Literature DB >> 25572350

Substitution and pooling in visual crowding induced by similar and dissimilar distractors.

Edward F Ester1, Emma Zilber1, John T Serences2.   

Abstract

Visual crowding refers to a phenomenon whereby objects that appear in the periphery of the visual field are more difficult to identify when embedded within clutter. Pooling models assert that crowding results from an obligatory averaging or other combination of target and distractor features that occurs prior to awareness. One well-known manifestation of pooling is feature averaging, with which the features of target and nontarget stimuli are combined at an early stage of visual processing. Conversely, substitution models assert that crowding results from binding a target and nearby distractors to incorrect spatial locations. Recent evidence suggests that substitution predominates when target-flanker feature similarity is low, but it is unclear whether averaging or substitution best explains crowding when similarity is high. Here, we examined participants' orientation report errors for targets crowded by similar or dissimilar flankers. In two experiments, we found evidence inconsistent with feature averaging regardless of target-flanker similarity. However, the observed data could be accommodated by a probabilistic substitution model in which participants occasionally "swap" a target for a distractor. Thus, we conclude that-at least for the displays used here-crowding likely results from a probabilistic substitution of targets and distractors, regardless of target-distractor feature similarity.
© 2015 ARVO.

Entities:  

Keywords:  crowding; pooling; substitution

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25572350      PMCID: PMC4288309          DOI: 10.1167/15.1.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  25 in total

1.  Bayesian Model Selection and Model Averaging.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.223

2.  The effect of letter spacing on reading speed in central and peripheral vision.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision.

Authors:  L Parkes; J Lund; A Angelucci; J A Solomon; M Morgan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  A study of separation difficulty. Its relationship to visual acuity in normal and amblyopic eyes.

Authors:  J A STUART; H M BURIAN
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1962-03       Impact factor: 5.258

5.  Spatial attention, preview, and popout: which factors influence critical spacing in crowded displays?

Authors:  Miranda Scolari; Andrew Kohnen; Brian Barton; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 6.  Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate.

Authors:  Denis G Pelli; Katharine A Tillman; Jeremy Freeman; Michael Su; Tracey D Berger; Najib J Majaj
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Variability in encoding precision accounts for visual short-term memory limitations.

Authors:  Ronald van den Berg; Hongsup Shin; Wen-Chuang Chou; Ryan George; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

9.  Probabilistic, positional averaging predicts object-level crowding effects with letter-like stimuli.

Authors:  Steven C Dakin; John Cass; John A Greenwood; Peter J Bex
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Metamers of the ventral stream.

Authors:  Jeremy Freeman; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-14       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  16 in total

1.  Crowding, grouping, and object recognition: A matter of appearance.

Authors:  Michael H Herzog; Bilge Sayim; Vitaly Chicherov; Mauro Manassi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Unexpected events disrupt visuomotor working memory and increase guessing.

Authors:  R Dawn Finzi; Bradley R Postle; Timothy F Brady; Adam R Aron
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-04

3.  Crowding and Binding: Not All Feature Dimensions Behave in the Same Way.

Authors:  Amit Yashar; Xiuyun Wu; Jiageng Chen; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-09-18

4.  A Unifying Model of Orientation Crowding in Peripheral Vision.

Authors:  William J Harrison; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Contextual-Dependent Attention Effect on Crowded Orientation Signals in Human Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Nihong Chen; Pinglei Bao; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Object-based biased competition during covert spatial orienting.

Authors:  Miranda Scolari; Edward Awh
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Can (should) theories of crowding be unified?

Authors:  Mehmet N Agaoglu; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Visual crowding is a combination of an increase of positional uncertainty, source confusion, and featural averaging.

Authors:  William J Harrison; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The Temporal Dynamic Relationship Between Attention and Crowding: Electrophysiological Evidence From an Event-Related Potential Study.

Authors:  Chunhua Peng; Chunmei Hu; Youguo Chen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Effects of Exogenous and Endogenous Attention on Metacontrast Masking.

Authors:  Sevda Agaoglu; Bruno Breitmeyer; Haluk Ogmen
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.