AIM: Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD OCT) is of increasing importance and is gradually replacing time domain OCT (TD OCT). Our aim was to determine a formula to convert Stratus OCT (TD OCT) to Cirrus OCT (SD OCT) retinal thickness. METHODS: Central retinal thickness (CRT) and retinal volume (RV) were obtained by the macular thickness program of Stratus OCT and the cube 512 × 128 program of Cirrus OCT in patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Algorithm line failures were corrected. A linear model with Stratus OCT CRT as fixed factor and Cirrus OCT CRT as dependent variable was applied to calculate the conversion formula. RESULTS: OCT examinations of 104 eyes of 104 patients were reviewed and corrected when necessary. Stratus and Cirrus OCT CRT were significantly correlated (p<0.0001). For CRT the formula Cirrus CRT=58.63+0.94 × Stratus CRT was calculated. The correlation was significantly influenced by the height of the CRT values (p<0.0001), but not by whether correction was necessary. For RV the formula Cirrus OCT RV=3.098+0.98 × Stratus OCT RV was calculated. CONCLUSION: Stratus OCT and Cirrus OCT use a different posterior reference line within the hyper-reflective band of the outer retina. Therefore a conversion formula is necessary to compare Stratus and Cirrus OCT CRT values, and this has been determined in our study.
AIM: Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD OCT) is of increasing importance and is gradually replacing time domain OCT (TD OCT). Our aim was to determine a formula to convert Stratus OCT (TD OCT) to Cirrus OCT (SD OCT) retinal thickness. METHODS: Central retinal thickness (CRT) and retinal volume (RV) were obtained by the macular thickness program of Stratus OCT and the cube 512 × 128 program of Cirrus OCT in patients with exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Algorithm line failures were corrected. A linear model with Stratus OCT CRT as fixed factor and Cirrus OCT CRT as dependent variable was applied to calculate the conversion formula. RESULTS: OCT examinations of 104 eyes of 104 patients were reviewed and corrected when necessary. Stratus and Cirrus OCT CRT were significantly correlated (p<0.0001). For CRT the formula Cirrus CRT=58.63+0.94 × Stratus CRT was calculated. The correlation was significantly influenced by the height of the CRT values (p<0.0001), but not by whether correction was necessary. For RV the formula Cirrus OCT RV=3.098+0.98 × Stratus OCT RV was calculated. CONCLUSION: Stratus OCT and Cirrus OCT use a different posterior reference line within the hyper-reflective band of the outer retina. Therefore a conversion formula is necessary to compare Stratus and Cirrus OCT CRT values, and this has been determined in our study.
Authors: Susan B Bressler; Allison R Edwards; Kakarla V Chalam; Neil M Bressler; Adam R Glassman; Glenn J Jaffe; Michele Melia; David D Saggau; Oren Z Plous Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Susan B Bressler; Allison R Edwards; Christopher M Andreoli; Paul Andrew Edwards; Adam R Glassman; Glenn J Jaffe; Michele Melia; Jennifer K Sun Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2015-01-22 Impact factor: 3.283