OBJECTIVE: To determine whether parental reports and electronic health record documentation of physician counseling on nutrition and physical activity reflect actual counseling provided. METHODS: Participants were parents of 198 children 2 to 12 years of age seen in a primary care pediatric clinic at an academic medical center for well child care and their 38 physicians. Parents completed a post-visit questionnaire to report discussions on weight, nutrition, and physical activity that occurred during the visit. Electronic health records were reviewed to measure documentation of these topics during the visit. Parental reports and records were compared with actual discussions on the basis of coded audiotapes. Counseling was coded as having occurred if specific topics were mentioned during the encounter, however brief this mention was. RESULTS: A total of 48% of the children were female, they were a mean age of 5.4 years, and 28% were overweight or obese. Sensitivity of parental report was high (63%-96%), but specificity was low (43%-77%) because of parents' tendency to overreport counseling. Sensitivity of electronic health record documentation was generally low (40%-53%) except for discussion of screen time (92%) and physical activity (88%); the specificity of these data was also poor (42% and 21%, respectively, for screen time and physical activity). CONCLUSIONS: Electronic health record documentation may not be the most valid method of measuring physician counseling on weight, nutrition, and physical activity in pediatric primary care. Parental report via the use of a questionnaire administered immediately after the visit is a better alternative in quality improvement or research studies when resources do not allow for direct observation, with the caveat that parents may overreport whether counseling was provided. Copyright Â
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether parental reports and electronic health record documentation of physician counseling on nutrition and physical activity reflect actual counseling provided. METHODS:Participants were parents of 198 children 2 to 12 years of age seen in a primary care pediatric clinic at an academic medical center for well child care and their 38 physicians. Parents completed a post-visit questionnaire to report discussions on weight, nutrition, and physical activity that occurred during the visit. Electronic health records were reviewed to measure documentation of these topics during the visit. Parental reports and records were compared with actual discussions on the basis of coded audiotapes. Counseling was coded as having occurred if specific topics were mentioned during the encounter, however brief this mention was. RESULTS: A total of 48% of the children were female, they were a mean age of 5.4 years, and 28% were overweight or obese. Sensitivity of parental report was high (63%-96%), but specificity was low (43%-77%) because of parents' tendency to overreport counseling. Sensitivity of electronic health record documentation was generally low (40%-53%) except for discussion of screen time (92%) and physical activity (88%); the specificity of these data was also poor (42% and 21%, respectively, for screen time and physical activity). CONCLUSIONS: Electronic health record documentation may not be the most valid method of measuring physician counseling on weight, nutrition, and physical activity in pediatric primary care. Parental report via the use of a questionnaire administered immediately after the visit is a better alternative in quality improvement or research studies when resources do not allow for direct observation, with the caveat that parents may overreport whether counseling was provided. Copyright Â
Authors: Christopher N Sciamanna; Michael G Goldstein; Bess H Marcus; Kipp Lawrence; Bernadine M Pinto Journal: Prev Med Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Michael F McDermott; Richard O Lenhardt; Catherine D Catrambone; James Walter; Kevin B Weiss Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2006-02-22 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Douglas Berger; Gwen T Lapham; Susan M Shortreed; Eric J Hawkins; Anna D Rubinsky; Emily C Williams; Carol E Achtmeyer; Daniel R Kivlahan; Katharine A Bradley Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2017-10-18 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Thomas A Arcury; Joseph A Skelton; Edward H Ip; Cynthia K Suerken; Grisel Trejo; Sara A Quandt Journal: J Health Care Poor Underserved Date: 2016
Authors: Aletha Y Akers; Esa M Davis; Lovie J Jackson Foster; Penelope Morrison; Gina Sucato; Elizabeth Miller; Minjae Lee Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2013-10-14
Authors: Stephen G Henry; Bo Feng; Peter Franks; Robert A Bell; Daniel J Tancredi; Dustin Gottfeld; Richard L Kravitz Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2014-05-19 Impact factor: 3.402