Literature DB >> 25556313

Dense breast tissue notification: impact on women's perceived risk, anxiety, and intentions for future breast cancer screening.

Vivian M Yeh1, Julie B Schnur2, Laurie Margolies3, Guy H Montgomery2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore how women respond to the wording of dense breast tissue notifications, which are increasingly required by state law after mammography. The specific aims were to (1) determine whether perceived lifetime risk for breast cancer and intentions to undergo mammography increase after reviewing a sample notification, (2) explore individual difference variables (eg, minority status, insurance coverage) that may influence intentions for additional ultrasound screening, and (3) assess whether anxiety mediates the relationship between perceived risk and screening intentions.
METHODS: A total of 184 women aged >40 years in the United States were recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk to respond to a dense breast tissue notification as if they had personally received it.
RESULTS: After reviewing a notification, women reported greater perceived risk (d = 0.67) and intentions to undergo mammography (d = 0.25) than before. Most women intended to undergo additional ultrasound screening, although to a lesser extent when ultrasound was covered by insurance than when it was not (d = 1.03). All screening intentions were lower in women with ambiguity aversion, a tendency to avoid tests without medical consensus, and those who preferred an active decision-making role. Anxiety mediated the relationship between perceived breast cancer risk and all screening intentions.
CONCLUSIONS: Women who receive dense breast tissue notifications may generally increase their breast cancer screening intentions; however, intention strength varies depending on internal (eg, ambiguity aversion) and external (eg, insurance for ultrasound) factors. Although perceived risk increases after notification, it is anxiety that drives women's intentions for future screening.
Copyright © 2015 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dense breast tissue; anxiety; perceived risk; screening intentions

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25556313      PMCID: PMC4352389          DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  14 in total

1.  Development and testing of the health care system distrust scale.

Authors:  Abigail Rose; Nikki Peters; Judy A Shea; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Predictors of perceived breast cancer risk and the relation between perceived risk and breast cancer screening: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Maria C Katapodi; Kathy A Lee; Noreen C Facione; Marylin J Dodd
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  The California breast density information group: a collaborative response to the issues of breast density, breast cancer risk, and breast density notification legislation.

Authors:  Elissa R Price; Jonathan Hargreaves; Jafi A Lipson; Edward A Sickles; R James Brenner; Karen K Lindfors; Bonnie N Joe; Jessica W T Leung; Stephen A Feig; Lawrence W Bassett; Haydee Ojeda-Fournier; Bruce L Daniel; Allison W Kurian; Elyse Love; Lauren Ryan; Donna D Walgenbach; Debra M Ikeda
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Does worry about breast cancer predict screening behaviors? A meta-analysis of the prospective evidence.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hay; Kevin D McCaul; Renee E Magnan
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Trust in the health care system and the use of preventive health services by older black and white adults.

Authors:  Donald Musa; Richard Schulz; Roderick Harris; Myrna Silverman; Stephen B Thomas
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Decade of 'normal' mammography reports--the happygram.

Authors:  Nancy M Cappello
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Dense breasts and legislating medicine.

Authors:  Nancy Ho; Julie Kim; Vinay Prasad
Journal:  Cleve Clin J Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.321

8.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?

Authors:  Michael Buhrmester; Tracy Kwang; Samuel D Gosling
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-02-03

9.  Family and friends with disease: their impact on perceived risk.

Authors:  Guy H Montgomery; Joel Erblich; Terry DiLorenzo; Dana H Bovbjerg
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.018

10.  Aversion to ambiguity regarding medical tests and treatments: measurement, prevalence, and relationship to sociodemographic factors.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Bryce B Reeve; Richard P Moser; William M P Klein
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2009-09
View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Breast Density Knowledge and Awareness: A Review of Literature.

Authors:  Marimer Santiago-Rivas; Shayna Benjamin; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2016-02-23

2.  Breast Density Awareness and Knowledge, and Intentions for Breast Cancer Screening in a Diverse Sample of Women Age Eligible for Mammography.

Authors:  Marimer Santiago-Rivas; Shayna Benjamin; Janna Z Andrews; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Factors Affecting Physicians' Intentions to Communicate Personalized Prognostic Information to Cancer Patients at the End of Life: An Experimental Vignette Study.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Nathan F Dieckmann; Christina Holt; Caitlin Gutheil; Ellen Peters
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Acceptability of an Interactive Computer-Animated Agent to Promote Patient-Provider Communication About Breast Density: a Mixed Method Pilot Study.

Authors:  Christine Gunn; Ariel Maschke; Timothy Bickmore; Mark Kennedy; Margaret F Hopkins; Michael D C Fishman; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Erica T Warner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Breast Density Knowledge in a Screening Mammography Population Exposed to Density Notification.

Authors:  Rebecca E Smith; Brian Sprague; Louise M Henderson; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana L Miglioretti; Diana S M Buist; Karen J Wernli; Tracy Onega; Karen Schifferdecker; Gloria Jackson-Nefertiti; Dianne Johnson; Jill Budesky; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 6.240

6.  "I wish that there was more info": characterizing the uncertainty experienced by carriers of pathogenic ATM and/or CHEK2 variants.

Authors:  Kathryn G Reyes; Cheyla Clark; Meredith Gerhart; Ainsley J Newson; Kelly E Ormond
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  The Impact of Breast Density Information or Notification on Women's Cognitive, Psychological, and Behavioral Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Brooke Nickel; Tessa Copp; Meagan Brennan; Rachel Farber; Kirsten McCaffery; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Temporal changes in tolerance of uncertainty among medical students: insights from an exploratory study.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Daniel Schupack; Susannah Daggett; Christina T Holt; Tania D Strout
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2015-09-08

9.  Cloud Based Surveys to Assess Patient Perceptions of Health Care: 1000 Respondents in 3 days for US $300.

Authors:  Jonah Bardos; Jenna Friedenthal; Jessica Spiegelman; Zev Williams
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2016-08-23

10.  Mapping of Crowdsourcing in Health: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Perrine Créquit; Ghizlène Mansouri; Mehdi Benchoufi; Alexandre Vivot; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.