Literature DB >> 20884479

Probabilistic, positional averaging predicts object-level crowding effects with letter-like stimuli.

Steven C Dakin1, John Cass, John A Greenwood, Peter J Bex.   

Abstract

We investigated how crowding-a breakdown in object recognition that occurs in the presence of nearby distracting clutter-works for complex letter-like stimuli. Subjects reported the orientation (up/down/left/right) of a T target, abutted by a single flanker composed of randomly positioned horizontal and vertical bars. In addition to familiar retinotopic anisotropies (e.g., more crowding from more eccentric flankers), we report three object-centered anisotropies. First, inversions of the target element were rare: errors included twice as many ±90° as 180° target rotations. Second, flankers were twice as intrusive when they lay above or below (end-flanking) compared to left or right (side-flanking) of an upright T target (an effect that holds under global rotation of the target-flanker pair). Third, end flankers induce subjects to make erroneous reports that resemble the flanker (producing a structured pattern of errors), but errors induced by side flankers do not (instead producing random errors). A model based on probabilistic weighted averaging of the feature positions within contours can account for these effects. Thus, we demonstrate a set of seemingly "high-level" object-centered crowding effects that can arise from "low-level" interactions between the features of letter-like elements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20884479      PMCID: PMC6686192          DOI: 10.1167/10.10.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  26 in total

1.  Substitution and pooling in crowding.

Authors:  Jeremy Freeman; Ramakrishna Chakravarthi; Denis G Pelli
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  The mechanism of word crowding.

Authors:  Deyue Yu; Melanie M U Akau; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Visual crowding is correlated with awareness.

Authors:  Thomas S A Wallis; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  The same binding in contour integration and crowding.

Authors:  Ramakrishna Chakravarthi; Denis G Pelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Crowding is tuned for perceived (not physical) location.

Authors:  Steven C Dakin; John A Greenwood; Thomas A Carlson; Peter J Bex
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-08-08       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Substitution and pooling in visual crowding induced by similar and dissimilar distractors.

Authors:  Edward F Ester; Emma Zilber; John T Serences
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Image correlates of crowding in natural scenes.

Authors:  Thomas S A Wallis; Peter J Bex
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Crowding follows the binding of relative position and orientation.

Authors:  John A Greenwood; Peter J Bex; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  A Unifying Model of Orientation Crowding in Peripheral Vision.

Authors:  William J Harrison; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 10.  Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition.

Authors:  David Whitney; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.