Literature DB >> 27568347

The use of the oesophageal Doppler in perioperative medicine: new opportunities in research and clinical practice.

Bernardo Bollen Pinto1, Glen Atlas2,3, Bart F Geerts4, Karim Bendjelid5.   

Abstract

The oesophageal Doppler (OD) is a minimally invasive haemodynamic monitor used in the surgical theatre and the ICU. Using the OD, goal-directed therapy (GDT) has been shown to reduce perioperative complications in high-risk surgical patients. However, most GDT protocols currently in use are limited to stroke volume optimisation. In the present manuscript, we examine the conceptual models behind new OD-based measurements. These would provide the clinician with a comprehensive view of haemodynamic pathophysiology; including pre-load, contractility, and afterload. Specifically, volume status could be estimated using mean systemic filling pressure (MSFP), the pressure to which all intravascular pressures equilibrate during asystole. Using the OD, MSFP could be readily estimated by simultaneous measurements of aortic blood flow and arterial pressure with sequential manoeuvres of increasing airway pressure. This would result in subsequent reductions in cardiac output and arterial pressure and would allow for a linear extrapolation of a static MSFP value to a "zero flow" state. In addition, we also demonstrate that EF is proportional to mean blood flow velocity measured in the descending thoracic aorta with the OD. Furthermore, OD-derived indexes of blood flow velocity and acceleration, as well as force and kinetic energy, can be derived and used for continuous assessment of cardiac contractility at the bedside. Using OD-derived parameters, the different components of afterload: inertia, resistance and elastance, could also be individually determined. The integration of these additional haemodynamic parameters could assist the clinician in optimising and individualising haemodynamic performance in unstable patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Doppler technique; Haemodynamic monitoring; Intensive care; Perioperative

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27568347     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-016-9926-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  38 in total

1.  Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring by aortic blood flow measurement with the Dynemo 3000.

Authors:  J L Boulnois; T Pechoux
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Venous return at various right atrial pressures and the normal venous return curve.

Authors:  A C GUYTON; A W LINDSEY; B ABERNATHY; T RICHARDSON
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1957-06

3.  Bedside assessment of total systemic vascular compliance, stressed volume, and cardiac function curves in intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Jacinta J Maas; Michael R Pinsky; Leon P Aarts; Jos R Jansen
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Afterload assessment with or without central venous pressure: a preliminary clinical comparison.

Authors:  Glen Atlas; Jay Berger; Sunil Dhar
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng       Date:  2010-12

Review 5.  Ejection fraction revisited.

Authors:  J L Robotham; M Takata; M Berman; Y Harasawa
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Assessment of changes in left ventricular systolic function with oesophageal Doppler.

Authors:  X Monnet; J-M Robert; M Jozwiak; C Richard; J-L Teboul
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  The impact of intravenous fluid administration on complication rates in bowel surgery within an enhanced recovery protocol: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  J Zakhaleva; J Tam; P I Denoya; M Bishawi; R Bergamaschi
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 8.  Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Michael Baram; Bobbak Vahid
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Passive leg raising predicts fluid responsiveness in the critically ill.

Authors:  Xavier Monnet; Mario Rienzo; David Osman; Nadia Anguel; Christian Richard; Michael R Pinsky; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Perioperative plasma volume expansion reduces the incidence of gut mucosal hypoperfusion during cardiac surgery.

Authors:  M G Mythen; A R Webb
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1995-04
View more
  1 in total

1.  Validation of new marker of fluid responsiveness based on Doppler assessment of blood flow velocity in superior vena cava in mechanically ventilated pigs.

Authors:  Tomas Kovarnik; Miroslav Navratil; Jan Belohlavek; Mikulas Mlcek; Martin Chval; Zhi Chen; Stepan Jerabek; Otomar Kittnar; Ales Linhart
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2018-09-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.