Literature DB >> 2344539

Health checks in general practice: another example of inverse care?

D Waller1, M Agass, D Mant, A Coulter, A Fuller, L Jones.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess attendance at and the characteristics of patients attending health checks for cardiovascular disease offered in a general practice over a period of five years (1984-9).
DESIGN: Medical record audit and postal questionnaire survey.
SETTING: One general practice in Oxfordshire with a socially diverse population. PARTICIPANTS: 1101 Men and 1110 women aged 35-64 registered with the practice. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Age, sex, marital state, social class, smoking habits, alcohol consumption, and diet.
RESULTS: Of the 2211 men and women in the target age group (35-64) in 1989, 1458 (65.9%) had been offered screening and 963 (43.6%) had attended for a health check. Attenders were more likely to be women, aged greater than or equal to 45, married, non-smokers, and of higher social class than patients who did not respond to the invitation. The relative likelihood of non-attendance was 1.24 for smokers, 1.20 for the overweight, 1.16 for heavy drinkers, and 1.28 for those with a less healthy diet, even after adjustment for age, sex, marital state, and social class.
CONCLUSIONS: After five years of offering health checks, opportunistically (to men) and in the context of cervical smear tests (to women), less than half of the eligible patients had attended. The likelihood of acceptance of an invitation to attend was inversely related to the patient's cardiovascular risk for all factors measured except age. A coherent strategy to reduce cardiovascular disease depends on more careful targeting of scarce health service resources and more emphasis on public health measures (such as dietary regulation and tobacco taxation). Doctors should be careful not to absolve the government of its public health obligations by substituting unproved preventive interventions aimed at the individual patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2344539      PMCID: PMC1662817          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.300.6732.1115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  12 in total

1.  The inverse care law.

Authors:  J T Hart
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1971-02-27       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Facilitating prevention in primary care.

Authors:  E Fullard; G Fowler; M Gray
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-12-08

3.  Opportunities for prevention: the consultation.

Authors:  S A Smail
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-04-10

4.  Attendance at a breast screening clinic: a problem of administration or attitudes.

Authors:  K French; A M Porter; S E Robinson; F M McCallum; J G Howie; M M Roberts
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982 Aug 28-Sep 4

5.  Opportunistic health promotion: quantity or quality?

Authors:  R M Pill; G Jones-Elwyn; N C Stott
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1989-05

6.  Promoting prevention in primary care: controlled trial of low technology, low cost approach.

Authors:  E Fullard; G Fowler; M Gray
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-04-25

7.  Evaluation of a practice-based programme of health checks: financial cost and success at risk detection.

Authors:  G Sacks; R Marsden
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1989-09

8.  Survey of population coverage in cervical cancer screening in the Oxford region.

Authors:  A Coulter; A Baldwin
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1987-10

9.  Coronary heart disease: account of a preventive clinic in general practice.

Authors:  J G Wrench; R Irvine
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1984-09

10.  Invitation to attend a health check in a general practice setting: the views of a cohort of non-attenders.

Authors:  R Pill; N Stott
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1988-02
View more
  46 in total

1.  Follow up care in general practice of patients with myocardial infarction and angina. Trial was underpowered.

Authors:  J Robson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-08-07

2.  The use of targets to improve the performance of health care providers: a discussion of government policy.

Authors:  R Elkan; J Robinson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Preventing cardiovascular disease in primary care.

Authors:  L Toop; D Richards
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-08-04

Review 4.  Rule of halves: implications of increasing diagnosis and reducing dropout for future workload and prescribing costs in primary care.

Authors:  J T Hart
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Provision of health promotion clinics in relation to population need: another example of the inverse care law?

Authors:  S J Gillam
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Coronary heart disease: preventable but not prevented?

Authors:  J T Hart
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Prevalence of risk factors for heart disease in OXCHECK trial: implications for screening in primary care. Imperial Cancer Research Fund OXCHECK Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-05-04

8.  Facilitating prevention in primary care.

Authors:  D Mant
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-03-14

9.  Prevention in general practice: the views of doctors in the Oxford region.

Authors:  A Coulter; T Schofield
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Cardiovascular risk during early adult life. Risk markers among participants in "Live for Life" health promotion programme in Sweden.

Authors:  L G Persson; K Lindström; H Lingfors; C Bengtsson; L Lissner
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.