ute E K Wolf-Schnurrbusch; Lala Ceklic; Christian K Brinkmann; Milko E Iliev; Manuel Frey; Simon P Rothenbuehler; Volker Enzmann; Sebastian Wolf Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2009-02-21 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Susan B Bressler; Allison R Edwards; Kakarla V Chalam; Neil M Bressler; Adam R Glassman; Glenn J Jaffe; Michele Melia; David D Saggau; Oren Z Plous Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Oliver Comyn; Ling Zhi Heng; Felicia Ikeji; Kanom Bibi; Philip G Hykin; James W Bainbridge; Praveen J Patel Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-11-21 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Bliss Elizabeth O'Bryhim; Rajendra S Apte; Nathan Kung; Dean Coble; Gregory P Van Stavern Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2018-11-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Danuta M Sampson; Noha Ali; Alex Au Yong; Rumaanah Jeewa; Saumya Rajgopal; Deepaysh D C S Dutt; Sharaf Mohamed; Shehata Mohamed; Alex Hansen; Moreno Menghini; Fred K Chen Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2020-02-12 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Xi Chen; Vincent Tai; Brendan McGeehan; Gui-Shuang Ying; Christian Viehland; Ryan Imperio; Katrina P Winter; William Raynor; Du Tran-Viet; Shwetha Mangalesh; Maureen G Maguire; Cynthia A Toth Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 3.283