Literature DB >> 25940098

Intraparietal regions play a material general role in working memory: Evidence supporting an internal attentional role.

Kyle Killebrew1, Ryan Mruczek2, Marian E Berryhill3.   

Abstract

Determining the role of intraparietal sulcus (IPS) regions in working memory (WM) remains a topic of considerable interest and lack of clarity. One group of hypotheses, the internal attention view, proposes that the IPS plays a material general role in maintaining information in WM. An alternative viewpoint, the pure storage account, proposes that the IPS in each hemisphere maintains material specific (e.g., left--phonological; right--visuospatial) information. Yet, adjudication between competing theoretical perspectives is complicated by divergent findings from different methodologies and their use of different paradigms, perhaps most notably between functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG). For example, fMRI studies typically use full field stimulus presentations and report bilateral IPS activation, whereas EEG studies direct attention to a single hemifield and report a contralateral bias in both hemispheres. Here, we addressed this question by applying a regions-of-interest fMRI approach to elucidate IPS contributions to WM. Importantly, we manipulated stimulus type (verbal, visuospatial) and the cued hemifield to assess the degree to which IPS activations reflect stimulus specific or stimulus general processing consistent with the pure storage or internal attention hypotheses. These data revealed significant contralateral bias along regions IPS0-5 regardless of stimulus type. Also present was a weaker stimulus-based bias apparent in stronger left lateralized activations for verbal stimuli and stronger right lateralized activations for visuospatial stimuli. However, there was no consistent stimulus-based lateralization of activity. Thus, despite the observation of stimulus-based modulation of spatial lateralization this pattern was bilateral. As such, although it is quantitatively underspecified, our results are overall more consistent with an internal attention view that the IPS plays a material general role in refreshing the contents of WM.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25940098      PMCID: PMC4468015          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.04.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  89 in total

1.  Contralateral neglect induced by right posterior parietal rTMS in healthy subjects.

Authors:  B Fierro; F Brighina; M Oliveri; A Piazza; V La Bua; D Buffa; E Bisiach
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2000-05-15       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Perceptual and response bias in visuospatial neglect due to frontal and parietal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in normal subjects.

Authors:  Filippo Brighina; Edoardo Bisiach; Aurelio Piazza; Massimiliano Oliveri; Vincenzo La Bua; Ornella Daniele; Brigida Fierro
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Flexible, capacity-limited activity of posterior parietal cortex in perceptual as well as visual short-term memory tasks.

Authors:  Daniel J Mitchell; Rhodri Cusack
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Interference: unique source of forgetting in working memory?

Authors:  Pierre Barrouillet; Valérie Camos
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Characterizing evoked hemodynamics with fMRI.

Authors:  K J Friston; C D Frith; R Turner; R S Frackowiak
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Attentional orienting to mnemonic representations: reduction of load-sensitive maintenance-related activity in the intraparietal sulcus.

Authors:  Sabrina Trapp; Jöran Lepsien
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Contralateral delay activity provides a neural measure of the number of representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Akiko Ikkai; Andrew W McCollough; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Hemispheric asymmetry in visuotopic posterior parietal cortex emerges with visual short-term memory load.

Authors:  Summer L Sheremata; Katherine C Bettencourt; David C Somers
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Representation of eye movements and stimulus motion in topographically organized areas of human posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Christina S Konen; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The compensatory dynamic of inter-hemispheric interactions in visuospatial attention revealed using rTMS and fMRI.

Authors:  Ela B Plow; Zaira Cattaneo; Thomas A Carlson; George A Alvarez; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Lorella Battelli
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  A brief comparative review of primate posterior parietal cortex: A novel hypothesis on the human toolmaker.

Authors:  S Kastner; Q Chen; S K Jeong; R E B Mruczek
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Causal Evidence for a Role of Theta and Alpha Oscillations in the Control of Working Memory.

Authors:  Justin Riddle; Jason M Scimeca; Dillan Cellier; Sofia Dhanani; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Decoding information about dynamically occluded objects in visual cortex.

Authors:  Gennady Erlikhman; Gideon P Caplovitz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  The neural representation of objects formed through the spatiotemporal integration of visual transients.

Authors:  Gennady Erlikhman; Gennadiy Gurariy; Ryan E B Mruczek; Gideon P Caplovitz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Induced and Evoked Human Electrophysiological Correlates of Visual Working Memory Set-Size Effects at Encoding.

Authors:  Gennadiy Gurariy; Kyle W Killebrew; Marian E Berryhill; Gideon P Caplovitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.