Literature DB >> 26628010

A Unifying Model of Orientation Crowding in Peripheral Vision.

William J Harrison1, Peter J Bex2.   

Abstract

Peripheral vision is fundamentally limited not by the visibility of features, but by the spacing between them [1]. When too close together, visual features can become "crowded" and perceptually indistinguishable. Crowding interferes with basic tasks such as letter and face identification and thus informs our understanding of object recognition breakdown in peripheral vision [2]. Multiple proposals have attempted to explain crowding [3], and each is supported by compelling psychophysical and neuroimaging data [4-6] that are incompatible with competing proposals. In general, perceptual failures have variously been attributed to the averaging of nearby visual signals [7-10], confusion between target and distractor elements [11, 12], and a limited resolution of visual spatial attention [13]. Here we introduce a psychophysical paradigm that allows systematic study of crowded perception within the orientation domain, and we present a unifying computational model of crowding phenomena that reconciles conflicting explanations. Our results show that our single measure produces a variety of perceptual errors that are reported across the crowding literature. Critically, a simple model of the responses of populations of orientation-selective visual neurons accurately predicts all perceptual errors. We thus provide a unifying mechanistic explanation for orientation crowding in peripheral vision. Our simple model accounts for several perceptual phenomena produced by crowding of orientation and raises the possibility that multiple classes of object recognition failures in peripheral vision can be accounted for by a single mechanism.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26628010      PMCID: PMC4792514          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.10.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  44 in total

1.  Attention activates winner-take-all competition among visual filters.

Authors:  D K Lee; L Itti; C Koch; J Braun
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Dynamics of spatial frequency tuning in macaque V1.

Authors:  C E Bredfeldt; D L Ringach
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Optimal representation of sensory information by neural populations.

Authors:  Mehrdad Jazayeri; J Anthony Movshon
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-16       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Locus of spatial attention determines inward-outward anisotropy in crowding.

Authors:  Yury Petrov; Olga Meleshkevich
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

6.  Crowding follows the binding of relative position and orientation.

Authors:  John A Greenwood; Peter J Bex; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Perception of contour orientation in the central fovea. I: short lines.

Authors:  D P Andrews
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06

9.  Probabilistic, positional averaging predicts object-level crowding effects with letter-like stimuli.

Authors:  Steven C Dakin; John Cass; John A Greenwood; Peter J Bex
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Metamers of the ventral stream.

Authors:  Jeremy Freeman; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-14       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  26 in total

1.  Dissociable effects of visual crowding on the perception of color and motion.

Authors:  John A Greenwood; Michael J Parsons
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Crowding and Binding: Not All Feature Dimensions Behave in the Same Way.

Authors:  Amit Yashar; Xiuyun Wu; Jiageng Chen; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-09-18

3.  Contextual-Dependent Attention Effect on Crowded Orientation Signals in Human Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Nihong Chen; Pinglei Bao; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Masking, crowding, and grouping: Connecting low and mid-level vision.

Authors:  Josephine Reuther; Ramakrishna Chakravarthi; Jasna Martinovic
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Object-based biased competition during covert spatial orienting.

Authors:  Miranda Scolari; Edward Awh
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Variations in crowding, saccadic precision, and spatial localization reveal the shared topology of spatial vision.

Authors:  John A Greenwood; Martin Szinte; Bilge Sayim; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Reply to Pachai et al.

Authors:  William J Harrison; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Can (should) theories of crowding be unified?

Authors:  Mehmet N Agaoglu; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Age-related changes in crowding and reading speed.

Authors:  Rong Liu; Bhavika N Patel; MiYoung Kwon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Visual crowding is a combination of an increase of positional uncertainty, source confusion, and featural averaging.

Authors:  William J Harrison; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.