Literature DB >> 25540298

MRI volume and signal intensity of ACL graft predict clinical, functional, and patient-oriented outcome measures after ACL reconstruction.

Alison M Biercevicz1, Matthew R Akelman1, Paul D Fadale1, Michael J Hulstyn1, Robert M Shalvoy1, Gary J Badger2, Glenn A Tung3, Heidi L Oksendahl1, Braden C Fleming4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical, functional, and patient-oriented outcomes are commonly used to evaluate the efficacy of treatments after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury; however, these evaluation techniques do not directly measure the biomechanical changes that occur with healing.
PURPOSE: To determine if the magnetic resonance (MR) image-derived parameters of graft volume and signal intensity (SI), which have been used to predict the biomechanical (ie, structural) properties of the graft in animal models, correlate with commonly used clinical (anteroposterior [AP] knee laxity), functional (1-legged hop), and patient-oriented outcome measures (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS]) in patients 3 and 5 years after ACL reconstruction. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.
METHODS: Based on a subset of participants enrolled in an ongoing ACL reconstruction clinical trial, AP knee laxity, 1-legged hop test, and KOOS were assessed at 3- and 5-year follow-up. Three-dimensional, T1-weighted MR images were collected at each visit. Both the volume and median SI of the healing graft were determined and used as predictors in a multiple regression linear model to predict the traditional outcome measures.
RESULTS: Graft volume combined with median SI in a multiple linear regression model predicted 1-legged hop test at both the 3- and 5-year follow-up visits (R(2) = 0.40, P = .008 and R(2) = 0.62, P = .003, respectively). Similar results were found at the 5-year follow-up for the KOOS quality of life (R(2) = 0.49, P = .012), sport/function (R(2) = 0.37, P = .048), pain (R(2) = 0.46, P = .017), and symptoms (R(2) = 0.45, P = .021) subscores, although these variables were not significant at 3 years. The multiple linear regression model for AP knee laxity at 5-year follow-up approached significance (R(2) = 0.36, P = .088).
CONCLUSION: The MR parameters (volume and median SI) used to predict ex vivo biomechanical properties of the graft in an animal model have the ability to predict clinical or in vivo outcome measures in patients at 3- and 5-year follow-up. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results from this study may enhance clinical evaluation of graft health by relating the MR parameters of volume and median SI to traditional outcome measures and could potentially aid researchers in determining the appropriate timing for athletes to return to sport.
© 2014 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL; MRI; biomechanics; clinical assessment; patient outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25540298      PMCID: PMC4344859          DOI: 10.1177/0363546514561435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  26 in total

Review 1.  MR imaging of the postoperative knee.

Authors:  Ralph Gnannt; Avneesh Chhabra; John S Theodoropoulos; Juerg Hodler; Gustav Andreisek
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the integration and maturation of semitendinosus-gracilis graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous platelet concentrate.

Authors:  David Figueroa; Patricio Melean; Rafael Calvo; Alex Vaisman; Nicolás Zilleruelo; Francisco Figueroa; Ignacio Villalón
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Accelerated versus nonaccelerated rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized, double-blind investigation evaluating knee joint laxity using roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis.

Authors:  Bruce D Beynnon; Robert J Johnson; Shelly Naud; Braden C Fleming; Joseph A Abate; Bjarne Brattbakk; Claude E Nichols
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 4.  Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults.

Authors:  Nicholas Gh Mohtadi; Denise S Chan; Katie N Dainty; Daniel B Whelan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-09-07

5.  Hop tests correlate with IKDC and KOOS at minimum of 2 years after primary ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Emily K Reinke; Kurt P Spindler; Dawn Lorring; Morgan H Jones; Leah Schmitz; David C Flanigan; Angel Qi An; Amanda R Quiram; Emily Preston; Michael Martin; Bettina Schroeder; Richard D Parker; Christopher C Kaeding; Lynn Borzi; Angela Pedroza; Laura J Huston; Frank E Harrell; Warren R Dunn
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Bone-to-bone fixation enhances functional healing of the porcine anterior cruciate ligament using a collagen-platelet composite.

