Literature DB >> 33818754

Pitfalls and challenges in genetic test interpretation: An exploration of genetic professionals experience with interpretation of results.

Katherine E Donohue1, Catherine Gooch2,3, Alexander Katz4, Jessica Wakelee5, Anne Slavotinek6, Bruce R Korf2.   

Abstract

The interpretation of genetic testing results is subject to error. This observational study illustrates examples of pitfalls and challenges in interpretation of genetic testing results as reported by genetics professionals. We surveyed genetics professionals to describe interpretation challenges, the types of variants that were involved, and the reported clinical impact of misconception of a test result. Case studies were then collected from a select group to further explore potential causes of misunderstanding. A total of 83% of survey respondents were aware of at least one instance of genetic test misinterpretation. Both professionals with and without formal training in genetics were challenged by test reports, and variants of unknown significance were most frequently involved. Case submissions revealed that interpretation pitfalls extend beyond variant classification analyses. Inferred challenges in case submissions include lack of genetic counseling, unclear wording of reports, and suboptimal communication among providers. Respondents and case submitters noted that incorrect interpretation can trigger unnecessary follow-up tests and improperly alter clinical management. Further research is needed to validate and quantify large-scale data regarding challenges of genetic results interpretation.
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  genetic counseling; genetic results; medical error; medical genetics; misinterpretation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33818754      PMCID: PMC8489659          DOI: 10.1111/cge.13917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.296


  56 in total

1.  Improving Molecular Genetic Test Utilization through Order Restriction, Test Review, and Guidance.

Authors:  Jacquelyn D Riley; Gary W Procop; Kandice Kottke-Marchant; Robert Wyllie; Felicitas L Lacbawan
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 5.568

2.  Adverse events in cancer genetic testing: the third case series.

Authors:  Danielle C Bonadies; Karina L Brierley; Rachel E Barnett; Melanie D Baxter; Talia Donenberg; Whitney L Ducaine; Michelle E Ernst; Michelle E Ernstx; Jeanne Homer; Megan Judkins; Niki M Lovick; Jacquelyn M Powers; Christine Stanislaw; Elizabeth Stark; Rio C Stenner; Ellen T Matloff
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.360

3.  Coordination of Genetic Care: More Important and Complicated Than it Seems.

Authors:  Suzanne M Mahon
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 11.908

4.  Genetic Counseling Service Delivery Models in the United States: Assessment of changes in use from 2010 to 2017.

Authors:  Samantha E Greenberg; Emily Boothe; Christine L Delaney; Ryan Noss; Stephanie A Cohen
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Clinical models of telehealth in genetics: A regional telegenetics landscape.

Authors:  Alissa B Terry; Amanda Wylie; Melissa Raspa; Beth Vogel; Kunal Sanghavi; Luba Djurdjinovic; Michele Caggana; Joann Bodurtha
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-03-02       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  The impact of raw DNA availability and corresponding online interpretation services: A mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Caitlin G Allen; Jazmine Gabriel; Maureen Flynn; Tricia N Cunningham; Catharine Wang
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Genetics education in medical school: a qualitative study exploring educational experiences and needs.

Authors:  Deanna E Telner; June C Carroll; Yves Talbot
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.650

8.  Retention of medical genetics knowledge and skills by medical students.

Authors:  Anne E Greb; Simone Brennan; Lori McParlane; Renee Page; Patrick D Bridge
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 9.  Mainstreaming genetics and genomics: a systematic review of the barriers and facilitators for nurses and physicians in secondary and tertiary care.

Authors:  Stephanie White; Chris Jacobs; Jane Phillips
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Are providers prepared for genomic medicine: interpretation of Direct-to-Consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) results and genetic self-efficacy by medical professionals.

Authors:  Scott P McGrath; Nephi Walton; Marc S Williams; Katherine K Kim; Kiran Bastola
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Experiences of individuals with a variant of uncertain significance on genetic testing for hereditary cancer risks: a mixed method systematic review.

Authors:  Danielle Gould; Rachel Walker; Grace Makari-Judson; Memnun Seven
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-07-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.