Literature DB >> 2560004

Opportunistic health promotion: quantity or quality?

R M Pill, G Jones-Elwyn, N C Stott.   

Abstract

A cohort of 130 working class mothers has been studied in depth over five years to quantify the extent of recording and counselling of lifestyle problems by general practitioners and their staff. Clinical records and mothers' personal accounts at two home interviews five years apart provide the data for this work. Fifty-nine per cent of women had one or more aspects of lifestyle recorded in their records, the commonest being smoking habits. Despite this evidence for good coverage of smokers in the population, alcohol and exercise problems were under-recorded. Clinical records only included details of advice given and follow-up plans for lifestyle problems in 40% of patients' records yet the women themselves remembered advice being given in 48% of cases. An analysis of the womens' accounts in conjunction with the clinical records revealed that over three quarters of those receiving advice remembered it several years later. The primary care team was most likely to target advice and plans on women who were heavy smokers and very obese. This study shows that clinical records underestimate the amount of lifestyle counselling which is conducted in general practice and that a surprising number of working class women remember and act on the advice from their doctors. The implications for clinical recording of lifestyle factors are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2560004      PMCID: PMC1712022     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract        ISSN: 0035-8797


  8 in total

1.  Five preventive activities carried out during general practice consultations.

Authors:  C Page
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-06-04

2.  Choice or chance: further evidence on ideas of illness and responsibility for health.

Authors:  R Pill; N C Stott
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Prevention in practice: what Wessex general practitioners are doing.

Authors:  J C Catford; D Nutbeam
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-03-17

4.  Controlled trial of three different antismoking interventions in general practice.

Authors:  K Jamrozik; M Vessey; G Fowler; N Wald; G Parker; H Van Vunakis
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-05-19

5.  Increased absenteeism from work after detection and labeling of hypertensive patients.

Authors:  R B Haynes; D L Sackett; D W Taylor; E S Gibson; A L Johnson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-10-05       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Preventive procedures and practices among working class women: new data and fresh insights.

Authors:  R Pill; N C Stott
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  An evaluation of recorded information about preventive measures in 38 practices.

Authors:  D M Fleming; M S Lawrence
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1981-10

8.  Life events, social network, life-style, and health: an analysis of the 1979 National Survey of Personal Health Practices and Consequences.

Authors:  N H Gottlieb; L W Green
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1984
  8 in total
  12 in total

1.  Family practitioners' intervention against smoking in Germany and the UK: does remuneration affect preventive activity?

Authors:  N Donner-Banzhoff; L Kreienbrock; E Baum
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  1996

2.  Accuracy of parental report and electronic health record documentation as measures of diet and physical activity counseling.

Authors:  Ulfat Shaikh; Jasmine Nettiksimmons; Robert A Bell; Daniel Tancredi; Patrick S Romano
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 3.107

Review 3.  Methods of helping patients with behaviour change.

Authors:  S Rollnick; P Kinnersley; N Stott
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-07-17

Review 4.  Tackling alcohol misuse: opportunities and obstacles in primary care.

Authors:  A Deehan; E J Marshall; J Strang
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Who is targeted for lifestyle advice? A cross-sectional survey in two general practices.

Authors:  P Little; L Slocock; S Griffin; J Pillinger
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Comparison of patient questionnaire, medical record, and audio tape in assessment of health promotion in general practice consultations.

Authors:  A Wilson; P McDonald
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-12-03

7.  Health checks in general practice: another example of inverse care?

Authors:  D Waller; M Agass; D Mant; A Coulter; A Fuller; L Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-04-28

8.  Patient recall of receiving lifestyle advice for overweight and hypertension from their General Practitioner.

Authors:  Alison O Booth; Caryl A Nowson
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Lifestyle advice in general practice: rates recalled by patients.

Authors:  C Silagy; J Muir; A Coulter; M Thorogood; P Yudkin; L Roe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-10-10

10.  The potential and limitations of opportunistic screening: data from a computer simulation of a general practice screening programme.

Authors:  P Norman; M Fitter
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.