Literature DB >> 2560003

Can health screening damage your health?

H G Stoate.   

Abstract

This study set out to determine whether screening can be psychologically harmful to healthy adults. A prospective controlled study was carried out on 215 healthy adults attending a by-invitation coronary heart disease screening clinic in general practice. The general health questionnaire was used as an indicator of recent psychological distress. Patients attending the screening clinic had significantly lower subjective psychological distress than an unscreened group of 225 age-matched controls, indicating that we may well be screening an already psychologically healthy sub-group. The main finding was that patients' own assessment of their psychological distress was significantly increased three months after screening compared with that of controls, who showed a non-significant decrease. It is concluded that there is a real risk of causing distress by screening healthy adults and that this possibility has largely been ignored by previous studies. Possible explanations and implications of these findings are discussed, particularly in the light of increased pressure from many quarters for more screening services to be set up in general practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2560003      PMCID: PMC1712014     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract        ISSN: 0035-8797


  7 in total

1.  Multiphasic checkup evaluation study. 4. Preliminary cost benefit analysis for middle-aged men.

Authors:  M F Collen; L G Dales; G D Friedman; C D Flagle; R Feldman; A B Siegelaub
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 2.  Validation of screening procedures.

Authors:  A L Cochrane; W W Holland
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 4.291

3.  UK heart disease prevention project: incidence and mortality results.

Authors:  G Rose; H D Tunstall-Pedoe; R F Heller
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1983-05-14       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Measuring social inequality: occupational classifications and their alternatives.

Authors:  M Morgan
Journal:  Community Med       Date:  1983-05

5.  Culture, illness, and care: clinical lessons from anthropologic and cross-cultural research.

Authors:  A Kleinman; L Eisenberg; B Good
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Increased absenteeism from work after detection and labeling of hypertensive patients.

Authors:  R B Haynes; D L Sackett; D W Taylor; E S Gibson; A L Johnson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-10-05       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Psychiatric illness in general practice. A detailed study using a new method of case identification.

Authors:  D P Goldberg; B Blackwell
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1970-05-23
  7 in total
  38 in total

1.  The UMDS MSc in general practice: attainment of intended outcomes.

Authors:  G Calvert; N Britten
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  The cholesterol controversy.

Authors:  P Thomas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-04-04

3.  Provision of health promotion clinics in relation to population need: another example of the inverse care law?

Authors:  S J Gillam
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Role of research in development of organisation and structure of general practice.

Authors:  D C Morrell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-06-01

5.  Effects of genetic screening on perceptions of health: a pilot study.

Authors:  T M Marteau; M van Duijn; I Ellis
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 6.318

6.  Psychological factors associated with emotional responses to receiving genetic risk information.

Authors:  Paul Bennett; Clare Wilkinson; Jim Turner; Kate Brain; Rhiannon Tudor Edwards; Gethin Griffith; Barbara France; Jonathon Gray
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Cost effectiveness of incremental programmes for lowering serum cholesterol concentration: is individual intervention worth while?

Authors:  I S Kristiansen; A E Eggen; D S Thelle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-05-11

8.  Screening in practice: Reducing the psychological costs.

Authors:  T M Marteau
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-07-07

9.  Why is preventive medicine exempted from ethical constraints?

Authors:  P Skrabanek
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  Acceptability of opportunistic screening for occult gastrointestinal blood loss.

Authors:  F D Hobbs; R C Cherry; J W Fielding; L Pike; R Holder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-02-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.