Authors:  Martha M Murray; Elise Magarian; David Zurakowski; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  The effect of initial graft tension after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized clinical trial with 36-month follow-up.

Authors:  Braden C Fleming; Paul D Fadale; Michael J Hulstyn; Robert M Shalvoy; Heidi L Oksendahl; Gary J Badger; Glenn A Tung
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  The use of magnetic resonance imaging to predict ACL graft structural properties.

Authors:  Braden C Fleming; Sridhar Vajapeyam; Susan A Connolly; Elise M Magarian; Martha M Murray
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  A comparative anatomical study of the human knee and six animal species.

Authors:  Benedikt L Proffen; Megan McElfresh; Braden C Fleming; Martha M Murray
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 10.  Measures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Activity Rating Scale (ARS), and Tegner Activity Score (TAS).

Authors:  Natalie J Collins; Devyani Misra; David T Felson; Kay M Crossley; Ewa M Roos
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.794

View more
  31 in total

1.  MRI-based tendon bone healing is related to the clinical functional scores at the first year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft.

Authors:  Hong-Yun Li; Hong Li; Zi-Ying Wu; Ji-Wu Chen; Shi-Yi Chen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Functional knee assessment with advanced imaging.

Authors:  Keiko Amano; Qi Li; C Benjamin Ma
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-06

3.  Return to sport after ACL reconstruction: a survey between the Italian Society of Knee, Arthroscopy, Sport, Cartilage and Orthopaedic Technologies (SIGASCOT) members.

Authors:  Alberto Grassi; Alberto Vascellari; Alberto Combi; Luca Tomaello; Gian Luigi Canata; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-03-14

4.  MRI-based ACL graft maturity does not predict clinical and functional outcomes during the first year after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Hong Li; Jiwu Chen; Hongyun Li; Ziying Wu; Shiyi Chen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  3-T MRI mapping is a valid in vivo method of quantitatively evaluating the anterior cruciate ligament: rater reliability and comparison across age.

Authors:  Adam W Anz; Jos Edison; Thomas S Denney; Eric A Branch; Christopher R Walz; Kenny V Brock; Michael D Goodlett
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Effect of Matching or Overconstraining Knee Laxity During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction on Knee Osteoarthritis and Clinical Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial With 84-Month Follow-up.

Authors:  Matthew R Akelman; Paul D Fadale; Michael J Hulstyn; Robert M Shalvoy; Arlene Garcia; Kaitlyn E Chin; Jeffrey Duryea; Gary J Badger; Glenn A Tung; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Changes in Cross-sectional Area and Signal Intensity of Healing Anterior Cruciate Ligaments and Grafts in the First 2 Years After Surgery.

Authors:  Ata M Kiapour; Kirsten Ecklund; Martha M Murray; Brett Flutie; Christina Freiberger; Rachael Henderson; Dennis Kramer; Lyle Micheli; Laura Thurber; Yi-Meng Yen; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Predictors of Healing Ligament Size and Magnetic Resonance Signal Intensity at 6 Months After Bridge-Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair.

Authors:  Martha M Murray; Ata M Kiapour; Leslie A Kalish; Kirsten Ecklund; Christina Freiberger; Rachael Henderson; Dennis Kramer; Lyle Micheli; Yi-Meng Yen; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Return to sport after ACL reconstruction: how, when and why? A narrative review of current evidence.

Authors:  Stefano Zaffagnini; Alberto Grassi; Margherita Serra; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2015-06-08

10.  No differences in clinical outcomes and graft healing between anteromedial and central femoral tunnel placement after single bundle ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Jiahao Zhang; Yong Ma; Chaonan Pang; Haijun Wang; Yanfang Jiang; Yingfang Ao
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-09       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.