AIMS: Describe and compare patient and primary care clinician attitudes about comparative effectiveness research (CER) and inclusion of patients and clinicians as partners in clinical research. MATERIALS & METHODS: Online survey of patients (n = 900) and primary care clinicians (n = 750) from opt-in survey panels. RESULTS: Nearly half (45%) of clinicians were not familiar with CER, but after reviewing a definition of CER, most (76%) agreed that it can improve patient care. Patients and clinicians indicated interest in engagement as research partners (66% and 55%, respectively). Lack of time was the most commonly endorsed barrier. CONCLUSION: Attitudes toward CER and engagement in clinical research were generally favorable. Identified facilitators and barriers point to strategies for enhancing patient and clinician engagement in research.
AIMS: Describe and compare patient and primary care clinician attitudes about comparative effectiveness research (CER) and inclusion of patients and clinicians as partners in clinical research. MATERIALS & METHODS: Online survey of patients (n = 900) and primary care clinicians (n = 750) from opt-in survey panels. RESULTS: Nearly half (45%) of clinicians were not familiar with CER, but after reviewing a definition of CER, most (76%) agreed that it can improve patient care. Patients and clinicians indicated interest in engagement as research partners (66% and 55%, respectively). Lack of time was the most commonly endorsed barrier. CONCLUSION: Attitudes toward CER and engagement in clinical research were generally favorable. Identified facilitators and barriers point to strategies for enhancing patient and clinician engagement in research.
Authors: Charles R Elder; Lynn L Debar; Cheryl Ritenbaugh; Maureen H Rumptz; Charlotte Patterson; Allison Bonifay; Penney Cowan; Lindsay Lancaster; Richard A Deyo Journal: Perm J Date: 2017
Authors: Rachel Topazian; Juli Bollinger; Kevin P Weinfurt; Rachel Dvoskin; Debra Mathews; Kathleen Brelsford; Matthew DeCamp; Jeremy Sugarman Journal: J Comp Eff Res Date: 2016-07-15 Impact factor: 1.744
Authors: James D Harrison; Wendy G Anderson; Maureen Fagan; Edmondo Robinson; Jeffrey Schnipper; Gina Symczak; Catherine Hanson; Martha B Carnie; Jim Banta; Sherry Chen; Jonathan Duong; Celene Wong; Andrew D Auerbach Journal: Patient Date: 2018-08 Impact factor: 3.883
Authors: Susan M Rawl; Sandra Bailey; Beatrice Cork; Matthew Fields; Thomas Griffin; Laura Haunert; Judy Kline; Connie Krier; Juan Lagunes; Ruth L Lambert; Caeli Malloy; Jack Quick; Rivienne Shedd-Steele; Sylvia Strom; Lisa Carter-Harris Journal: West J Nurs Res Date: 2021-02-15 Impact factor: 1.967
Authors: Lori Frank; Laura Forsythe; Lauren Ellis; Suzanne Schrandt; Sue Sheridan; Jason Gerson; Kristen Konopka; Sarah Daugherty Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2015-01-06 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Laura P Forsythe; Lauren E Ellis; Lauren Edmundson; Raj Sabharwal; Alison Rein; Kristen Konopka; Lori Frank Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2015-07-10 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Lila J Finney Rutten; Megan A Morris; Lisa M Schrader; Sheila M Manemann; Jyotishman Pathak; Robert Dimler; Veronique L Roger Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2015-07-27 Impact factor: 2.711