BACKGROUND: The quality of a repaired anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) or reconstructed graft is typically quantified in clinical studies by evaluating knee, lower extremity, or patient performance. However, magnetic resonance imaging of the healing ACL or graft may provide a more direct measure of tissue quality (ie, signal intensity) and quantity (ie, cross-sectional area). HYPOTHESES: (1) Average cross-sectional area or signal intensity of a healing ACL after bridge-enhanced ACL repair (BEAR) or a hamstring autograft (ACL reconstruction) will change postoperatively from 3 to 24 months. (2) The average cross-sectional area and signal intensity of the healing ligament or graft will correlate with anatomic features of the knee associated with ACL injury. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: Patients with a complete midsubstance ACL tear who were treated with either BEAR (n = 10) or ACL reconstruction (n = 10) underwent magnetic resonance imaging at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Images were analyzed to determine the average cross-sectional area and signal intensity of the ACL or graft at each time point. ACL orientation, stump length, and bony anatomy were also assessed. RESULTS: Mean cross-sectional area of the grafts was 48% to 98% larger than the contralateral intact ACLs at all time points (P < .01). The BEAR ACLs were 23% to 28% greater in cross-sectional area than the contralateral intact ACLs at 3 and 6 months (P < .02) but similar at 12 and 24 months. The BEAR ACLs were similar in sagittal orientation to the contralateral ACLs, while the grafts were 6.5° more vertical (P = .005). For the BEAR ACLs, a bigger notch correlated with a bigger cross-sectional area, while a shorter ACL femoral stump, steeper lateral tibial slope, and shallower medial tibial depth were associated with higher signal intensity (R2 > .40, P < .05). Performance of notchplasty resulted in an increased ACL cross-sectional area after the BEAR procedure (P = .007). No anatomic features were correlated with ACL graft size or signal intensity. CONCLUSION: Hamstring autografts were larger in cross-sectional area and more vertically oriented than the native ACLs at 24 months after surgery. BEAR ACLs had a cross-sectional area, signal intensity, and sagittal orientation similar to the contralateral ACLs at 24 months. The early signal intensity and cross-sectional area of the repaired ACL may be affected by specific anatomic features, including lateral tibial slope and notch width-observations that deserve further study in a larger cohort of patients. REGISTRATION: NCT02292004 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).
BACKGROUND: The quality of a repaired anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) or reconstructed graft is typically quantified in clinical studies by evaluating knee, lower extremity, or patient performance. However, magnetic resonance imaging of the healing ACL or graft may provide a more direct measure of tissue quality (ie, signal intensity) and quantity (ie, cross-sectional area). HYPOTHESES: (1) Average cross-sectional area or signal intensity of a healing ACL after bridge-enhanced ACL repair (BEAR) or a hamstring autograft (ACL reconstruction) will change postoperatively from 3 to 24 months. (2) The average cross-sectional area and signal intensity of the healing ligament or graft will correlate with anatomic features of the knee associated with ACL injury. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS:Patients with a complete midsubstance ACL tear who were treated with either BEAR (n = 10) or ACL reconstruction (n = 10) underwent magnetic resonance imaging at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Images were analyzed to determine the average cross-sectional area and signal intensity of the ACL or graft at each time point. ACL orientation, stump length, and bony anatomy were also assessed. RESULTS: Mean cross-sectional area of the grafts was 48% to 98% larger than the contralateral intact ACLs at all time points (P < .01). The BEAR ACLs were 23% to 28% greater in cross-sectional area than the contralateral intact ACLs at 3 and 6 months (P < .02) but similar at 12 and 24 months. The BEAR ACLs were similar in sagittal orientation to the contralateral ACLs, while the grafts were 6.5° more vertical (P = .005). For the BEAR ACLs, a bigger notch correlated with a bigger cross-sectional area, while a shorter ACL femoral stump, steeper lateral tibial slope, and shallower medial tibial depth were associated with higher signal intensity (R2 > .40, P < .05). Performance of notchplasty resulted in an increased ACL cross-sectional area after the BEAR procedure (P = .007). No anatomic features were correlated with ACL graft size or signal intensity. CONCLUSION: Hamstring autografts were larger in cross-sectional area and more vertically oriented than the native ACLs at 24 months after surgery. BEAR ACLs had a cross-sectional area, signal intensity, and sagittal orientation similar to the contralateral ACLs at 24 months. The early signal intensity and cross-sectional area of the repaired ACL may be affected by specific anatomic features, including lateral tibial slope and notch width-observations that deserve further study in a larger cohort of patients. REGISTRATION: NCT02292004 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).
