Literature DB >> 18217822

Spatial attention, preview, and popout: which factors influence critical spacing in crowded displays?

Miranda Scolari1, Andrew Kohnen, Brian Barton, Edward Awh.   

Abstract

Crowding refers to the phenomenon in which nearby distractors impede target processing. This effect is reduced as target-distractor distance increases, and it is eliminated entirely at a distance that is labeled the critical spacing point. Attention, distractor preview, and popout are each known to facilitate processing in crowded displays. Eight experiments examined whether this is accomplished via a reduction in critical spacing. Attention was manipulated via spatial cueing, whereby a peripheral cue elicited a stimulus-driven shift of attention. Distractor preview was examined by manipulating whether the crowding distractors were presented prior to or simultaneous with the target. Popout was examined by manipulating whether there was a salient color difference between the target and distractors. As demonstrated in previous studies, we found robust benefits of spatial cueing, preview, and popout in crowded displays. However, although spatial cueing led to robust improvements in target discrimination, there was no reduction in critical spacing for attended stimuli. By contrast, both preview and popout caused large reductions in critical spacing. These disparate results indicate that attention improves target discrimination in crowded displays in a qualitatively different manner than do the other factors.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18217822     DOI: 10.1167/7.2.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  38 in total

1.  Rapid and long-lasting reduction of crowding through training.

Authors:  Amit Yashar; Jiageng Chen; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Exogenous spatial attention: evidence for intact functioning in adults with autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Michael A Grubb; Marlene Behrmann; Ryan Egan; Nancy J Minshew; David J Heeger; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 3.  Visual attention: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Crowding, grouping, and object recognition: A matter of appearance.

Authors:  Michael H Herzog; Bilge Sayim; Vitaly Chicherov; Mauro Manassi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Substitution and pooling in visual crowding induced by similar and dissimilar distractors.

Authors:  Edward F Ester; Emma Zilber; John T Serences
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Nonspecific competition underlies transient attention.

Authors:  Anna Wilschut; Jan Theeuwes; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-09-04

7.  Integrating retinotopic features in spatiotopic coordinates.

Authors:  William J Harrison; Peter J Bex
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Increased sensitivity to perceptual interference in adults with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Alexander A Stevens; Leeza Maron; Joel T Nigg; Desmond Cheung; Edward F Ester; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 2.892

9.  Experience-dependent changes in the topography of visual crowding.

Authors:  Kristin Williamson; Miranda Scolari; Sukeun Jeong; Min-Shik Kim; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Visual crowding cannot be wholly explained by feature pooling.

Authors:  Edward F Ester; Daniel Klee; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.