Literature DB >> 26147254

Looking for Trouble: Preventive Genomic Sequencing in the General Population and the Role of Patient Choice.

Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz1, John M Conley, Arlene M Davis, Marcia Van Riper, Rebecca L Walker, Eric T Juengst.   

Abstract

Advances in genomics have led to calls for developing population-based preventive genomic sequencing (PGS) programs with the goal of identifying genetic health risks in adults without known risk factors. One critical issue for minimizing the harms and maximizing the benefits of PGS is determining the kind and degree of control individuals should have over the generation, use, and handling of their genomic information. In this article we examine whether PGS programs should offer individuals the opportunity to selectively opt out of the sequencing or analysis of specific genomic conditions (the menu approach) or whether PGS should be implemented using an all-or-nothing panel approach. We conclude that any responsible scale-up of PGS will require a menu approach that may seem impractical to some, but that draws its justification from a rich mix of normative, legal, and practical considerations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision making; genetics (clinical); informed consent; law; medical humanities; public health

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26147254      PMCID: PMC4493927          DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1039721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bioeth        ISSN: 1526-5161            Impact factor:   11.229


  32 in total

1.  Mandatory extended searches in all genome sequencing: "incidental findings," patient autonomy, and shared decision making.

Authors:  Lainie Friedman Ross; Mark A Rothstein; Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Point-counterpoint. Ethics and genomic incidental findings.

Authors:  Amy L McGuire; Steven Joffe; Barbara A Koenig; Barbara B Biesecker; Laurence B McCullough; Jennifer S Blumenthal-Barby; Timothy Caulfield; Sharon F Terry; Robert C Green
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Point-counterpoint. Patient autonomy and incidental findings in clinical genomics.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; George J Annas; Sherman Elias
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Frances P Lawrenz; Charles A Nelson; Jeffrey P Kahn; Mildred K Cho; Ellen Wright Clayton; Joel G Fletcher; Michael K Georgieff; Dale Hammerschmidt; Kathy Hudson; Judy Illes; Vivek Kapur; Moira A Keane; Barbara A Koenig; Bonnie S Leroy; Elizabeth G McFarland; Jordan Paradise; Lisa S Parker; Sharon F Terry; Brian Van Ness; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.718

5.  Not-so-incidental findings: the ACMG recommendations on the reporting of incidental findings in clinical whole genome and whole exome sequencing.

Authors:  Megan Allyse; Marsha Michie
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 19.536

Review 6.  Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk!

Authors:  Wylie Burke; Armand H Matheny Antommaria; Robin Bennett; Jeffrey Botkin; Ellen Wright Clayton; Gail E Henderson; Ingrid A Holm; Gail P Jarvik; Muin J Khoury; Bartha Maria Knoppers; Nancy A Press; Lainie Friedman Ross; Mark A Rothstein; Howard Saal; Wendy R Uhlmann; Benjamin Wilfond; Susan M Wolf; Ron Zimmern
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Genetic incidental findings: autonomy regained?

Authors:  Effy Vayena; John Tasioulas
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  An informatics approach to analyzing the incidentalome.

Authors:  Jonathan S Berg; Michael Adams; Nassib Nassar; Chris Bizon; Kristy Lee; Charles P Schmitt; Kirk C Wilhelmsen; James P Evans
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.

Authors:  Robert C Green; Jonathan S Berg; Wayne W Grody; Sarah S Kalia; Bruce R Korf; Christa L Martin; Amy L McGuire; Robert L Nussbaum; Julianne M O'Daniel; Kelly E Ormond; Heidi L Rehm; Michael S Watson; Marc S Williams; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 10.  We screen newborns, don't we?: realizing the promise of public health genomics.

Authors:  James P Evans; Jonathan S Berg; Andrew F Olshan; Terry Magnuson; Barbara K Rimer
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  13 in total

1.  Which Results to Return: Subjective Judgments in Selecting Medically Actionable Genes.

Authors:  Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz; John M Conley; Arlene M Davis; Anya E R Prince; R Jean Cadigan
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2017-02-01

Review 2.  Precisely Where Are We Going? Charting the New Terrain of Precision Prevention.

Authors:  Karen M Meagher; Michelle L McGowan; Richard A Settersten; Jennifer R Fishman; Eric T Juengst
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 8.929

3.  The Ethics of General Population Preventive Genomic Sequencing: Rights and Social Justice.

Authors:  Clair Morrissey; Rebecca L Walker
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2018-01-12

4.  Preventive Genomic Sequencing in the General Population: Do PGS Fly?

Authors:  Mildred K Cho
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 11.229

5.  Scrutinizing the Right Not to Know.

Authors:  Benjamin E Berkman; Sara Chandros Hull; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 11.229

Review 6.  Behavioral Genetics in Criminal and Civil Courts.

Authors:  Maya Sabatello; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  Harv Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  The Continuing Evolution of Ethical Standards for Genomic Sequencing in Clinical Care: Restoring Patient Choice.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 1.718

8.  Regulating Gamete Donation in the U.S.: Ethical, Legal and Social Implications.

Authors:  Maya Sabatello
Journal:  Laws       Date:  2015-09

Review 9.  Personal Genome Sequencing in Ostensibly Healthy Individuals and the PeopleSeq Consortium.

Authors:  Michael D Linderman; Daiva E Nielsen; Robert C Green
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2016-03-25

10.  Improved ethical guidance for the return of results from psychiatric genomics research.

Authors:  G Lázaro-Muñoz; M S Farrell; J J Crowley; D M Filmyer; R A Shaughnessy; R C Josiassen; P F Sullivan
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 15.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.