Literature DB >> 19062211

Dynamic MR dacryocystography in patients with epiphora.

R Cubuk1, N Tasali, S Aydin, B Saydam, T Sengor.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of dynamic MRI dacryocystography (dMR-DCG) for the assessment of nasolacrimal drainage system (NLDS).
METHODS: The study population consisted of 35 patients with a history of epiphora. Each patient underwent bilateral dMR-DCG and conventional dacryocystography (DCG) to assess the NLDS. Two radiologists, who were unaware of the clinical data, evaluated the images separately for the level of obstruction at the nasolacrimal passage and the presence or absence of lacrimal sac dilatation. The findings from the dMRI-DCG and DCG images were compared. DCG was considered to be the gold standard imaging technique.
RESULTS: dMRI-DCG had a sensitivity of 90.5% and a specificity of 89.3% to detect nasolacrimal passage. In 24 out of 70 NLDS that were assessed, there was 100% agreement between the dMRI-DCG and DCG images in the detection of the obstructed level in the nasolacrimal pathway. The lacrimal sac dilatation finding detected by DCG was not observed by dMRI-DCG in only two patients, in whom there was a prior history of dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) operation. These findings suggest that dMRI-DCG has 94.3% sensitivity and 100% specificity for the diagnosis of lacrimal sac dilatation.
CONCLUSION: dMRI-DCG is an easily performed, minimally invasive imaging technique to identify the presence or absence of obstruction and its level, and lacrimal sac dilatation in the evaluation of NLDS. dMRI-DCG does not require the use of contrast material and ionizing radiation and provides functional information by depicting dynamic behaviour. Thus, dMRI-DCG could be useful as a reliable diagnostic imaging technique in many patients prior to surgery. Copyright (c) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19062211     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.10.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  8 in total

1.  Comment on 'effects of merogel coverage on wound healing and ostial patency in endonasal endoscopic dacryocytorhinostomy for primary chronic dacryocystitis'.

Authors:  S T Mak; A Chak-Ming Wong
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Update on imaging techniques in oculoplastics.

Authors:  Altug Cetinkaya
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-10

3.  Isotropic three-dimensional fast spin-echo Cube magnetic resonance dacryocystography: comparison with the three-dimensional fast-recovery fast spin-echo technique.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Lang Chen; Qiu-Xia Wang; Rong Liu; Wen-Zhen Zhu; Xin Luo; Li Peng; Wei Xiong
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the pre-operative evaluation of obstructive epiphora: true-FISP and VIBE vs gadolinium.

Authors:  Francesco Somma; Vincenzo d'Agostino; Fabio Tortora; Nicola Serra; Gerardo Sorrentino; Valeria Piscitelli; Andrea Somma; Mario Gamerra
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 3.469

5.  MR dacryocystography in the evaluation of patients with obstructive epiphora treated by means of interventional radiologic procedures.

Authors:  B Coskun; E Ilgit; B Onal; O Konuk; G Erbas
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  MR dacryocystography: comparison with dacryoendoscopy in positional diagnosis of nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Hiroki Higashi; Tsutomu Tamada; Kenichi Mizukawa; Katsuyoshi Ito
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy as treatment for lower lacrimal pathway obstructions in adults: Review article.

Authors:  Elina Penttilä; Grigori Smirnov; Henri Tuomilehto; Kai Kaarniranta; Juha Seppä
Journal:  Allergy Rhinol (Providence)       Date:  2015-01

8.  Computed Tomography Versus Dacryocystography for the Evaluation of the Nasolacrimal Duct-A Study With 72 Patients.

Authors:  Serafim Papathanassiou; Thomas Koch; Marie Charlot Suhling; Thomas Lenarz; Martin Durisin; Stefan R O Stolle; Peter Raab
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-07-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.