Literature DB >> 25565622

The fiduciary relationship model for managing clinical genomic "incidental" findings.

Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz1.   

Abstract

This paper examines how the application of legal fiduciary principles (e.g., physicians' duty of loyalty and care, duty to inform, and duty act within the scope of authority), can serve as a framework to promote management of clinical genomic "incidental" or secondary target findings that is patient-centered and consistent with recognized patient autonomy rights. The application of fiduciary principles to the clinical genomic testing context gives rise to at least four physician fiduciary duties in conflict with recent recommendations by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). These recommendations have generated much debate among lawyers, clinicians, and bioethicists hence I believe this publication will be of value and interest to your readership.
© 2014 American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25565622      PMCID: PMC4312667          DOI: 10.1111/jlme.12177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Law Med Ethics        ISSN: 1073-1105            Impact factor:   1.718


  46 in total

1.  Epigenetics: a new link toward understanding human disease and drug response.

Authors:  A M Cressman; M Piquette-Miller
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Genomic incidental findings: reducing the burden to be fair.

Authors:  Velizara Anastasova; Alessandro Blasimme; Sophie Julia; Anne Cambon-Thomsen
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 11.229

3.  Point-counterpoint. Ethics and genomic incidental findings.

Authors:  Amy L McGuire; Steven Joffe; Barbara A Koenig; Barbara B Biesecker; Laurence B McCullough; Jennifer S Blumenthal-Barby; Timothy Caulfield; Sharon F Terry; Robert C Green
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Point-counterpoint. Patient autonomy and incidental findings in clinical genomics.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; George J Annas; Sherman Elias
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Reporting genomic sequencing results to ordering clinicians: incidental, but not exceptional.

Authors:  Robert C Green; James R Lupski; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Not-so-incidental findings: the ACMG recommendations on the reporting of incidental findings in clinical whole genome and whole exome sequencing.

Authors:  Megan Allyse; Marsha Michie
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 19.536

7.  Incidental findings in clinical genomics: a clarification.

Authors: 
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Managing incidental genomic findings: legal obligations of clinicians.

Authors:  Ellen Wright Clayton; Susanne Haga; Patricia Kuszler; Emily Bane; Krysta Shutske; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.

Authors:  Robert C Green; Jonathan S Berg; Wayne W Grody; Sarah S Kalia; Bruce R Korf; Christa L Martin; Amy L McGuire; Robert L Nussbaum; Julianne M O'Daniel; Kelly E Ormond; Heidi L Rehm; Michael S Watson; Marc S Williams; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 10.  We screen newborns, don't we?: realizing the promise of public health genomics.

Authors:  James P Evans; Jonathan S Berg; Andrew F Olshan; Terry Magnuson; Barbara K Rimer
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  4 in total

1.  Genomic Contraindications for Heart Transplantation.

Authors:  Danton S Char; Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz; Aliessa Barnes; David Magnus; Michael J Deem; John D Lantos
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  From "Personalized" to "Precision" Medicine: The Ethical and Social Implications of Rhetorical Reform in Genomic Medicine.

Authors:  Eric Juengst; Michelle L McGowan; Jennifer R Fishman; Richard A Settersten
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.683

3.  Looking for Trouble: Preventive Genomic Sequencing in the General Population and the Role of Patient Choice.

Authors:  Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz; John M Conley; Arlene M Davis; Marcia Van Riper; Rebecca L Walker; Eric T Juengst
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 11.229

4.  Improved ethical guidance for the return of results from psychiatric genomics research.

Authors:  G Lázaro-Muñoz; M S Farrell; J J Crowley; D M Filmyer; R A Shaughnessy; R C Josiassen; P F Sullivan
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 15.992

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.