Literature DB >> 19731127

Aversion to ambiguity regarding medical tests and treatments: measurement, prevalence, and relationship to sociodemographic factors.

Paul K J Han1, Bryce B Reeve, Richard P Moser, William M P Klein.   

Abstract

Aversion to "ambiguity"-uncertainty about the reliability, credibility, or adequacy of risk-related information-is an important problem that may influence judgments and decisions about medical interventions. Ambiguity aversion (AA) varies among individuals, however, and has been understudied in the health domain. To explore this phenomenon further, we developed a new theory-based measure of aversion to ambiguity regarding medical tests and treatments, and examined the prevalence and association of AA with sociodemographic factors. The "AA-Med" scale was developed using a large survey sample of the U.S. public (n = 4,398), and scale psychometric properties and the population distribution of AA were evaluated. The scale demonstrated acceptable reliability (alpha = .73) and validity as ascertained by association with respondents' interest in a hypothetical ambiguous cancer screening test. Ambiguity aversion (AA) was associated with older age, non-White race, lower education and income, and female sex. The AA-Med scale is a promising new measure, and AA is associated with several sociodemographic factors. We discuss implications of these findings and potential applications of the scale for future research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19731127      PMCID: PMC4205160          DOI: 10.1080/10810730903089630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Commun        ISSN: 1081-0730


  29 in total

1.  Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable.

Authors:  S BUDNER
Journal:  J Pers       Date:  1962-03

2.  Radiologist uncertainty and the interpretation of screening.

Authors:  Patricia A Carney; Joann G Elmore; Linn A Abraham; Martha S Gerrity; R Edward Hendrick; Stephen H Taplin; William E Barlow; Gary R Cutter; Steven P Poplack; Carl J D'Orsi
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Use of consumer survey data to target cessation messages to smokers through mass media.

Authors:  David E Nelson; Meg Gallogly; Linda L Pederson; Matthew Barry; Daniel McGoldrick; Edward W Maibach
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: relationship to perceptions of cancer preventability, risk, and worry.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Richard P Moser; William M P Klein
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2006

5.  Monitoring and blunting: validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat.

Authors:  S M Miller
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1987-02

6.  Tolerance for uncertainty and perceived risk among women receiving uninformative BRCA1/2 test results.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Tiffani DeMarco; Beth N Peshkin; Sarah Rogers; Jessica Rispoli; Karen Brown; Heiddis Valdimarsdottir; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 3.908

7.  Measuring physicians' tolerance for ambiguity and its relationship to their reported practices regarding genetic testing.

Authors:  G Geller; E S Tambor; G A Chase; N A Holtzman
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Adjusting the fit: development of uncertainty scales for specific clinical populations.

Authors:  M H Mishel
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.967

9.  Early adoption of BRCA1/2 testing: who and why.

Authors:  Katrina Armstrong; Janet Weiner; Barbara Weber; David A Asch
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: associations with cancer-related perceptions and behaviours in a US population survey.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Richard P Moser; William M P Klein
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.377

View more
  31 in total

1.  Physicians' attitudes about communicating and managing scientific uncertainty differ by perceived ambiguity aversion of their patients.

Authors:  David B Portnoy; Paul K J Han; Rebecca A Ferrer; William M P Klein; Steven B Clauser
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Perceived ambiguity as a barrier to intentions to learn genome sequencing results.

Authors:  Jennifer M Taber; William M P Klein; Rebecca A Ferrer; Paul K J Han; Katie L Lewis; Leslie G Biesecker; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-05-24

3.  PUGS: A novel scale to assess perceptions of uncertainties in genome sequencing.

Authors:  B B Biesecker; S W Woolford; W M P Klein; K B Brothers; K L Umstead; K L Lewis; L G Biesecker; P K J Han
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 4.438

4.  Individual differences in aversion to ambiguity regarding medical tests and treatments: association with cancer screening cognitions.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Andrew E Williams; Amy Haskins; Caitlin Gutheil; F Lee Lucas; William M P Klein; Kathleen M Mazor
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Predictors of risk-reducing surgery intentions following genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Mary Kathleen Ladd; Beth N Peshkin; Leigha Senter; Shari Baldinger; Claudine Isaacs; Hannah Segal; Samantha Philip; Chloe Phillips; Kate Shane; Aimee Martin; Veronique Weinstein; Robert Pilarski; Joanne Jeter; Kevin Sweet; Bonnie Hatten; Elisabeth J Wurtmann; Shanda Phippen; Della Bro; Marc D Schwartz
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Factors Affecting Physicians' Intentions to Communicate Personalized Prognostic Information to Cancer Patients at the End of Life: An Experimental Vignette Study.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Nathan F Dieckmann; Christina Holt; Caitlin Gutheil; Ellen Peters
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  More Is Not Always Better: Intuitions About Effective Public Policy Can Lead to Unintended Consequences.

Authors:  Ellen Peters; William Klein; Annette Kaufman; Louise Meilleur; Anna Dixon
Journal:  Soc Issues Policy Rev       Date:  2013-01-01

8.  Dense breast tissue notification: impact on women's perceived risk, anxiety, and intentions for future breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Vivian M Yeh; Julie B Schnur; Laurie Margolies; Guy H Montgomery
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 5.532

9.  How Patients View Lung Cancer Screening. The Role of Uncertainty in Medical Decision Making.

Authors:  Marilyn M Schapira; Charu Aggarwal; Scott Akers; Jaya Aysola; Diana Imbert; Corey Langer; Charlie B Simone; Emily Strittmatter; Anil Vachani; Liana Fraenkel
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2016-11

Review 10.  Reducing the relative value of cigarettes: Considerations for nicotine and non-nicotine factors.

Authors:  Cassidy M White; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Eric C Donny
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 5.250

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.