Literature DB >> 18509658

Multi-contrast, isotropic, single-slab 3D MR imaging in multiple sclerosis.

Bastiaan Moraal1, Stefan D Roosendaal, Petra J W Pouwels, Hugo Vrenken, Ronald A van Schijndel, Dominik S Meier, Charles R G Guttmann, Jeroen J G Geurts, Frederik Barkhof.   

Abstract

To describe signal and contrast properties of an isotropic, single-slab 3D dataset [double inversion-recovery (DIR), fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), T2, and T1-weighted magnetization prepared rapid acquisition gradient-echo (MPRAGE)] and to evaluate its performance in detecting multiple sclerosis (MS) brain lesions compared to 2D T2-weighted spin-echo (T2SE). All single-slab 3D sequences and 2D-T2SE were acquired in 16 MS patients and 9 age-matched healthy controls. Lesions were scored independently by two raters and characterized anatomically. Two-tailed Bonferroni-corrected Student's t-tests were used to detect differences in lesion detection between the various sequences per anatomical area after log-transformation. In general, signal and contrast properties of the 3D sequences enabled improved detection of MS brain lesions compared to 2D-T2SE. Specifically, 3D-DIR showed the highest detection of intracortical and mixed WM-GM lesions, whereas 3D-FLAIR showed the highest total number of WM lesions. Both 3D-DIR and 3D-FLAIR showed the highest number of infratentorial lesions. 3D-T2 and 3D-MPRAGE did not improve lesion detection compared to 2D-T2SE. Multi-contrast, isotropic, single-slab 3D MRI allowed an improved detection of both GM and WM lesions compared to 2D-T2SE. A selection of single-slab 3D contrasts, for example, 3D-FLAIR and 3D-DIR, could replace 2D sequences in the radiological practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18509658     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1009-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  34 in total

1.  Optimized single-slab three-dimensional spin-echo MR imaging of the brain.

Authors:  J P Mugler; S Bao; R V Mulkern; C R Guttmann; R L Robertson; F A Jolesz; J R Brookeman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Estimating the generalized concordance correlation coefficient through variance components.

Authors:  Josep L Carrasco; Lluís Jover
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Does high-field MR imaging have an influence on the classification of patients with clinically isolated syndromes according to current diagnostic mr imaging criteria for multiple sclerosis?

Authors:  M P Wattjes; M Harzheim; C K Kuhl; J Gieseke; S Schmidt; L Klotz; T Klockgether; H H Schild; G G Lutterbey
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance imaging as a surrogate outcome measure of disability in multiple sclerosis: have we been overly harsh in our assessment?

Authors:  Douglas S Goodin
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 10.422

5.  Standardized MR imaging protocol for multiple sclerosis: Consortium of MS Centers consensus guidelines.

Authors:  J H Simon; D Li; A Traboulsee; P K Coyle; D L Arnold; F Barkhof; J A Frank; R Grossman; D W Paty; E W Radue; J S Wolinsky
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Human gray matter: feasibility of single-slab 3D double inversion-recovery high-spatial-resolution MR imaging.

Authors:  Petra J W Pouwels; Joost P A Kuijer; John P Mugler; Charles R G Guttmann; Frederik Barkhof
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Hypothalamic lesions in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  I Huitinga; C J De Groot; P Van der Valk; W Kamphorst; F J Tilders; D F Swaab
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.685

8.  Isotropic 3D fast FLAIR imaging of the brain in multiple sclerosis patients: initial experience.

Authors:  I L Tan; P J W Pouwels; R A van Schijndel; H J Adèr; R A Manoliu; F Barkhof
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001-11-27       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Intracortical multiple sclerosis lesions are not associated with increased lymphocyte infiltration.

Authors:  L Bø; C A Vedeler; H Nyland; B D Trapp; S J Mørk
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.312

10.  Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  W I McDonald; A Compston; G Edan; D Goodkin; H P Hartung; F D Lublin; H F McFarland; D W Paty; C H Polman; S C Reingold; M Sandberg-Wollheim; W Sibley; A Thompson; S van den Noort; B Y Weinshenker; J S Wolinsky
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 10.422

View more
  33 in total

Review 1.  MRI monitoring of immunomodulation in relapse-onset multiple sclerosis trials.

Authors:  Frederik Barkhof; Jack H Simon; Franz Fazekas; Marco Rovaris; Ludwig Kappos; Nicola de Stefano; Chris H Polman; John Petkau; Ernst W Radue; Maria P Sormani; David K Li; Paul O'Connor; Xavier Montalban; David H Miller; Massimo Filippi
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 42.937

2.  FLAIR2: A Combination of FLAIR and T2 for Improved MS Lesion Detection.

Authors:  V Wiggermann; E Hernández-Torres; A Traboulsee; D K B Li; A Rauscher
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Current and Emerging Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis: Implications for the Radiologist, Part 1-Mechanisms, Efficacy, and Safety.

Authors:  C McNamara; G Sugrue; B Murray; P J MacMahon
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Multi-parametric neuroimaging reproducibility: a 3-T resource study.

Authors:  Bennett A Landman; Alan J Huang; Aliya Gifford; Deepti S Vikram; Issel Anne L Lim; Jonathan A D Farrell; John A Bogovic; Jun Hua; Min Chen; Samson Jarso; Seth A Smith; Suresh Joel; Susumu Mori; James J Pekar; Peter B Barker; Jerry L Prince; Peter C M van Zijl
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Accuracy of postcontrast 3D turbo spin-echo MR sequence for the detection of enhanced inflammatory lesions in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  J Hodel; O Outteryck; E Ryo; A-L Bocher; O Lambert; D Chéchin; H Zéphir; A Lacour; J-P Pruvo; P Vermersch; X Leclerc
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  MS lesions are better detected with 3D T1 gradient-echo than with 2D T1 spin-echo gadolinium-enhanced imaging at 3T.

Authors:  A Crombé; M Saranathan; A Ruet; M Durieux; E de Roquefeuil; J C Ouallet; B Brochet; V Dousset; T Tourdias
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Optimizing 3D FLAIR to detect MS lesions: pushing past factory settings for precise results.

Authors:  Augustin Lecler; C Bouzad; R Deschamps; F Maizeroi; J C Sadik; A Gueguen; O Gout; H Picard; J Savatovsky
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Infratentorial lesion volume correlates with sensory functional system in multiple sclerosis patients: a 3.0-Tesla MRI study.

Authors:  C C Quattrocchi; A Cherubini; G Luccichenti; M G Grasso; U Nocentini; B Beomonte Zobel; U Sabatini
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  Manual Segmentation of MS Cortical Lesions Using MRI: A Comparison of 3 MRI Reading Protocols.

Authors:  J Maranzano; D A Rudko; D L Arnold; S Narayanan
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Improved in vivo detection of cortical lesions in multiple sclerosis using double inversion recovery MR imaging at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Birgit Simon; Stephan Schmidt; Carsten Lukas; Jürgen Gieseke; Frank Träber; Dirk L Knol; Winfried A Willinek; Jeroen J G Geurts; Hans H Schild; Frederik Barkhof; Mike P Wattjes
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.