Literature DB >> 17570291

Addressing severe bone deficiency: what a cage will not do.

Wayne G Paprosky1, Scott S Sporer, Brian P Murphy.   

Abstract

Managing severe acetabular bone loss in total hip arthroplasty revision can be a tremendous challenge. Osteolysis and migration of the acetabular component can lead to large uncontained defects. Traditionally, these deficiencies have been treated with allograft with or without the support of a cage. In severe cases, a majority of the cage support is via allograft instead of host bone. Sometimes, with remodeling and resorption of the allograft, the cage can lose structural support, leading to fatigue and failure. In these situations, trabecular metal has become a viable alternative. Deficiencies of acetabular bone can be independently addressed and reconstructed providing initial stability and, we believe, long-term biologic fixation to host bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17570291     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.01.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  17 in total

1.  [Mega cups and partial pelvic replacement].

Authors:  R von Eisenhart-Rothe; H Gollwitzer; A Toepfer; H Pilge; B M Holzapfel; H Rechl; R Gradinger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  The augment-and-modular-cage revision system for reconstruction of severe acetabular defects-two-year clinical and radiographic results.

Authors:  Philip P Roessler; Max Jaenisch; Manuel Kuhlmann; Miriam Wacker; P Johannes Wagenhäuser; Sascha Gravius; Dieter C Wirtz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  [Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision surgery of the hip. Autologous, homologous or metal?].

Authors:  S Gravius; G Pagenstert; O Weber; N Kraska; H Röhrig; D C Wirtz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  [Standardized reconstruction of acetabular bone defects using the cranial socket system].

Authors:  Maximilian Rudert; Boris Michael Holzapfel; Florian Kratzer; Reiner Gradinger
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.154

5.  Acetabular revision arthroplasty using trabecular titanium implants.

Authors:  Boris Steno; Milan Kokavec; Libor Necas
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  [Biological acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty using impaction bone grafting and an acetabular reconstruction ring].

Authors:  M J Friedrich; S Gravius; J Schmolders; M D Wimmer; D C Wirtz
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 1.154

7.  Do revision total hip augments provide appropriate modularity?

Authors:  Matthew G Teeter; Douglas D R Naudie; James L Howard; Richard W McCalden; Steven J MacDonald
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Custom Acetabular Cages Offer Stable Fixation and Improved Hip Scores for Revision THA With Severe Bone Defects.

Authors:  Huiwu Li; Xinhua Qu; Yuanqing Mao; Kerong Dai; Zhenan Zhu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty with a modular revision system and biological defect augmentation.

Authors:  Jan Schmolders; Max J Friedrich; Robert D Michel; Thomas M Randau; Matthias D Wimmer; Andreas C Strauss; Hendrik Kohlhof; Dieter C Wirtz; Sascha Gravius
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-10-04       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  [Acetabular reinforcement rings in revision total hip arthroplasty: midterm results in 298 cases].

Authors:  U J Schlegel; R G Bitsch; M Pritsch; P R Aldinger; H Mau; S J Breusch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.