Literature DB >> 24805233

Anthropogenic electromagnetic noise disrupts magnetic compass orientation in a migratory bird.

Svenja Engels1, Nils-Lasse Schneider1, Nele Lefeldt2, Christine Maira Hein2, Manuela Zapka2, Andreas Michalik2, Dana Elbers2, Achim Kittel3, P J Hore4, Henrik Mouritsen2.   

Abstract

Electromagnetic noise is emitted everywhere humans use electronic devices. For decades, it has been hotly debated whether man-made electric and magnetic fields affect biological processes, including human health. So far, no putative effect of anthropogenic electromagnetic noise at intensities below the guidelines adopted by the World Health Organization has withstood the test of independent replication under truly blinded experimental conditions. No effect has therefore been widely accepted as scientifically proven. Here we show that migratory birds are unable to use their magnetic compass in the presence of urban electromagnetic noise. When European robins, Erithacus rubecula, were exposed to the background electromagnetic noise present in unscreened wooden huts at the University of Oldenburg campus, they could not orient using their magnetic compass. Their magnetic orientation capabilities reappeared in electrically grounded, aluminium-screened huts, which attenuated electromagnetic noise in the frequency range from 50 kHz to 5 MHz by approximately two orders of magnitude. When the grounding was removed or when broadband electromagnetic noise was deliberately generated inside the screened and grounded huts, the birds again lost their magnetic orientation capabilities. The disruptive effect of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields is not confined to a narrow frequency band and birds tested far from sources of electromagnetic noise required no screening to orient with their magnetic compass. These fully double-blinded tests document a reproducible effect of anthropogenic electromagnetic noise on the behaviour of an intact vertebrate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24805233     DOI: 10.1038/nature13290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  25 in total

1.  Uniform magnetic fields and double-wrapped coil systems: improved techniques for the design of bioelectromagnetic experiments.

Authors:  J L Kirschvink
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.010

2.  Resonance effects indicate a radical-pair mechanism for avian magnetic compass.

Authors:  Thorsten Ritz; Peter Thalau; John B Phillips; Roswitha Wiltschko; Wolfgang Wiltschko
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Polarized light cues underlie compass calibration in migratory songbirds.

Authors:  Rachel Muheim; John B Phillips; Susanne Akesson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-08-11       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Magnetic compass of birds is based on a molecule with optimal directional sensitivity.

Authors:  Thorsten Ritz; Roswitha Wiltschko; P J Hore; Christopher T Rodgers; Katrin Stapput; Peter Thalau; Christiane R Timmel; Wolfgang Wiltschko
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Chemical magnetoreception in birds: the radical pair mechanism.

Authors:  Christopher T Rodgers; P J Hore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Night-migratory garden warblers can orient with their magnetic compass using the left, the right or both eyes.

Authors:  Christine Maira Hein; Manuela Zapka; Dominik Heyers; Sandra Kutzschbauch; Nils-Lasse Schneider; Henrik Mouritsen
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Cellular telephones and cancer--a nationwide cohort study in Denmark.

Authors:  C Johansen; J Boice; J McLaughlin; J Olsen
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-02-07       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  ICNIRP statement on the "Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz)".

Authors: 
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.316

10.  Night-migratory songbirds possess a magnetic compass in both eyes.

Authors:  Svenja Engels; Christine Maira Hein; Nele Lefeldt; Helmut Prior; Henrik Mouritsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  90 in total

Review 1.  Identifying Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms for Magnetosensation.

Authors:  Benjamin L Clites; Jonathan T Pierce
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 2.  Information processing in the CNS: a supramolecular chemistry?

Authors:  Arturo Tozzi
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 5.082

3.  Polarized light modulates light-dependent magnetic compass orientation in birds.

Authors:  Rachel Muheim; Sissel Sjöberg; Atticus Pinzon-Rodriguez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Magnetic Strategies for Nervous System Control.

Authors:  Michael G Christiansen; Alexander W Senko; Polina Anikeeva
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 12.449

5.  Magnetoreception in birds: the effect of radio-frequency fields.

Authors:  Roswitha Wiltschko; Peter Thalau; Dennis Gehring; Christine Nießner; Thorsten Ritz; Wolfgang Wiltschko
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Magnetically induced behaviour of ferritin corpuscles in avian ears: can cuticulosomes function as magnetosomes?

Authors:  Petr Jandacka; Hynek Burda; Jaromir Pistora
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Compass systems.

Authors:  Nikita Chernetsov
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 8.  Magnetocarcinogenesis: is there a mechanism for carcinogenic effects of weak magnetic fields?

Authors:  Jukka Juutilainen; Mikko Herrala; Jukka Luukkonen; Jonne Naarala; P J Hore
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Magnetoreception: activation of avian cryptochrome 1a in various light conditions.

Authors:  Christine Nießner; Susanne Denzau; Leo Peichl; Wolfgang Wiltschko; Roswitha Wiltschko
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Atomistic Insights into Cryptochrome Interprotein Interactions.

Authors:  Sarafina M Kimø; Ida Friis; Ilia A Solov'yov
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.