BACKGROUND: Reflecting on the processes and practices used to engage community stakeholders in patient-centered outcome research strengthens participation at the project level and contributes more broadly to developing knowledge about effective participatory processes and methods. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a process evaluation of ongoing activities of a Patient Advisory Committee (PAC) formed around the development of an individualized decision aid for older women with early stage breast cancer. METHODS: In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with PAC members to obtain their input on the effectiveness of the project's participatory approach and identify barriers to participation. Results and Lessons Learned: Although there was general support for the aims of the study, patient knowledge gaps and meeting facilitation style limited participation. Members made suggestions on improving collaboration within the group that, when implemented, resulted in increased participation and revitalized interest in the project. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that engaging committee members in a process of evaluation and collective reflection during a research collaboration can break down barriers to collaboration, build relationships, create opportunities for co-learning and strengthen researchers' capacity to engage meaningfully with stakeholders.
BACKGROUND: Reflecting on the processes and practices used to engage community stakeholders in patient-centered outcome research strengthens participation at the project level and contributes more broadly to developing knowledge about effective participatory processes and methods. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a process evaluation of ongoing activities of a Patient Advisory Committee (PAC) formed around the development of an individualized decision aid for older women with early stage breast cancer. METHODS: In-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with PAC members to obtain their input on the effectiveness of the project's participatory approach and identify barriers to participation. Results and Lessons Learned: Although there was general support for the aims of the study, patient knowledge gaps and meeting facilitation style limited participation. Members made suggestions on improving collaboration within the group that, when implemented, resulted in increased participation and revitalized interest in the project. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that engaging committee members in a process of evaluation and collective reflection during a research collaboration can break down barriers to collaboration, build relationships, create opportunities for co-learning and strengthen researchers' capacity to engage meaningfully with stakeholders.
Authors: S Oliver; L Clarke-Jones; R Rees; R Milne; P Buchanan; J Gabbay; G Gyte; A Oakley; K Stein Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Laura P Forsythe; Lori Frank; Kara Odom Walker; Ayodola Anise; Natalie Wegener; Harlan Weisman; Gail Hunt; Anne Beal Journal: J Comp Eff Res Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 1.744
Authors: Amy J Schulz; Clarence C Gravlee; David R Williams; Barbara A Israel; Graciela Mentz; Zachary Rowe Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2006-05-30 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Vida A Henderson; Kathryn L Barr; Lawrence C An; Claudia Guajardo; William Newhouse; Rebecca Mase; Michele Heisler Journal: Prog Community Health Partnersh Date: 2013
Authors: Nathan D Shippee; Juan Pablo Domecq Garces; Gabriela J Prutsky Lopez; Zhen Wang; Tarig A Elraiyah; Mohammed Nabhan; Juan P Brito; Kasey Boehmer; Rim Hasan; Belal Firwana; Patricia J Erwin; Victor M Montori; M Hassan Murad Journal: Health Expect Date: 2013-06-03 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Lori Frank; Laura Forsythe; Lauren Ellis; Suzanne Schrandt; Sue Sheridan; Jason Gerson; Kristen Konopka; Sarah Daugherty Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2015-01-06 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Edith A Parker; Barbara A Israel; Melina Williams; Wilma Brakefield-Caldwell; Toby C Lewis; Thomas Robins; Erminia Ramirez; Zachary Rowe; Gerald Keeler Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Consuelo H Wilkins; Mark Spofford; Neely Williams; Corliss McKeever; Shauntice Allen; Jen Brown; Jennifer Opp; Alan Richmond; A Hal Strelnick Journal: Clin Transl Sci Date: 2013-06-10 Impact factor: 4.689
Authors: Andrea Heckert; Laura P Forsythe; Kristin L Carman; Lori Frank; Rachel Hemphill; Emily A Elstad; Laura Esmail; Julie Kennedy Lesch Journal: Res Involv Engagem Date: 2020-10-07
Authors: Kay Polidano; Linda Parton; Suneth B Agampodi; Thilini C Agampodi; Binega H Haileselassie; Jayasundara M G Lalani; Clarice Mota; Helen P Price; Steffane Rodrigues; Getachew R Tafere; Leny A B Trad; Zenawi Zerihun; Lisa Dikomitis Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2022-02-15