Literature DB >> 25598937

Can stone density on plain radiography predict the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones?

Ki Hong Lim1, Jin-Hee Jung2, Jae Hyun Kwon2, Yong Seok Lee2, Jungbum Bae1, Min Chul Cho1, Kwang Soo Lee1, Hae Won Lee1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective was to determine whether stone density on plain radiography (kidney-ureter-bladder, KUB) could predict the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) for ureteral stones.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 223 patients treated by ESWL for radio-opaque ureteral stones of 5 to 20 mm were included in this retrospective study. All patients underwent routine blood and urine analyses, plain radiography (KUB), and noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT) before ESWL. Demographic, stone, and radiological characteristics on KUB and NCCT were analyzed. The patients were categorized into two groups: lower-density (LD) group (radiodensity less than or equal to that of the 12th rib, n=163) and higher-density (HD) group (radiodensity greater than that of the 12th rib, n=60). Stone-free status was assessed by KUB every week after ESWL. A successful outcome was defined as stone free within 1 month after ESWL.
RESULTS: Mean stone size in the LD group was significantly smaller than that in the HD group (7.5±1.4 mm compared with 9.9±2.9 mm, p=0.002). The overall success rates in the LD and HD groups were 82.1% and 60.0%, respectively (p=0.007). The mean duration of stone-free status and average number of SWL sessions required for success in the two groups were 21.7 compared with 39.2 days and 1.8 compared with 2.3, respectively (p<0.05). On multivariate logistic analysis, stone size and time to ESWL since colic and radiodensity of the stone on KUB were independent predictors of successful ESWL.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that larger stone size, longer time to ESWL, and ureteral stones with a radiodensity greater than that of the 12th rib may be at a relatively higher risk of ESWL failure 1 month after the procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone density; Lithotripsy; Ureteral calculi

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25598937      PMCID: PMC4294856          DOI: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.1.56

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Urol        ISSN: 2005-6737


  21 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines on urolithiasis.

Authors:  H G Tiselius; D Ackermann; P Alken; C Buck; P Conort; M Gallucci
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Prediction of outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the management of ureteric calculi.

Authors:  Mingqing Wang; Qiduo Shi; Xuguang Wang; Kun Yang; Rui Yang
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-04-18

3.  Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976-1994.

Authors:  Kiriaki K Stamatelou; Mildred E Francis; Camille A Jones; Leroy M Nyberg; Gary C Curhan
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 10.612

4.  Radiographic prognostic criteria for extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy: a study of 485 patients.

Authors:  D Bon; B Dore; J Irani; M Marroncle; J Aubert
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Determination of renal stone composition with dual-energy CT: in vivo analysis and comparison with x-ray diffraction.

Authors:  Guy Hidas; Ruth Eliahou; Mordechai Duvdevani; Phillipe Coulon; Laurent Lemaitre; Ofer N Gofrit; Dov Pode; Jacob Sosna
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Calcium oxalate stone morphology: fine tuning our therapeutic distinctions.

Authors:  S P Dretler; G Polykoff
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Variability of renal stone fragility in shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  James C Williams; K Chee Saw; Ryan F Paterson; Erin K Hatt; James A McAteer; James E Lingeman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Useful prediction of ureteral calculi visibility on abdominal radiographs based on calculi characteristics on unenhanced helical CT and CT scout radiographs.

Authors:  C C Huang; C K Chuang; Y C Wong; L J Wang; C H Wu
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Usefulness of early extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in colic patients with ureteral stones.

Authors:  Hyeung Joon Choi; Jin-Hee Jung; Jungbum Bae; Min Chul Cho; Hae Won Lee; Kwang Soo Lee
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2012-12-20

10.  Stone attenuation value and cross-sectional area on computed tomography predict the success of shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Michio Tanaka; Eisuke Yokota; Yoichiro Toyonaga; Fumitaka Shimizu; Yoshiyuki Ishii; Makoto Fujime; Shigeo Horie
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-07-15
View more
  8 in total

1.  Histogram of kidney stones on non-contrast computed tomography to predict successful stone dusting during retrograde intrarenal surgery.

Authors:  Dong Soo Kim; Sung Kyoung Moon; Sang Hyub Lee
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Role of Stone Heterogeneity Index in Determining Success of Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Urinary Calculi.

Authors:  Nadeem Iqbal; Aisha Hasan; Ahsan Nazar; Sajid Iqbal; Mohammad Haroon Hassan; Behzad Saeed Gill; Rabiyya Khan; Saeed Akhter; Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola
Journal:  J Clin Transl Res       Date:  2021-03-24

3.  Impact of Pretreatment Hydronephrosis on the Success Rate of Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Patients with Ureteral Stone.

Authors:  Ki Don Chang; Joo Yong Lee; Sung Yoon Park; Dong Hyuk Kang; Hyung Ho Lee; Kang Su Cho
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.759

4.  The effect of stone and patient characteristics in predicting extra-corporal shock wave lithotripsy success rate: A cross sectional study.

Authors:  Mohammad Al-Zubi; Ammar Al Sleibi; Basel Mazen Elayan; Subhi Zahi Al-Issawi; Morad Bani-Hani; Adel Alsharei; Jad AlSmadi; Saleh Abualhaj; Ala' Y Ibrahim
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-09-10

5.  Comparison of the outcomes of complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with radiopaque and radiolucent kidney stones.

Authors:  Siavash Falahatkar; Gholamreza Mokhtari; Atiyeh Amin; Ehsan Kazemnezhad; Samaneh Esmaeili; Nadia Rastjou Herfeh; Reza Falahatkar
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-12-01

6.  Effect of urine pH on the effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy: A pilot study.

Authors:  Ahmad Majzoub; Ammar Al-Ani; Tawiz Gul; Hatem Kamkoum; Khalid Al-Jalham
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

7.  Stone heterogeneity index as the standard deviation of Hounsfield units: A novel predictor for shock-wave lithotripsy outcomes in ureter calculi.

Authors:  Joo Yong Lee; Jae Heon Kim; Dong Hyuk Kang; Doo Yong Chung; Dae Hun Lee; Hae Do Jung; Jong Kyou Kwon; Kang Su Cho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Has the pelvic renal stone position inside the upper loop of JJ stent any influence on the extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy results?

Authors:  Catalin Pricop; Dragomir N Serban; Ionela Lacramioara Serban; Alin-Adrian Cumpanas; Constantin-Virgil Gingu
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-08-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.