Ousmane Faye1, Pierre-Yves Boëlle2, Emmanuel Heleze3, Oumar Faye1, Cheikh Loucoubar1, N'Faly Magassouba4, Barré Soropogui4, Sakoba Keita5, Tata Gakou5, El Hadji Ibrahima Bah6, Lamine Koivogui7, Amadou Alpha Sall8, Simon Cauchemez9. 1. Arbovirus and Viral Hemorrhagic Fever Unit, Institut Pasteur de Dakar, Dakar, Senegal. 2. INSERM, U1136, Paris, France; Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Paris 06, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France. 3. Ministry of Health, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire. 4. Projet de fièvres hémorragiques de Guinée, Université Gamal Abdel Nasser, Conakry, Guinea. 5. Ministry of Health, Conakry, Guinea. 6. Service des maladies infectieuses, Hopital Donka, Conakry, Guinea. 7. Institut National de Santé Publique de Guinée, Conakry, Guinea. 8. Arbovirus and Viral Hemorrhagic Fever Unit, Institut Pasteur de Dakar, Dakar, Senegal. Electronic address: asall@pasteur.sn. 9. Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases Unit, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France. Electronic address: simon.cauchemez@pasteur.fr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An epidemic of Ebola virus disease of unprecedented size continues in parts of west Africa. For the first time, large urban centres such as Conakry, the capital of Guinea, are affected. We did an observational study of patients with Ebola virus disease in three regions of Guinea, including Conakry, aiming to map the routes of transmission and assess the effect of interventions. METHODS: Between Feb 10, 2014, and Aug 25, 2014, we obtained data from the linelist of all confirmed and probable cases in Guinea (as of Sept 16, 2014), a laboratory database of information about patients, and interviews with patients and their families and neighbours. With this information, we mapped chains of transmission, identified which setting infections most probably originated from (community, hospitals, or funerals), and computed the context-specific and overall reproduction numbers. FINDINGS: Of 193 confirmed and probable cases of Ebola virus disease reported in Conakry, Boffa, and Télimélé, 152 (79%) were positioned in chains of transmission. Health-care workers contributed little to transmission. In March, 2014, individuals with Ebola virus disease who were not health-care workers infected a mean of 2·3 people (95% CI 1·6-3·2): 1·4 (0·9-2·2) in the community, 0·4 (0·1-0·9) in hospitals, and 0·5 (0·2-1·0) at funerals. After the implementation of infection control in April, the reproduction number in hospitals and at funerals reduced to lower than 0·1. In the community, the reproduction number dropped by 50% for patients that were admitted to hospital, but remained unchanged for those that were not. In March, hospital transmissions constituted 35% (seven of 20) of all transmissions and funeral transmissions constituted 15% (three); but from April to the end of the study period, they constituted only 9% (11 of 128) and 4% (five), respectively. 82% (119 of 145) of transmission occurred in the community and 72% (105) between family members. Our simulations show that a 10% increase in hospital admissions could have reduced the length of chains by 26% (95% CI 4-45). INTERPRETATION: In Conakry, interventions had the potential to stop the epidemic, but reintroductions of the disease and poor cooperation of a few families led to prolonged low-level spread, showing the challenges of Ebola virus disease control in large urban centres. Monitoring of chains of transmission is crucial to assess and optimise local control strategies for Ebola virus disease. FUNDING: Labex IBEID, Reacting, PREDEMICS, NIGMS MIDAS initiative, Institut Pasteur de Dakar.
BACKGROUND: An epidemic of Ebola virus disease of unprecedented size continues in parts of west Africa. For the first time, large urban centres such as Conakry, the capital of Guinea, are affected. We did an observational study of patients with Ebola virus disease in three regions of Guinea, including Conakry, aiming to map the routes of transmission and assess the effect of interventions. METHODS: Between Feb 10, 2014, and Aug 25, 2014, we obtained data from the linelist of all confirmed and probable cases in Guinea (as of Sept 16, 2014), a laboratory database of information about patients, and interviews with patients and their families and neighbours. With this information, we mapped chains of transmission, identified which setting infections most probably originated from (community, hospitals, or funerals), and computed the context-specific and overall reproduction numbers. FINDINGS: Of 193 confirmed and probable cases of Ebola virus disease reported in Conakry, Boffa, and Télimélé, 152 (79%) were positioned in chains of transmission. Health-care workers contributed little to transmission. In March, 2014, individuals with Ebola virus disease who were not health-care workers infected a mean of 2·3 people (95% CI 1·6-3·2): 1·4 (0·9-2·2) in the community, 0·4 (0·1-0·9) in hospitals, and 0·5 (0·2-1·0) at funerals. After the implementation of infection control in April, the reproduction number in hospitals and at funerals reduced to lower than 0·1. In the community, the reproduction number dropped by 50% for patients that were admitted to hospital, but remained unchanged for those that were not. In March, hospital transmissions constituted 35% (seven of 20) of all transmissions and funeral transmissions constituted 15% (three); but from April to the end of the study period, they constituted only 9% (11 of 128) and 4% (five), respectively. 82% (119 of 145) of transmission occurred in the community and 72% (105) between family members. Our simulations show that a 10% increase in hospital admissions could have reduced the length of chains by 26% (95% CI 4-45). INTERPRETATION: In Conakry, interventions had the potential to stop the epidemic, but reintroductions of the disease and poor cooperation of a few families led to prolonged low-level spread, showing the challenges of Ebola virus disease control in large urban centres. Monitoring of chains of transmission is crucial to assess and optimise local control strategies for Ebola virus disease. FUNDING: Labex IBEID, Reacting, PREDEMICS, NIGMS MIDAS initiative, Institut Pasteur de Dakar.
