Literature DB >> 10885085

Who is targeted for lifestyle advice? A cross-sectional survey in two general practices.

P Little1, L Slocock, S Griffin, J Pillinger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent health promotion guidelines reimbursed primary health care teams for targeting lifestyle advice to patients at risk of cardiovascular disease. However, it is unclear whether primary health care teams do target advice, who is targeted, and whether the advice is acted upon. AIM: To assess which factors predict the targeting and recall of lifestyle advice.
METHOD: A total of 370 patients with, and 192 without, a computer record of risk factors for cardiovascular disease (hypertension, diabetes, ischaemic heart disease/myocardial infarction/angina, a body mass index > or = 30) from two contrasting Wessex practices were sent a postal questionnaire about medical conditions, recall of lifestyle advice, current lifestyle, and their perceptions about the health of their lifestyle.
RESULTS: Seventy-seven per cent of patients responded. There was good agreement between listed risk factors and patients reporting a risk factor (kappa = 0.60), which was similar for both sexes and better in older age groups. Recall of lifestyle advice was not significantly affected by practice, but was more likely in patients with listed risk factors (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 4.62, 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 2.89-7.37) and in men (OR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.07-2.52), and less likely in older age groups (age < or = 64 years = 1.00; 65-74 years = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.27-0.81; 75+ years = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.20-0.60). Of patients with listed risk factors, 27% could not recall having received any advice, and recall varied with medical condition. Only 40% of patients with reported high blood pressure recalled being given advice about salt. Those who recalled advice were more likely to report a healthier current lifestyle. Of those with unhealthy lifestyles, 30-50% were unaware that their lifestyle was unhealthy.
CONCLUSION: Lifestyle advice is not recalled for some important risk factors, and some patients are unaware of their unhealthy lifestyle. Although advice is being preferentially targeted to those with risk factors, women and older patients recall advice less. Research is needed to assess the cost-effectiveness of advice for both sexes and different ages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10885085      PMCID: PMC1313532     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  18 in total

1.  Does potassium supplementation lower blood pressure? A meta-analysis of published trials.

Authors:  F P Cappuccio; G A MacGregor
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.844

2.  By how much does dietary salt reduction lower blood pressure? III--Analysis of data from trials of salt reduction.

Authors:  M R Law; C D Frost; N J Wald
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-04-06

3.  Where are the women in studies of coronary heart disease?

Authors:  K T Khaw
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-05-01

4.  Opportunistic health promotion: quantity or quality?

Authors:  R M Pill; G Jones-Elwyn; N C Stott
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1989-05

5.  Coronary artery surgery: are women discriminated against?

Authors:  M Petticrew; M McKee; J Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-05-01

6.  Management guidelines in essential hypertension: report of the second working party of the British Hypertension Society.

Authors:  P Sever; G Beevers; C Bulpitt; A Lever; L Ramsay; J Reid; J Swales
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-04-10

7.  Lifestyle advice in general practice: rates recalled by patients.

Authors:  C Silagy; J Muir; A Coulter; M Thorogood; P Yudkin; L Roe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-10-10

8.  The exclusion of the elderly and women from clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J H Gurwitz; N F Col; J Avorn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-09-16       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Does supplementation of diet with 'fish oil' reduce blood pressure? A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  L J Appel; E R Miller; A J Seidler; P K Whelton
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1993-06-28

10.  A simultaneous evaluation of 10 commonly used physical activity questionnaires.

Authors:  D R Jacobs; B E Ainsworth; T J Hartman; A S Leon
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.411

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Non-clinical influences on clinical decision-making: a major challenge to evidence-based practice.

Authors:  F M Hajjaj; M S Salek; M K A Basra; A Y Finlay
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  The Validity of a New Structured Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptoms Scale (SAGIS) for Evaluating Symptoms in the Clinical Setting.

Authors:  N A Koloski; M Jones; J Hammer; M von Wulffen; A Shah; H Hoelz; M Kutyla; D Burger; N Martin; S R Gurusamy; N J Talley; G Holtmann
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Psychosocial, lifestyle, and health status variables in predicting high attendance among adults.

Authors:  P Little; J Somerville; I Williamson; G Warner; M Moore; R Wiles; S George; A Smith; R Peveler
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Randomised controlled factorial trial of dietary advice for patients with a single high blood pressure reading in primary care.

Authors:  Paul Little; Jo Kelly; Jane Barnett; Martina Dorward; Barrie Margetts; Daniel Warm
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-04-13

5.  Patient recall of receiving lifestyle advice for overweight and hypertension from their General Practitioner.

Authors:  Alison O Booth; Caryl A Nowson
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  Attitudes of Slovenian family practice patients toward changing unhealthy lifestyle and the role of family physicians: cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Zalika Klemenc-Ketis; Mateja Bulc; Janko Kersnik
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 1.351

7.  Patients' estimations of the importance of preventive health services: a nationwide, population-based cross-sectional study in Portugal.

Authors:  Luísa Sá; Orquídea Ribeiro; Luís Filipe Azevedo; Luciana Couto; Altamiro Costa-Pereira; Alberto Hespanhol; Paulo Santos; Carlos Martins
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Explaining the variation in the management of lifestyle risk factors in primary health care: a multilevel cross sectional study.

Authors:  Rachel A Laws; Upali W Jayasinghe; Mark F Harris; Anna M Williams; Gawaine Powell Davies; Lynn A Kemp
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 3.295

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.