| Literature DB >> 33586632 |
Susan M Rawl1,2, Sandra Bailey3, Beatrice Cork3, Matthew Fields1, Thomas Griffin3, Laura Haunert1, Judy Kline1, Connie Krier1, Juan Lagunes3, Ruth L Lambert3, Caeli Malloy1, Jack Quick3, Rivienne Shedd-Steele2, Sylvia Strom3, Lisa Carter-Harris4.
Abstract
The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) defines engagement in research as the meaningful involvement of patients, caregivers, clinicians, insurers, and others throughout the entire research process-from planning to conducting the study to disseminating study results. The purposes of this paper are to (a) describe methods used to engage community members across the various phases of a PCORI-funded comparative effectiveness trial to increase colorectal cancer screening; and (b) report results of qualitative and quantitative evaluations of community advisory board members' experiences on this project. Decisions to join and stay engaged with the study included feeling valued and appreciated, being compensated, the opportunity to contribute to research based on their skills and expertise, and being committed to colon cancer prevention efforts. Challenges identified by advisory board members included the significant time commitment, transportation, and meeting location. Lessons learned and guidance for researchers committed to patient and community engagement are described.Entities:
Keywords: community advisory board; community engagement; comparative effectiveness trial; evaluation; patient engagement
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33586632 PMCID: PMC8364565 DOI: 10.1177/0193945921993174
Source DB: PubMed Journal: West J Nurs Res ISSN: 0193-9459 Impact factor: 1.967