Authors: Marcelo F C Gomes; Ana Pastore Y Piontti; Luca Rossi; Dennis Chao; Ira Longini; M Elizabeth Halloran; Alessandro Vespignani Journal: PLoS Curr Date: 2014-09-02
Authors: Abhishek Pandey; Katherine E Atkins; Jan Medlock; Natasha Wenzel; Jeffrey P Townsend; James E Childs; Tolbert G Nyenswah; Martial L Ndeffo-Mbah; Alison P Galvani Journal: Science Date: 2014-10-30 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Christopher J M Whitty; Jeremy Farrar; Neil Ferguson; W John Edmunds; Peter Piot; Melissa Leach; Sally C Davies Journal: Nature Date: 2014-11-13 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Bruce Aylward; Philippe Barboza; Luke Bawo; Eric Bertherat; Pepe Bilivogui; Isobel Blake; Rick Brennan; Sylvie Briand; Jethro Magwati Chakauya; Kennedy Chitala; Roland M Conteh; Anne Cori; Alice Croisier; Jean-Marie Dangou; Boubacar Diallo; Christl A Donnelly; Christopher Dye; Tim Eckmanns; Neil M Ferguson; Pierre Formenty; Caroline Fuhrer; Keiji Fukuda; Tini Garske; Alex Gasasira; Stephen Gbanyan; Peter Graaff; Emmanuel Heleze; Amara Jambai; Thibaut Jombart; Francis Kasolo; Albert Mbule Kadiobo; Sakoba Keita; Daniel Kertesz; Moussa Koné; Chris Lane; Jered Markoff; Moses Massaquoi; Harriet Mills; John Mike Mulba; Emmanuel Musa; Joel Myhre; Abdusalam Nasidi; Eric Nilles; Pierre Nouvellet; Deo Nshimirimana; Isabelle Nuttall; Tolbert Nyenswah; Olushayo Olu; Scott Pendergast; William Perea; Jonathan Polonsky; Steven Riley; Olivier Ronveaux; Keita Sakoba; Ravi Santhana Gopala Krishnan; Mikiko Senga; Faisal Shuaib; Maria D Van Kerkhove; Rui Vaz; Niluka Wijekoon Kannangarage; Zabulon Yoti Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-09-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Laura A Skrip; Mosoka P Fallah; Stephen G Gaffney; Rami Yaari; Dan Yamin; Amit Huppert; Luke Bawo; Tolbert Nyenswah; Alison P Galvani Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2017-05-26 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Li-Qun Fang; Yang Yang; Jia-Fu Jiang; Hong-Wu Yao; David Kargbo; Xin-Lou Li; Bao-Gui Jiang; Brima Kargbo; Yi-Gang Tong; Ya-Wei Wang; Kun Liu; Abdul Kamara; Foday Dafae; Alex Kanu; Rui-Ruo Jiang; Ye Sun; Ruo-Xi Sun; Wan-Jun Chen; Mai-Juan Ma; Natalie E Dean; Harold Thomas; Ira M Longini; M Elizabeth Halloran; Wu-Chun Cao Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-03-28 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Henrik Salje; Justin Lessler; Kishor Kumar Paul; Andrew S Azman; M Waliur Rahman; Mahmudur Rahman; Derek Cummings; Emily S Gurley; Simon Cauchemez Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-11-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Sarah V Leavitt; Robyn S Lee; Paola Sebastiani; C Robert Horsburgh; Helen E Jenkins; Laura F White Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Ronan F Arthur; Emily S Gurley; Henrik Salje; Laura S P Bloomfield; James H Jones Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2017-05-05 Impact factor: 6.237
Authors: Gary Wong; Xiangguo Qiu; Marc-Antoine de La Vega; Lisa Fernando; Haiyan Wei; Alexander Bello; Hugues Fausther-Bovendo; Jonathan Audet; Andrea Kroeker; Robert Kozak; Kaylie Tran; Shihua He; Kevin Tierney; Geoff Soule; Estella Moffat; Stephan Günther; George F Gao; Jim Strong; Carissa Embury-Hyatt; Gary Kobinger Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2016-09-19 Impact factor: 5.226