Literature DB >> 7804055

Comparison of patient questionnaire, medical record, and audio tape in assessment of health promotion in general practice consultations.

A Wilson1, P McDonald.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine what proportion of health promotion activities reported by the patient is recorded in the general practice notes and to compare these methods of assessing health promotion with audio tape analysis.
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data obtained in a controlled trial of differing appointment lengths. After each consultation the medical record was examined and the patient invited to completed a questionnaire. A subsample of consultations was audio taped.
SETTING: Nottinghamshire.
SUBJECTS: 16 general practitioners from 10 practices. This report includes 3324 consultations with patients aged > or = 17, with data on measurement of blood pressure and advice about smoking and alcohol.
RESULTS: Data from questionnaire and medical notes were available for 2281 consultations. Advice on smoking was recorded in the notes in 30.9% of cases in which a patient reported it (for alcohol and measurement of blood pressure, 44.4% and 82.7% of cases respectively). In 516 cases analysis of audio tape and review of records was performed. Advice on smoking was recorded in the patient's notes in 28.6% of cases in which it was detected on audio tape (for alcohol, 31.1% of cases). In 335 consultations data from audio tape and questionnaire were available. Advice on smoking was reported by patients in 73.9% of cases in which it was detected on audio tape (for alcohol, 75.0% of cases).
CONCLUSIONS: Review of the medical record is a reasonably accurate method of assessing measurement of blood pressure in the consultation but would lead to significant underestimation of advice about smoking and alcohol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7804055      PMCID: PMC2541640          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.309.6967.1483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  11 in total

1.  Two stage audit of cerebrovascular and coronary heart disease risk factor recording: the effect of case finding and screening programmes.

Authors:  J M Maitland; J Reid; R J Taylor
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Timer: a new objective measure of consultation content and its application to computer assisted consultations.

Authors:  M Pringle; S Robins; G Brown
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-07-05

3.  A method for increasing patients' recall of information presented by doctors.

Authors:  P Ley; P W Bradshaw; D Eaves; C M Walker
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 7.723

4.  To what extent do clinical notes by general practitioners reflect actual medical performance? A study using simulated patients.

Authors:  J J Rethans; E Martin; J Metsemakers
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Three year follow up of patients with raised blood pressure identified at health checks in general practice.

Authors:  D Mant; C McKinlay; A Fuller; T Randall; E M Fullard; J Muir
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-05-20

7.  Opportunistic health promotion: quantity or quality?

Authors:  R M Pill; G Jones-Elwyn; N C Stott
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1989-05

8.  Development of a questionnaire to assess patients' satisfaction with consultations in general practice.

Authors:  R Baker
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Lifestyle advice in general practice: rates recalled by patients.

Authors:  C Silagy; J Muir; A Coulter; M Thorogood; P Yudkin; L Roe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-10-10

10.  Health promotion in the general practice consultation: a minute makes a difference.

Authors:  A Wilson; P McDonald; L Hayes; J Cooney
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-01-25
View more
  41 in total

Review 1.  Anti-smoking advice from general practitioners: is a population-based approach to advice-giving feasible?

Authors:  T Coleman; A Wilson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Factors associated with the provision of anti-smoking advice in general practice consultations.

Authors:  Alison Wynn; Tim Coleman; Stephen Barrett; Andrew Wilson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  A cluster randomised trial to evaluate a nutrition training programme.

Authors:  Helen Moore; Darren Greenwood; Timothy Gill; Colin Waine; Jennifer Soutter; Ashley Adamson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Development and evaluation of a quality assessment instrument for occupational physicians.

Authors:  W E van der Weide; J H Verbeek; F J van Dijk; C T Hulshof
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Anti-smoking advice in general practice consultations: general practitioners' attitudes, reported practice and perceived problems.

Authors:  T Coleman; A Wilson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 6.  Improving measurement of primary care system performance.

Authors:  William Hogg; Elizabeth Dyke
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Assessing quality in primary care. Can we ask the right questions?

Authors:  A Borgiel; J J O'Neil
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Performance assessment. Family physicians in Montreal meet the mark!

Authors:  François Goulet; André Jacques; Robert Gagnon; Denis Bourbeau; Denis Laberge; Jacques Melanson; Claude Ménard; Pierre Racette; Raymond Rivest
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Validation of the "SmoCess-GP" instrument - a short patient questionnaire for assessing the smoking cessation activities of general practitioners: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Julia Jung; Melanie Neumann; Markus Wirtz; Nicole Ernstmann; Andrea Staratschek-Jox; Jürgen Wolf; Holger Pfaff
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  Are there valid proxy measures of clinical behaviour? A systematic review.

Authors:  Susan Hrisos; Martin P Eccles; Jill J Francis; Heather O Dickinson; Eileen F S Kaner; Fiona Beyer; Marie Johnston
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.