Literature DB >> 29201513

Comparison of the outcomes of complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with radiopaque and radiolucent kidney stones.

Siavash Falahatkar1, Gholamreza Mokhtari1, Atiyeh Amin1, Ehsan Kazemnezhad1, Samaneh Esmaeili1, Nadia Rastjou Herfeh1, Reza Falahatkar1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the stone opacity effect in patients who had radiopaque and radiolucent stones in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) results.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The medical records of 171 complete supine PCNL procedures were gathered. Patients were categorized into two groups: those with radiopaque (n=141) and those with radiolucent (n=30) stones. Kidney, ureter and bladder x-ray was done a day after PCNL and Ultrasound imaging was done two weeks later to evaluate the stone free rate. A stone free result was defined as having less than 4 mm residual stone size. Outcome parameters were compared by univariate analysis and those which were significantly different between the two groups were assessed by multivariate binary logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, sex, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, pre-surgery hemoglobin, pre-surgery serum creatinine, stone and also surgery-related parameters between the two groups. Stone free rate, surgery time, complication-related parameters, hemoglobin drop, serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) changes were similar in both groups based on univariate analysis. The radiopaque group had higher post-surgery GFR (p=0.04) and longer hospital stay (p=0.009). However, opacity had no effect on these outcomes after multivariate analysis. Higher post-surgery GFR was seen in patient with higher GFR before surgery (p<0.0001). Also, higher hemoglobin before surgery was correlated with less hospital stay (p=0.001).
CONCLUSION: The complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes are similar in patients with radiopaque and radiolucent stones.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Kidney stone; percutaneous nephrolithotomy; stone opacity; supine position

Year:  2017        PMID: 29201513      PMCID: PMC5687213          DOI: 10.5152/tud.2017.14477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Urol        ISSN: 2149-3235


  26 in total

1.  Does the Hounsfield unit value determined by computed tomography predict the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy?

Authors:  Adnan Gücük; Uğur Uyetürk; Ufuk Oztürk; Eray Kemahli; Mevlüt Yildiz; Ahmet Metin
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 2.942

2.  Factors affecting operative time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: our experience with the complete supine position.

Authors:  Siavash Falahatkar; Keivan Gholamjani Moghaddam; Ehsan Kazemnezhad; Ahmad Enshaei; Ahmad Asadollahzade; Alireza Farzan; Reza Shahrokhi Damavand; Hamidreza Baghani Aval; Somayeh Khodabakhsh; Samaneh Esmaeili
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Factors affecting bleeding during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: single surgeon experience.

Authors:  Tolga Akman; Murat Binbay; Erhan Sari; Emrah Yuruk; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Muzaffer Akcay; Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu; Ahmet Tefekli
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Can stone density on plain radiography predict the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones?

Authors:  Ki Hong Lim; Jin-Hee Jung; Jae Hyun Kwon; Yong Seok Lee; Jungbum Bae; Min Chul Cho; Kwang Soo Lee; Hae Won Lee
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-01-06

5.  Comparison of results and morbidity of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  J E Lingeman; T A Coury; D M Newman; R J Kahnoski; J H Mertz; P G Mosbaugh; R E Steele; J R Woods
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Role of radioisotope renal scans in the choice of nephrectomy side in live kidney donors.

Authors:  Ahmed A Shokeir; Hosam M Gad; Tarek el-Diasty
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Using Hounsfield unit measurement and urine parameters to predict uric acid stones.

Authors:  Sara Spettel; Paras Shah; Kiran Sekhar; Allen Herr; Mark D White
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Pre- and perioperative predictors of short-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy.

Authors:  Peter J Olbert; Axel Hegele; Andres J Schrader; André Scherag; Rainer Hofmann
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2007-09-05

9.  Comparison of clinical outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in patients with radiopaque v radiolucent ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Ersin Cimentepe; Ali Unsal; Remzi Saglam; M Derya Balbay
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 10.  Positions for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Thirty-five years of evolution.

Authors:  Theocharis Karaolides; Konstantinos Moraitis; Christian Bach; Junaid Masood; Noor Buchholz
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2012-08-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.