Literature DB >> 33855648

"I wish that there was more info": characterizing the uncertainty experienced by carriers of pathogenic ATM and/or CHEK2 variants.

Kathryn G Reyes1, Cheyla Clark1, Meredith Gerhart2, Ainsley J Newson3, Kelly E Ormond4,5.   

Abstract

Little is known about what uncertainties patients experience after being identified to carry a pathogenic variant in a moderate-risk cancer gene as a result of undergoing multigene panel testing for cancer susceptibility. Data regarding cancer risk estimates and effectiveness of risk management strategies for these variants continues to evolve, which has the potential to evoke uncertainty. Acknowledging uncertainty during pre- and post-test discussions is imperative to helping individuals to adapt to their results. A better understanding of this population's experience of uncertainty is needed to facilitate such discussions and is the aim of the current study. Semi-structured interviews (30-60 min in length), informed by Han and colleagues' taxonomy of uncertainty in clinical genomic sequencing, were conducted to assess motivations to pursue genetic testing, areas of perceived uncertainty, and strategies for managing uncertainty among 20 carriers of pathogenic variants in two moderate-risk genes, ATM and CHEK2. We found that participants pursue genetic testing with the expectation that results will clarify cancer risks and approaches to management. Participants experience uncertainties aligning with Han's taxonomy relating to the ambiguity of specific cancer risk estimates and effectiveness of certain risk management strategies. These uncertainties influenced decisions around the uptake of risk management strategies, which were additionally impacted by clinicians' uncertainty towards such strategies. Participants employ a variety of uncertainty management approaches to cope with their anxieties. Clinicians may wish to use these findings to facilitate patient adaptation to the implications of multigene panel testing for cancer susceptibility during both pre- and post-test counseling sessions.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ATM; CHEK2; Cancer genetics; Genetic testing; Qualitative research; Uncertainty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33855648     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-021-00251-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  40 in total

Review 1.  Next-generation sequencing for inherited breast cancer risk: counseling through the complexity.

Authors:  Irene R Rainville; Huma Q Rana
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  A brief assessment of concerns associated with genetic testing for cancer: the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) questionnaire.

Authors:  David Cella; Chanita Hughes; Amy Peterman; Chih-Hung Chang; Beth N Peshkin; Marc D Schwartz; Lari Wenzel; Amy Lemke; Alfred C Marcus; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  Cancer risks for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from prospective analysis of EMBRACE.

Authors:  Nasim Mavaddat; Susan Peock; Debra Frost; Steve Ellis; Radka Platte; Elena Fineberg; D Gareth Evans; Louise Izatt; Rosalind A Eeles; Julian Adlard; Rosemarie Davidson; Diana Eccles; Trevor Cole; Jackie Cook; Carole Brewer; Marc Tischkowitz; Fiona Douglas; Shirley Hodgson; Lisa Walker; Mary E Porteous; Patrick J Morrison; Lucy E Side; M John Kennedy; Catherine Houghton; Alan Donaldson; Mark T Rogers; Huw Dorkins; Zosia Miedzybrodzka; Helen Gregory; Jacqueline Eason; Julian Barwell; Emma McCann; Alex Murray; Antonis C Antoniou; Douglas F Easton
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Predictive genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: psychological distress and illness representations 1 year following disclosure.

Authors:  E Claes; G Evers-Kiebooms; L Denayer; M Decruyenaere; A Boogaerts; K Philippe; E Legius
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Risk of breast cancer in women with a CHEK2 mutation with and without a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  Cezary Cybulski; Dominika Wokołorczyk; Anna Jakubowska; Tomasz Huzarski; Tomasz Byrski; Jacek Gronwald; Bartłomiej Masojć; Tadeusz Deebniak; Bohdan Górski; Paweł Blecharz; Steven A Narod; Jan Lubiński
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Pathogenic Variants in Less Familiar Cancer Susceptibility Genes: What Happens After Genetic Testing?

Authors:  Evan T Hall; Divya Parikh; Jennifer L Caswell-Jin; Tanya Gupta; Meredith A Mills; Kerry E Kingham; Rachel Koff; James M Ford; Allison W Kurian
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2018-11

7.  Penetrance of ATM Gene Mutations in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Different Measures of Risk.

Authors:  Monica Marabelli; Su-Chun Cheng; Giovanni Parmigiani
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 2.135

8.  Development of a tiered and binned genetic counseling model for informed consent in the era of multiplex testing for cancer susceptibility.

Authors:  Angela R Bradbury; Linda Patrick-Miller; Jessica Long; Jacquelyn Powers; Jill Stopfer; Andrea Forman; Christina Rybak; Kristin Mattie; Amanda Brandt; Rachelle Chambers; Wendy K Chung; Jane Churpek; Mary B Daly; Laura Digiovanni; Dana Farengo-Clark; Dominique Fetzer; Pamela Ganschow; Generosa Grana; Cassandra Gulden; Michael Hall; Lynne Kohler; Kara Maxwell; Shana Merrill; Susan Montgomery; Rebecca Mueller; Sarah Nielsen; Olufunmilayo Olopade; Kimberly Rainey; Christina Seelaus; Katherine L Nathanson; Susan M Domchek
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 9.  A Systematic Review of the Psychological Implications of Genetic Testing: A Comparative Analysis Among Cardiovascular, Neurodegenerative and Cancer Diseases.

Authors:  Serena Oliveri; Federica Ferrari; Andrea Manfrinati; Gabriella Pravettoni
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 10.  Multi gene panel testing for hereditary breast cancer - is it ready to be used?

Authors:  Andreea Catana; Adina Patricia Apostu; Razvan-Geo Antemie
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2019-07-31
View more
  2 in total

1.  Population-based estimates of age-specific cumulative risk of breast cancer for pathogenic variants in ATM.

Authors:  Anne-Laure Renault; James G Dowty; Jason A Steen; Shuai Li; Ingrid M Winship; Graham G Giles; John L Hopper; Melissa C Southey; Tú Nguyen-Dumont
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 6.466

2.  "You Always Have It in the Back of Your Mind"-Feelings, Coping, and Support Needs of Women with Pathogenic Variants in Moderate-Risk Genes for Hereditary Breast Cancer Attending Genetic Counseling in Germany: A Qualitative Interview Study.

Authors:  Claudia Stracke; Clarissa Lemmen; Kerstin Rhiem; Rita Schmutzler; Sibylle Kautz-Freimuth; Stephanie Stock
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.