Literature DB >> 25578596

Isotropic three-dimensional fast spin-echo Cube magnetic resonance dacryocystography: comparison with the three-dimensional fast-recovery fast spin-echo technique.

Jing Zhang1, Lang Chen, Qiu-Xia Wang, Rong Liu, Wen-Zhen Zhu, Xin Luo, Li Peng, Wei Xiong.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Three-dimensional fast spin-echo Cube (3D-FSE-Cube) uses modulated refocusing flip angles and autocalibrates two dimensional (2D)-accelerated parallel and nonlinear view ordering to produce high-quality volumetric image sets with high-spatial resolution. Furthermore, 3D-FSE-Cube with topical instillation of fluid can also be used for magnetic resonance dacryocystography (MRD) with good soft tissue contrast. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the technical quality and visualization of the lacrimal drainage system (LDS) when using the 3D-FSE-Cube sequence and the 3D fast-recovery fast spin-echo (FRFSE) sequence.
METHODS: In total, 75 patients with primary LDS outflow impairment or postsurgical recurrent epiphora underwent 3D-FSE-Cube MRD and 3D-FRFSE MRD at 3.0 T after topical administration of compound sodium chloride eye drops. Two radiologists graded the images from either of the two sequences in a blinded fashion, and appropriate statistical tests were used to assess differences in technical quality, visibility of ductal segments, and number of segments visualized per LDS.
RESULTS: Obstructions were confirmed in 90 of the 150 LDSs assessed. The technical quality of 3D-FSE-Cube MRD and 3D-FRFSE MRD was statistically equivalent (P = 0.871). However, compared with 3D-FRFSE MRD, 3D-FSE-Cube MRD improved the overall visibility and the visibility of the upper drainage segments in normal and obstructed LDSs (P < 0.001). There was a corresponding increase in the number of segments visualized per LDS in both groups (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Compared with 3D-FRFSE MRD, 3D-FSE-Cube MRD potentially improves the visibility of the LDS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25578596     DOI: 10.1007/s00234-014-1484-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  19 in total

1.  Optimized single-slab three-dimensional spin-echo MR imaging of the brain.

Authors:  J P Mugler; S Bao; R V Mulkern; C R Guttmann; R L Robertson; F A Jolesz; J R Brookeman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Interactive fast spin-echo imaging.

Authors:  R F Busse; S J Riederer; J G Fletcher; A E Bharucha; K R Brandt
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Multiecho sequences with variable refocusing flip angles: optimization of signal behavior using smooth transitions between pseudo steady states (TRAPS).

Authors:  Juergen Hennig; Matthias Weigel; Klaus Scheffler
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Fast spin echo sequences with very long echo trains: design of variable refocusing flip angle schedules and generation of clinical T2 contrast.

Authors:  Reed F Busse; Hari Hariharan; Anthony Vu; Jean H Brittain
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  High-spatial-resolution isotropic three-dimensional fast-recovery fast spin-echo magnetic resonance dacryocystography combined with topical administration of sterile saline solution.

Authors:  Zhang Jing; Chen Lang; Wang Qiu-Xia; Liu Rong; Luo Xin; Zhu Wen-Zhen; Xia Li-Ming; Qi Jian-Pin; Wang He
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Evaluation of uterine anomalies: 3D FRFSE cube versus standard 2D FRFSE.

Authors:  Garima Agrawal; Jody M Riherd; Reed F Busse; J Louis Hinshaw; Elizabeth A Sadowski
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Evaluation of intraneural ganglion cysts using three-dimensional fast spin echo-cube.

Authors:  Kameron R Shahid; Robert J Spinner; John A Skinner; Joel P Felmlee; Jeffrey R Bond; David W Stanley; Kimberly K Amrami
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Multi-contrast, isotropic, single-slab 3D MR imaging in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Bastiaan Moraal; Stefan D Roosendaal; Petra J W Pouwels; Hugo Vrenken; Ronald A van Schijndel; Dominik S Meier; Charles R G Guttmann; Jeroen J G Geurts; Frederik Barkhof
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Dynamic MR dacryocystography in patients with epiphora.

Authors:  R Cubuk; N Tasali; S Aydin; B Saydam; T Sengor
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 3.528

10.  Effects of refocusing flip angle modulation and view ordering in 3D fast spin echo.

Authors:  Reed F Busse; Anja C S Brau; Anthony Vu; Charles R Michelich; Ersin Bayram; Richard Kijowski; Scott B Reeder; Howard A Rowley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.