Literature DB >> 28794163

Very weak oscillating magnetic field disrupts the magnetic compass of songbird migrants.

Alexander Pakhomov1,2, Julia Bojarinova2,3, Roman Cherbunin2,3, Raisa Chetverikova3,4, Philipp S Grigoryev3, Kirill Kavokin2,3,5, Dmitry Kobylkov4, Regina Lubkovskaja3, Nikita Chernetsov6,2,3.   

Abstract

Previously, it has been shown that long-distance migrants, garden warblers (Sylvia borin), were disoriented in the presence of narrow-band oscillating magnetic field (1.403 MHz OMF, 190 nT) during autumn migration. This agrees with the data of previous experiments with European robins (Erithacus rubecula). In this study, we report the results of experiments with garden warblers tested under a 1.403 MHz OMF with various amplitudes (∼0.4, 1, ∼2.4, 7 and 20 nT). We found that the ability of garden warblers to orient in round arenas using the magnetic compass could be disrupted by a very weak oscillating field, such as an approximate 2.4, 7 and 20 nT OMF, but not by an OMF with an approximate 0.4 nT amplitude. The results of the present study indicate that the sensitivity threshold of the magnetic compass to the OMF lies around 2-3 nT, while in experiments with European robins the birds were disoriented in a 15 nT OMF but could choose the appropriate migratory direction when a 5 nT OMF was added to the stationary magnetic field. The radical-pair model, one of the mainstream theories of avian magnetoreception, cannot explain the sensitivity to such a low-intensity OMF, and therefore, it needs further refinement.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  bird migration; garden warbler; magnetic compass; orientation; radical-pair model; radiofrequency field

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28794163      PMCID: PMC5582129          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  38 in total

1.  Resonance effects indicate a radical-pair mechanism for avian magnetic compass.

Authors:  Thorsten Ritz; Peter Thalau; John B Phillips; Roswitha Wiltschko; Wolfgang Wiltschko
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  The Radical-Pair Mechanism of Magnetoreception.

Authors:  P J Hore; Henrik Mouritsen
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 12.981

3.  Lateralized activation of Cluster N in the brains of migratory songbirds.

Authors:  Miriam Liedvogel; Gesa Feenders; Kazuhiro Wada; Nikolaus F Troje; Erich D Jarvis; Henrik Mouritsen
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Retinal cryptochrome in a migratory passerine bird: a possible transducer for the avian magnetic compass.

Authors:  Andrea Möller; Sven Sagasser; Wolfgang Wiltschko; Bernd Schierwater
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2004-11-17

5.  Anthropogenic electromagnetic noise disrupts magnetic compass orientation in a migratory bird.

Authors:  Svenja Engels; Nils-Lasse Schneider; Nele Lefeldt; Christine Maira Hein; Manuela Zapka; Andreas Michalik; Dana Elbers; Achim Kittel; P J Hore; Henrik Mouritsen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Cryptochrome expression in the eye of migratory birds depends on their migratory status.

Authors:  Leonida Fusani; Cristiano Bertolucci; Elena Frigato; Augusto Foà
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Avian magnetite-based magnetoreception: a physiologist's perspective.

Authors:  Hervé Cadiou; Peter A McNaughton
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Can a hybrid chemical-ferromagnetic model of the avian compass explain its outstanding sensitivity to magnetic noise?

Authors:  Kirill Kavokin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Re-calibration of the magnetic compass in hand-raised European robins (Erithacus rubecula).

Authors:  Bianca Alert; Andreas Michalik; Nadine Thiele; Michael Bottesch; Henrik Mouritsen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Weak Broadband Electromagnetic Fields are More Disruptive to Magnetic Compass Orientation in a Night-Migratory Songbird (Erithacus rubecula) than Strong Narrow-Band Fields.

Authors:  Susanne Schwarze; Nils-Lasse Schneider; Thomas Reichl; David Dreyer; Nele Lefeldt; Svenja Engels; Neville Baker; P J Hore; Henrik Mouritsen
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.558

View more
  9 in total

1.  Magnetoreception: activation of avian cryptochrome 1a in various light conditions.

Authors:  Christine Nießner; Susanne Denzau; Leo Peichl; Wolfgang Wiltschko; Roswitha Wiltschko
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Electromagnetic 0.1-100 kHz noise does not disrupt orientation in a night-migrating songbird implying a spin coherence lifetime of less than 10 µs.

Authors:  Dmitry Kobylkov; Joe Wynn; Michael Winklhofer; Raisa Chetverikova; Jingjing Xu; Hamish Hiscock; P J Hore; Henrik Mouritsen
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 3.  Why is it so difficult to study magnetic compass orientation in murine rodents?

Authors:  John Phillips; Rachel Muheim; Michael Painter; Jenny Raines; Chris Anderson; Lukas Landler; Dave Dommer; Adam Raines; Mark Deutschlander; John Whitehead; Nicole Edgar Fitzpatrick; Paul Youmans; Chris Borland; Kelly Sloan; Kaitlyn McKenna
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 4.  Environmental sources of radio frequency noise: potential impacts on magnetoreception.

Authors:  Jesse Granger; Steven A Cummer; Kenneth J Lohmann; Sönke Johnsen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 5.  Magnetoreception in birds.

Authors:  Roswitha Wiltschko; Wolfgang Wiltschko
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Magnetic compass of garden warblers is not affected by oscillating magnetic fields applied to their eyes.

Authors:  Julia Bojarinova; Kirill Kavokin; Alexander Pakhomov; Roman Cherbunin; Anna Anashina; Maria Erokhina; Maria Ershova; Nikita Chernetsov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Broadband 75-85 MHz radiofrequency fields disrupt magnetic compass orientation in night-migratory songbirds consistent with a flavin-based radical pair magnetoreceptor.

Authors:  Bo Leberecht; Dmitry Kobylkov; Thiemo Karwinkel; Sara Döge; Lars Burnus; Siu Ying Wong; Shambhavi Apte; Katrin Haase; Isabelle Musielak; Raisa Chetverikova; Glen Dautaj; Marco Bassetto; Michael Winklhofer; P J Hore; Henrik Mouritsen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G.

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 7.123

9.  No evidence for the use of magnetic declination for migratory navigation in two songbird species.

Authors:  Nikita Chernetsov; Alexander Pakhomov; Alexander Davydov; Fedor Cellarius; Henrik Mouritsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.