Literature DB >> 26846515

Understanding the passive leg raising test.

Anders Aneman1, Soren Sondergaard2.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26846515     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-016-4228-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


× No keyword cloud information.
  13 in total

1.  Determination of cardiac output by equating venous return curves with cardiac response curves.

Authors:  A C GUYTON
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1955-01       Impact factor: 37.312

Review 2.  Diagnostic accuracy of passive leg raising for prediction of fluid responsiveness in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies.

Authors:  Fabio Cavallaro; Claudio Sandroni; Cristina Marano; Giuseppe La Torre; Alice Mannocci; Chiara De Waure; Giuseppe Bello; Riccardo Maviglia; Massimo Antonelli
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  End-tidal carbon dioxide is better than arterial pressure for predicting volume responsiveness by the passive leg raising test.

Authors:  Xavier Monnet; Aurélien Bataille; Eric Magalhaes; Jérôme Barrois; Marine Le Corre; Clément Gosset; Laurent Guerin; Christian Richard; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Norepinephrine increases cardiac preload and reduces preload dependency assessed by passive leg raising in septic shock patients.

Authors:  Xavier Monnet; Julien Jabot; Julien Maizel; Christian Richard; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Changes in BP induced by passive leg raising predict response to fluid loading in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Thierry Boulain; Jean-Michel Achard; Jean-Louis Teboul; Christian Richard; Dominique Perrotin; Guy Ginies
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 6.  Comprehensive review: is it better to use the Trendelenburg position or passive leg raising for the initial treatment of hypovolemia?

Authors:  Bart F Geerts; Lara van den Bergh; Theo Stijnen; Leon P H J Aarts; Jos R C Jansen
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 9.452

7.  Does the central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? An updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Rodrigo Cavallazzi
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

Authors:  Maurizio Cecconi; Daniel De Backer; Massimo Antonelli; Richard Beale; Jan Bakker; Christoph Hofer; Roman Jaeschke; Alexandre Mebazaa; Michael R Pinsky; Jean Louis Teboul; Jean Louis Vincent; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Passive leg raising: five rules, not a drop of fluid!

Authors:  Xavier Monnet; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Effects of passive leg raising and volume expansion on mean systemic pressure and venous return in shock in humans.

Authors:  Laurent Guérin; Jean-Louis Teboul; Romain Persichini; Martin Dres; Christian Richard; Xavier Monnet
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  2 in total

1.  Hypotension and hypovolemia during hemodialysis: is the usual suspect innocent?

Authors:  David Berger; Jukka Takala
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 9.097

2.  The Efficacy and Safety of Phase I Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients Hospitalized in Cardiac Intensive Care Unit With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: A Study Protocol for a Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Linjing Wu; Jiahua Li; Linjian Chen; Mengmeng Xue; Yamin Zheng; Fanqi Meng; Hongfei Jiang; Zaixing Shi; Peng Zhang; Cuilian Dai
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.