Literature DB >> 25540238

Magnetoreception in birds: the effect of radio-frequency fields.

Roswitha Wiltschko1, Peter Thalau2, Dennis Gehring2, Christine Nießner2, Thorsten Ritz3, Wolfgang Wiltschko2.   

Abstract

The avian magnetic compass, probably based on radical pair processes, works only in a narrow functional window around the local field strength, with cryptochrome 1a as most likely receptor molecule. Radio-frequency fields in the MHz range have been shown to disrupt the birds' orientation, yet the nature of this interference is still unclear. In an immuno-histological study, we tested whether the radio-frequency fields interfere with the photoreduction of cryptochrome, but this does not seem to be the case. In behavioural studies, birds were not able to adjust to radio-frequency fields like they are able to adjust to static fields outside the normal functional range: neither a 2-h pre-exposure in a 7.0 MHz field, 480 nT, nor a 7-h pre-exposure in a 1.315 MHz field, 15 nT, allowed the birds to regain their orientation ability. This inability to adjust to radio-frequency fields suggests that these fields interfere directly with the primary processes of magnetoreception and therefore disable the avian compass as long as they are present. They do not have lasting adverse after-effects, however, as birds immediately after exposure to a radio-frequency field were able to orient in the local geomagnetic field.
© 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  cryptochrome 1a; functional window; magnetic compass; magnetoreception; radio-frequency fields

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25540238      PMCID: PMC4305412          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2014.1103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  22 in total

1.  Magnetic compass orientation of European robins under 565 nm green light.

Authors:  W Wiltschko; M Gesson; R Wiltschko
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2001-09

2.  Resonance effects indicate a radical-pair mechanism for avian magnetic compass.

Authors:  Thorsten Ritz; Peter Thalau; John B Phillips; Roswitha Wiltschko; Wolfgang Wiltschko
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Magnetic compass of birds is based on a molecule with optimal directional sensitivity.

Authors:  Thorsten Ritz; Roswitha Wiltschko; P J Hore; Christopher T Rodgers; Katrin Stapput; Peter Thalau; Christiane R Timmel; Wolfgang Wiltschko
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Light-activated cryptochrome reacts with molecular oxygen to form a flavin-superoxide radical pair consistent with magnetoreception.

Authors:  Pavel Müller; Margaret Ahmad
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  The magnetic compass of domestic chickens, Gallus gallus.

Authors:  Wolfgang Wiltschko; Rafael Freire; Ursula Munro; Thorsten Ritz; Lesley Rogers; Peter Thalau; Roswitha Wiltschko
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Anthropogenic electromagnetic noise disrupts magnetic compass orientation in a migratory bird.

Authors:  Svenja Engels; Nils-Lasse Schneider; Nele Lefeldt; Christine Maira Hein; Manuela Zapka; Andreas Michalik; Dana Elbers; Achim Kittel; P J Hore; Henrik Mouritsen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Magnetic orientation of garden warblers (Sylvia borin) under 1.4 MHz radiofrequency magnetic field.

Authors:  Kirill Kavokin; Nikita Chernetsov; Alexander Pakhomov; Julia Bojarinova; Dmitry Kobylkov; Barot Namozov
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Ontogenetic development of magnetic compass orientation in domestic chickens (Gallus gallus).

Authors:  Susanne Denzau; Christine Nießner; Lesley J Rogers; Wolfgang Wiltschko
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Oscillating magnetic field disrupts magnetic orientation in Zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata.

Authors:  Nina Keary; Tim Ruploh; Joe Voss; Peter Thalau; Roswitha Wiltschko; Wolfgang Wiltschko; Hans-Joachim Bischof
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 3.172

10.  Magnetoreception: activated cryptochrome 1a concurs with magnetic orientation in birds.

Authors:  Christine Nießner; Susanne Denzau; Katrin Stapput; Margaret Ahmad; Leo Peichl; Wolfgang Wiltschko; Roswitha Wiltschko
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 4.118

View more
  17 in total

1.  Magnetic Strategies for Nervous System Control.

Authors:  Michael G Christiansen; Alexander W Senko; Polina Anikeeva
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 2.  Quantum effects in biology: golden rule in enzymes, olfaction, photosynthesis and magnetodetection.

Authors:  Jennifer C Brookes
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.704

3.  Transduction of the Geomagnetic Field as Evidenced from alpha-Band Activity in the Human Brain.

Authors:  Connie X Wang; Isaac A Hilburn; Daw-An Wu; Yuki Mizuhara; Christopher P Cousté; Jacob N H Abrahams; Sam E Bernstein; Ayumu Matani; Shinsuke Shimojo; Joseph L Kirschvink
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-04-26

4.  Very weak oscillating magnetic field disrupts the magnetic compass of songbird migrants.

Authors:  Alexander Pakhomov; Julia Bojarinova; Roman Cherbunin; Raisa Chetverikova; Philipp S Grigoryev; Kirill Kavokin; Dmitry Kobylkov; Regina Lubkovskaja; Nikita Chernetsov
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 5.  Why is it so difficult to study magnetic compass orientation in murine rodents?

Authors:  John Phillips; Rachel Muheim; Michael Painter; Jenny Raines; Chris Anderson; Lukas Landler; Dave Dommer; Adam Raines; Mark Deutschlander; John Whitehead; Nicole Edgar Fitzpatrick; Paul Youmans; Chris Borland; Kelly Sloan; Kaitlyn McKenna
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Atomistic Insights into Cryptochrome Interprotein Interactions.

Authors:  Sarafina M Kimø; Ida Friis; Ilia A Solov'yov
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 7.  Environmental sources of radio frequency noise: potential impacts on magnetoreception.

Authors:  Jesse Granger; Steven A Cummer; Kenneth J Lohmann; Sönke Johnsen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 8.  Natural environments, ancestral diets, and microbial ecology: is there a modern "paleo-deficit disorder"? Part II.

Authors:  Alan C Logan; Martin A Katzman; Vicent Balanzá-Martínez
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 2.867

9.  Spontaneous magnetic alignment by yearling snapping turtles: rapid association of radio frequency dependent pattern of magnetic input with novel surroundings.

Authors:  Lukas Landler; Michael S Painter; Paul W Youmans; William A Hopkins; John B Phillips
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Disruption of Magnetic Compass Orientation in Migratory Birds by Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields.

Authors:  Hamish G Hiscock; Henrik Mouritsen; David E Manolopoulos; P J Hore
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.