Literature DB >> 1552538

Effects of genetic screening on perceptions of health: a pilot study.

T M Marteau1, M van Duijn, I Ellis.   

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to determine how carriers of a recessive gene, which confers no risk to their own health, perceive their health, relative to non-carriers. Perceptions of health in three groups were compared: those screened and found to carry the gene for Tay-Sachs disease, those screened and not found to carry the gene for Tay-Sachs disease, and a community based sample who, it was presumed, had not undergone screening. The groups did not differ in their perceptions of their current health or their past health. Carriers, however, viewed their future health with less optimism than the other two groups. The causes and consequences of this altered perception need to be explored in future studies. With the advent of population based screening for cystic fibrosis carrier status, these results highlight the importance of assessing in detail people's experiences of screening before the introduction of any mass genetic screening programmes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1552538      PMCID: PMC1015816          DOI: 10.1136/jmg.29.1.24

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Genet        ISSN: 0022-2593            Impact factor:   6.318


  14 in total

1.  Social aspects of genetic screening for Tay-Sachs disease: the pilot community screening program in Baltimore and Washington.

Authors:  D V McQueen
Journal:  Soc Biol       Date:  1975

2.  The public understanding of science.

Authors:  J R Durant; G A Evans; G P Thomas
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-07-06       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The Health Orientation Scale: a measure of feelings about sickle cell trait.

Authors:  E Q Wooldridge; R F Murray
Journal:  Soc Biol       Date:  1988 Spring-Summer

4.  Sickle cell "nondisease". A potentially serious public health problem.

Authors:  M L Hampton; J Anderson; B S Lavizzo; A B Bergmen
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1974-07

5.  Why it won't happen to me: perceptions of risk factors and susceptibility.

Authors:  N D Weinstein
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.267

6.  Identification of the cystic fibrosis gene: cloning and characterization of complementary DNA.

Authors:  J R Riordan; J M Rommens; B Kerem; N Alon; R Rozmahel; Z Grzelczak; J Zielenski; S Lok; N Plavsic; J L Chou
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-09-08       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Can health screening damage your health?

Authors:  H G Stoate
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1989-05

8.  Attitudes of at-risk and affected individuals regarding presymptomatic testing for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

Authors:  E Sujansky; S B Kreutzer; A M Johnson; D C Lezotte; R W Schrier; P A Gabow
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1990-04

9.  Uptake of amniocentesis in women aged 38 years or more by the time of the expected date of delivery: a two-year retrospective study.

Authors:  P D Knott; R J Penketh; M K Lucas
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1986-12

10.  A child with cystic fibrosis: II. Subsequent family planning decisions, reproduction and use of prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  G Evers-Kiebooms; L Denayer; H Van den Berghe
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.438

View more
  25 in total

1.  Carrier testing of children for two X linked diseases in a family based setting: a retrospective long term psychosocial evaluation.

Authors:  O Järvinen; A M Aalto; A E Lehesjoki; M Lindlöf; I Söderling; A Uutela; H Kääriäinen
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Cystic fibrosis genotypes and views on screening are both heterogeneous and population related.

Authors:  C R Scriver; T M Fujiwara
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 3.  Newborn screening: new developments, new dilemmas.

Authors:  N J Kerruish; S P Robertson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 4.  Illness representations, self-regulation, and genetic counseling: a theoretical review.

Authors:  Shoshana Shiloh
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Can we make assumptions about the psychosocial impact of living as a carrier, based on studies assessing the effects of carrier testing?

Authors:  Celine Lewis; Heather Skirton; Ray Jones
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Living with genetic risk: effect on adolescent self-concept.

Authors:  Allyn McConkie-Rosell; Gail A Spiridigliozzi; Elizabeth Melvin; Deborah V Dawson; Ave M Lachiewicz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.908

7.  Questioning the consensus: managing carrier status results generated by newborn screening.

Authors:  Fiona Alice Miller; Jason Scott Robert; Robin Z Hayeems
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 8.  Reconsidering reproductive benefit through newborn screening: a systematic review of guidelines on preconception, prenatal and newborn screening.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; Fiona A Miller; Robin Z Hayeems; Denise Avard; Bartha M Knoppers
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 9.  Genetic testing and common disorders in a public health framework: how to assess relevance and possibilities. Background Document to the ESHG recommendations on genetic testing and common disorders.

Authors:  Frauke Becker; Carla G van El; Dolores Ibarreta; Eleni Zika; Stuart Hogarth; Pascal Borry; Anne Cambon-Thomsen; Jean Jacques Cassiman; Gerry Evers-Kiebooms; Shirley Hodgson; A Cécile J W Janssens; Helena Kaariainen; Michael Krawczak; Ulf Kristoffersson; Jan Lubinski; Christine Patch; Victor B Penchaszadeh; Andrew Read; Wolf Rogowski; Jorge Sequeiros; Lisbeth Tranebjaerg; Irene M van Langen; Helen Wallace; Ron Zimmern; Jörg Schmidtke; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.246

10.  The genetic testing of children.

Authors:  A Fryer
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.