Literature DB >> 24155015

The value of a genetic counselor: improving identification of cancer genetic counseling patients with chart review.

Jennifer N Eichmeyer1, Christa Burnham, Patty Sproat, Rick Tivis, Thomas M Beck.   

Abstract

Advances in genetics are changing cancer care and requiring institutions to maximize the unique skills of genetics professionals. The identification of genetic syndromes is vital for prevention and management of families with high cancer risks. Despite this, high risk individuals who qualify are often not referred. Genetic counselors could review oncology charts to improve identification. A genetics assessment tool developed by NCI Community Cancer Centers Program was used to perform self-assessment of the genetics program. A weekly report of all new oncology patients was provided to a genetic counselor for chart review. In 2010, 58 % of all eligible patients (n = 152) were offered a genetics evaluation. In 2011 this improved to 70 % (n = 167), which was a statistically significant difference, X (2)(1) = 5.13, p = 0.02. By cancer site, ovarian cancer referrals also showed statistically significant improvement, X (2)(1) = 6.36, p = 0.01. Breast and colon referrals were improved but not significant. Over 10 months, 129 patients were identified through the chart review program. Three were confirmed to have a genetic mutation for a hereditary cancer syndrome. An average week included review of 73 charts for 10 medical oncologists, 4 radiation oncologists, and 4 pediatric oncologists which generated 60-80 min of work for the genetic counselor. This program improved patient identification and quality, and allowed physicians to become more aware of opportunities for genetic counseling and more patients to receive genetic counseling and testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24155015     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-013-9664-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  24 in total

1.  Family history and women with ovarian cancer: is it asked and does it matter?: An observational study.

Authors:  Anne Lanceley; Zara Eagle; Gemma Ogden; Sue Gessler; Khalil Razvi; Jonathan A Ledermann; Lucy Side
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 2.  Genetic risk assessment and BRCA mutation testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Identification and referral of families at high risk for cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  Kevin M Sweet; Terry L Bradley; Judith A Westman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Reported referral for genetic counseling or BRCA 1/2 testing among United States physicians: a vignette-based study.

Authors:  Katrina F Trivers; Laura-Mae Baldwin; Jacqueline W Miller; Barbara Matthews; C Holly A Andrilla; Denise M Lishner; Barbara A Goff
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Efficient identification and referral of low-income women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer: a practice-based approach.

Authors:  G Joseph; C Kaplan; J Luce; R Lee; S Stewart; C Guerra; R Pasick
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Empowering primary care health professionals in medical genetics: how soon? How fast? How far?

Authors:  K Greendale; R E Pyeritz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2001

7.  Keeping it simple: genetics referrals for all invasive serous ovarian cancers.

Authors:  R Demsky; J McCuaig; M Maganti; K J Murphy; B Rosen; S R Armel
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Does the diagnosis of breast or ovarian cancer trigger referral to genetic counseling?

Authors:  C Bethan Powell; Ramey Littell; Elizabeth Hoodfar; Fiona Sinclair; Alice Pressman
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.437

9.  American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  Estimating the referral rate for cancer genetic assessment from a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  C Featherstone; A Colley; K Tucker; J Kirk; M B Barton
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-01-29       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  11 in total

1.  A universal genetic testing initiative for patients with high-grade, non-mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer and the implications for cancer treatment.

Authors:  Erica M Bednar; Holly D Oakley; Charlotte C Sun; Catherine C Burke; Mark F Munsell; Shannon N Westin; Karen H Lu
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Are Australasian Genetic Counselors Interested in Private Practice at the Primary Care Level of Health Service?

Authors:  Vrunda Sane; Linda Humphreys; Madelyn Peterson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  High-Risk Palliative Care Patients' Knowledge and Attitudes about Hereditary Cancer Testing and DNA Banking.

Authors:  John M Quillin; Oluwabunmi Emidio; Brittany Ma; Lauryn Bailey; Thomas J Smith; In Guk Kang; Brandon J Yu; Oluwafemi Patrick Owodunni; Mohammed Abusamaan; Rab Razzak; Joann N Bodurtha
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Family history risk assessment by a genetic counselor is a critical step in screening all patients in the ART clinic.

Authors:  Amy Vance
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Provider discussion of genetic counseling among high-risk Spanish-preferring Latina breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Claire C Conley; Jessica N Rivera Rivera; Eida M Castro-Figueroa; Laura Moreno; Julie Dutil; Jennifer D García; Charité Ricker; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Hatem Soliman; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 3.626

6.  The effect of referral for genetic counseling on genetic testing and surgical prevention in women at high risk for ovarian cancer: Results from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Charles W Drescher; J David Beatty; Robert Resta; M Robyn Andersen; Kate Watabayashi; Jason Thorpe; Sarah Hawley; Hannah Purkey; Jessica Chubak; Nancy Hanson; Diana S M Buist; Nicole Urban
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Creation and Implementation of an Environmental Scan to Assess Cancer Genetics Services at Three Oncology Care Settings.

Authors:  Erica M Bednar; Michael T Walsh; Ellen Baker; Kimberly I Muse; Holly D Oakley; Rebekah C Krukenberg; Cara S Dresbold; Sandra B Jenkinson; Amanda L Eppolito; Kelly B Teed; Molly H Klein; Nichole A Morman; Elizabeth C Bowdish; Pauline Russ; Emaline E Wise; Julia N Cooper; Michael W Method; John W Henson; Andrew V Grainger; Banu K Arun; Karen H Lu
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 8.  The composition and capacity of the clinical genetics workforce in high-income countries: a scoping review.

Authors:  Nick Dragojlovic; Kennedy Borle; Nicola Kopac; Ursula Ellis; Patricia Birch; Shelin Adam; Jan M Friedman; Amy Nisselle; Alison M Elliott; Larry D Lynd
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  The stepwise process of integrating a genetic counsellor into primary care.

Authors:  Caitlin Slomp; Emily Morris; Morgan Price; Alison M Elliott; Jehannine Austin
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 5.351

Review 10.  Evolution of genetic assessment for BRCA-associated gynaecologic malignancies: a Canadian multisociety roadmap.

Authors:  Jeanna M McCuaig; Tracy L Stockley; Patricia Shaw; Michael Fung-Kee-Fung; Alon D Altman; James Bentley; Marcus Q Bernardini; Beatrice Cormier; Hal Hirte; Katharina Kieser; Andree MacMillan; Wendy S Meschino; Karen Panabaker; Renee Perrier; Diane Provencher; Kasmintan A Schrader; Kimberly Serfas; Eva Tomiak; Nora Wong; Sean S Young; Walter Henri Gotlieb; Paul Hoskins; Raymond H Kim
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 6.318

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.