Literature DB >> 25589746

Hemisphere-dependent attentional modulation of human parietal visual field representations.

Summer L Sheremata1, Michael A Silver2.   

Abstract

Posterior parietal cortex contains several areas defined by topographically organized maps of the contralateral visual field. However, recent studies suggest that ipsilateral stimuli can elicit larger responses in the right than left hemisphere within these areas, depending on task demands. Here we determined the effects of spatial attention on the set of visual field locations (the population receptive field [pRF]) that evoked a response for each voxel in human topographic parietal cortex. A two-dimensional Gaussian was used to model the pRF in each voxel, and we measured the effects of attention on not only the center (preferred visual field location) but also the size (visual field extent) of the pRF. In both hemispheres, larger pRFs were associated with attending to the mapping stimulus compared with attending to a central fixation point. In the left hemisphere, attending to the stimulus also resulted in more peripheral preferred locations of contralateral representations, compared with attending fixation. These effects of attention on both pRF size and preferred location preserved contralateral representations in the left hemisphere. In contrast, attentional modulation of pRF size but not preferred location significantly increased representation of the ipsilateral (right) visual hemifield in right parietal cortex. Thus, attention effects in topographic parietal cortex exhibit hemispheric asymmetries similar to those seen in hemispatial neglect. Our findings suggest potential mechanisms underlying the behavioral deficits associated with this disorder.
Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/350508-10$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hemispheric asymmetries; retinotopy; visual attention

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25589746      PMCID: PMC4293407          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2378-14.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  42 in total

1.  Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Peter Bannister; Michael Brady; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Dynamic shifts of visual receptive fields in cortical area MT by spatial attention.

Authors:  Thilo Womelsdorf; Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Florian Pieper; Stefan Treue
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-08-13       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Sustained activity in topographic areas of human posterior parietal cortex during memory-guided saccades.

Authors:  Denis Schluppeck; Clayton E Curtis; Paul W Glimcher; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-05-10       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Relating retinotopic and object-selective responses in human lateral occipital cortex.

Authors:  Rory Sayres; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The retinotopy of visual spatial attention.

Authors:  R B Tootell; N Hadjikhani; E K Hall; S Marrett; W Vanduffel; J T Vaughan; A M Dale
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  A new method for estimating population receptive field topography in visual cortex.

Authors:  Sangkyun Lee; Amalia Papanikolaou; Nikos K Logothetis; Stelios M Smirnakis; Georgios A Keliris
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06

8.  Hemispheric asymmetry in visuotopic posterior parietal cortex emerges with visual short-term memory load.

Authors:  Summer L Sheremata; Katherine C Bettencourt; David C Somers
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Functional heterogeneity in posterior parietal cortex across attention and episodic memory retrieval.

Authors:  J Benjamin Hutchinson; Melina R Uncapher; Kevin S Weiner; David W Bressler; Michael A Silver; Alison R Preston; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 10.  Relating unilateral neglect to the neural coding of space.

Authors:  A Pouget; J Driver
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.627

View more
  31 in total

1.  Functional MRI and EEG Index Complementary Attentional Modulations.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Thomas C Sprague; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Spatial Tuning Shifts Increase the Discriminability and Fidelity of Population Codes in Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Vy A Vo; Thomas C Sprague; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Task set induces dynamic reallocation of resources in visual short-term memory.

Authors:  Summer L Sheremata; Sarah Shomstein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

Review 4.  Computational neuroimaging and population receptive fields.

Authors:  Brian A Wandell; Jonathan Winawer
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Visual Short-Term Memory Activity in Parietal Lobe Reflects Cognitive Processes beyond Attentional Selection.

Authors:  Summer L Sheremata; David C Somers; Sarah Shomstein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Intraparietal regions play a material general role in working memory: Evidence supporting an internal attentional role.

Authors:  Kyle Killebrew; Ryan Mruczek; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Spatial sampling in human visual cortex is modulated by both spatial and feature-based attention.

Authors:  Daniel Marten van Es; Jan Theeuwes; Tomas Knapen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Top-down cortical interactions in visuospatial attention.

Authors:  Timothy P Meehan; Steven L Bressler; Wei Tang; Serguei V Astafiev; Chad M Sylvester; Gordon L Shulman; Maurizio Corbetta
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.270

Review 9.  Visual attention mitigates information loss in small- and large-scale neural codes.

Authors:  Thomas C Sprague; Sameer Saproo; John T Serences
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Structural Variability within Frontoparietal Networks and Individual Differences in Attentional Functions: An Approach Using the Theory of Visual Attention.

Authors:  Magdalena Chechlacz; Celine R Gillebert; Signe A Vangkilde; Anders Petersen; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.