Authors: Brian Forsythe; Sebastian Kopf; Andrew K Wong; Cesar A Q Martins; William Anderst; Scott Tashman; Freddie H Fu Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Mario Orrego; Catalina Larrain; Julio Rosales; Luis Valenzuela; José Matas; Juan Durruty; Hernán Sudy; Rodrigo Mardones Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Javad Hashemi; Naveen Chandrashekar; Brian Gill; Bruce D Beynnon; James R Slauterbeck; Robert C Schutt; Hossein Mansouri; Eugene Dabezies Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Robert Hudek; Silvia Schmutz; Felix Regenfelder; Bruno Fuchs; Peter P Koch Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2009-02-04 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Sebastian Kopf; Volker Musahl; Scott Tashman; Michal Szczodry; Wei Shen; Freddie H Fu Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2009-01-13 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Sean F Scanlan; Katerina Blazek; Ajit M W Chaudhari; Marc R Safran; Thomas P Andriacchi Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2009-09-02 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Steven B Cohen; Corinne VanBeek; James S Starman; Derek Armfield; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu Journal: Orthopedics Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 1.390
Authors: Volker Musahl; Olufemi R Ayeni; Musa Citak; James J Irrgang; Andrew D Pearle; Thomas L Wickiewicz Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2010-04-08 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Javad Hashemi; Naveen Chandrashekar; Hossein Mansouri; Brian Gill; James R Slauterbeck; Robert C Schutt; Eugene Dabezies; Bruce D Beynnon Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2009-10-21 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Ata M Kiapour; Sean W Flannery; Martha M Murray; Patricia E Miller; Benedikt L Proffen; Nicholas Sant; Gabriela Portilla; Ryan Sanborn; Christina Freiberger; Rachael Henderson; Samuel Barnett; Kirsten Ecklund; Yi-Meng Yen; Dennis E Kramer; Lyle J Micheli; Braden C Fleming Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2021-10-20 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Danilo Menghini; Shankar G Kaushal; Sean W Flannery; Kirsten Ecklund; Martha M Murray; Braden C Fleming; Ata M Kiapour; Benedikt Proffen; Nicholas Sant; Gabriela Portilla; Ryan Sanborn; Christina Freiberger; Rachael Henderson; Samuel Barnett; Yi-Meng Yen; Dennis E Kramer; Lyle J Micheli Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2022-10-14
Authors: Christina Freiberger; Ata M Kiapour; Shanshan Liu; Rachael N Henderson; Samuel Barnett; Nicholas J Sant; Benedikt L Proffen; Braden C Fleming; Kirsten Ecklund; Dennis E Kramer; Lyle J Micheli; Martha M Murray; Yi-Meng Yen Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2020-07-01
Authors: Samuel C Barnett; Martha M Murray; Sean W Flannery; Danilo Menghini; Braden C Fleming; Ata M Kiapour; Benedikt Proffen; Nicholas Sant; Gabriela Portilla; Ryan Sanborn; Christina Freiberger; Rachael Henderson; Kirsten Ecklund; Yi-Meng Yen; Dennis Kramer; Lyle Micheli Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2021-12-17
Authors: Joseph A Panos; Brian M Devitt; Julian A Feller; Haydn J Klemm; Timothy E Hewett; Kate E Webster Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2021-09-13