Literature DB >> 32772135

No differences in clinical outcomes and graft healing between anteromedial and central femoral tunnel placement after single bundle ACL reconstruction.

Jiahao Zhang1, Yong Ma1, Chaonan Pang2, Haijun Wang1, Yanfang Jiang1, Yingfang Ao3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes and graft healing after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with anteromedial and central femoral tunnel placement.
METHODS: During 2016 and 2018, 110 consecutive patients underwent single bundle ACL reconstruction; 85 patients met the inclusion criteria, and each patient underwent 3D-CT within 1 week and MRI 1.5 years after the operation. The central point of the femoral tunnel and signal/noise quotient (SNQ) of three regions of interest (ROI) in the intra-articular graft were measured to analyse the tunnel position and graft healing extent. Clinical assessments, including functional scores, KT-2000 arthrometer measurements and pivot-shift tests, were evaluated at the 2-year follow-up. Patients were divided into two groups depending on the femoral tunnel position: the anteromedial position group (Group A) and the centre position group (Group B).
RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were available for the 2-year follow-up and MRI examination: 34 patients in Group A and 35 patients in Group B, and 2 patients were excluded for an eccentric tunnel position. No graft failure occurred, and compared with the preoperative assessment outcomes, the outcomes of both groups improved at the final follow-up. Group A was significantly better than Group B regarding the KT-2000 arthrometer measurements (P = 0.031). No significant differences were observed in terms of functional scores, pivot-shift test results, or the SNQ between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: No differences in clinical outcomes or graft healing were found between AM and central femoral tunnel placements in single bundle ACL reconstruction. Therefore, satisfactory clinical outcomes, knee stability and graft healing can be obtained for both femoral tunnel placements. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32772135     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06206-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  40 in total

1.  Femoral insertion of the ACL. Radiographic quadrant method.

Authors:  M Bernard; P Hertel; H Hornung; T Cierpinski
Journal:  Am J Knee Surg       Date:  1997

2.  Transportal central femoral tunnel placement has a significantly higher revision rate than transtibial AM femoral tunnel placement in hamstring ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Mark Clatworthy; Steffen Sauer; Tim Roberts
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Graft bending angle is correlated with femoral intraosseous graft signal intensity in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the outside-in technique.

Authors:  Jin Hwan Ahn; Hwa Jae Jeong; Yong Seuk Lee; Jai Hyung Park; Jin Ho Lee; Taeg Su Ko
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Incorporation of Hamstring Grafts Within the Tibial Tunnel After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Suspensory Fixation Versus Interference Screws.

Authors:  Philippe Colombet; Nicolas Graveleau; Stephane Jambou
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Comparison of transtibial and retrograde outside-in techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in terms of graft nature and clinical outcomes: a case control study using 3T MRI.

Authors:  Jin Hwan Ahn; Yong Seuk Lee; Hwa Jae Jeong; Jai Hyung Park; Yohan Cho; Kwang-Jeong Kim; Taeg Su Ko
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  A comparison of clinical and radiological parameters with two arthroscopic techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  P Aglietti; G Zaccherotti; P P Menchetti; P De Biase
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Anteromedial portal versus transtibial drilling techniques in ACL reconstruction: a blinded cross-sectional study at two- to five-year follow-up.

Authors:  Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Gonzalo Samitier; Pedro Alvarez; Gilbert Steinbacher; Ramón Cugat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  MRI volume and signal intensity of ACL graft predict clinical, functional, and patient-oriented outcome measures after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Alison M Biercevicz; Matthew R Akelman; Paul D Fadale; Michael J Hulstyn; Robert M Shalvoy; Gary J Badger; Glenn A Tung; Heidi L Oksendahl; Braden C Fleming
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Hamstring Graft Incorporation According to the Length of the Graft Inside Tunnels.

Authors:  Etienne Cavaignac; Vincent Marot; Marie Faruch; Nicolas Reina; Jérôme Murgier; Franck Accadbled; Emilie Berard; Philippe Chiron
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 10.  Anteromedial versus transtibial technique in single-bundle autologous hamstring ACL reconstruction: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Haitao Chen; Kai Tie; Yongjian Qi; Bin Li; Biao Chen; Liaobin Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 2.359

View more
  1 in total

1.  Establishment of near and non isometric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with artificial ligament in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Wenhe Jin; Jiangyu Cai; Dandan Sheng; Xingwang Liu; Jun Chen; Shiyi Chen
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 5.191

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.