Literature DB >> 1493005

Provision of health promotion clinics in relation to population need: another example of the inverse care law?

S J Gillam1.   

Abstract

The new contract encourages health promotion in general practice. The aim of this study was to explore the pattern of provision of health promotion clinics across one family health services authority and to relate this to possible indicators of health need in the practice population. Single-handed practices were less likely to be running health promotion clinics. The proportion of practices running clinics increased with increasing numbers of partners. Practices located in wards where the standardized mortality ratio was greater than 100, and practices receiving deprivation payments were less likely to be offering health promotion clinics. This was explained by the presence of most single-handed practitioners in deprived, historically unhealthy wards. If effective, health promotion clinics will have tended to benefit populations in Bedfordshire at lower risk of ill-health. Other shortcomings of the clinic-based health promotion model are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1493005      PMCID: PMC1371923     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  18 in total

1.  The population mean predicts the number of deviant individuals.

Authors:  G Rose; S Day
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-11-03

2.  If preventable, why not...?

Authors:  S Lock
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990 Dec 22-29

3.  General practices and the new contract. I--Reactions and impact.

Authors:  J Bain
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-05-18

4.  Health promotion in general practice.

Authors:  S Amiel; I Health; J Bennett; D Kelley; C Dickinson; R Miller
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-03-02

5.  Second thoughts on the Jarman index.

Authors:  G D Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-02-16

6.  Calculation of the underprivileged area score for a practice in inner London.

Authors:  H D Chase; P R Davies
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Alcohol abuse.

Authors:  L Dillner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-04-13

8.  Health promotion under the new contract.

Authors:  P Hanlon; F Toal; D Black
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Facilitating prevention in primary care.

Authors:  E Fullard; G Fowler; M Gray
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-12-08

10.  Health checks in general practice: another example of inverse care?

Authors:  D Waller; M Agass; D Mant; A Coulter; A Fuller; L Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-04-28
View more
  14 in total

1.  The use of targets to improve the performance of health care providers: a discussion of government policy.

Authors:  R Elkan; J Robinson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Who cares in England and Wales? The Positive Care Law: cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Mary Shaw; Danny Dorling
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  A few lessons in screening for Gordon Brown.

Authors:  Julian Tudor Hart
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-01-19

4.  Who should give lifestyle advice in general practice and what factors influence attendance at health promotion clinics? Survey of patients' views.

Authors:  J Eggleston; J Gallagher; M Gallagher; T Hares; E Murray; N Naroz; T Owen; P Price; L Pym; L Reed
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  The carrot, the stick and the general practitioner: how have changes in financial incentives affected health promotion activity in general practice?

Authors:  S Langham; S Gillam; M Thorogood
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 6.  The modernisation of general practice in the UK: 1980 to 1995 and beyond. Part II.

Authors:  S Iliffe
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.401

7.  Who cares about equity in the NHS?

Authors:  M Whitehead
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-05-14

8.  Effect of practice and patient population characteristics on the uptake of childhood immunizations.

Authors:  M Lynch
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Using patient and general practice characteristics to explain variations in cervical smear uptake rates.

Authors:  F A Majeed; D G Cook; H R Anderson; S Hilton; S Bunn; C Stones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-05-14

10.  Practice characteristics and prescribing of cardiovascular drugs in areas with higher risk of CHD in Scotland: cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Gary McLean
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2008-07-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.