Literature DB >> 35094127

Why is it so difficult to study magnetic compass orientation in murine rodents?

John Phillips1, Rachel Muheim2, Michael Painter3, Jenny Raines4, Chris Anderson5, Lukas Landler6, Dave Dommer7, Adam Raines8, Mark Deutschlander9, John Whitehead8, Nicole Edgar Fitzpatrick10, Paul Youmans8, Chris Borland11, Kelly Sloan12, Kaitlyn McKenna8.   

Abstract

A magnetic compass sense has been demonstrated in all major classes of vertebrates, as well as in many invertebrates. In mammals, controlled laboratory studies of mice have provided evidence for a robust magnetic compass that is comparable to, or exceeds, the performance of that in other animals. Nevertheless, the vast majority of laboratory studies of spatial behavior and cognition in murine rodents have failed to produce evidence of sensitivity to magnetic cues. Given the central role that a magnetic compass sense plays in the spatial ecology and cognition of non-mammalian vertebrates, and the potential utility that a global/universal reference frame derived from the magnetic field would have in mammals, the question of why responses to magnetic cues have been so difficult to demonstrate reliably is of considerable importance. In this paper, we review evidence that the magnetic compass of murine rodents shares a number of properties with light-dependent compasses in a wide variety of other animals generally believed to be mediated by a radical pair mechanism (RPM) or related quantum process. Consistent with the RPM, we summarize both published and previously unpublished findings suggesting that the murine rodent compass is sensitive to low-level radio frequency (RF) fields. Finally, we argue that the presence of anthropogenic RF fields in laboratory settings, may be an important source of variability in responses of murine rodents to magnetic cues.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Low-level RF fields; Magnetic compass; Murine rodents; Radical pair mechanism

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35094127     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-021-01532-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  67 in total

Review 1.  Spatial cognition and the brain.

Authors:  Neil Burgess
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Magnetic compass orientation in the subterranean rodent Cryptomys hottentotus (Bathyergidae).

Authors:  H Burda; S Marhold; T Westenberger; R Wiltschko; W Wiltschko
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1990-05-15

Review 3.  Our sense of direction: progress, controversies and challenges.

Authors:  Kathleen E Cullen; Jeffrey S Taube
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Magnetic responses of the trigeminal nerve system of the bobolink (Dolichonyx oryzivorus).

Authors:  R C Beason; P Semm
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1987-09-23       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  True navigation and magnetic maps in spiny lobsters.

Authors:  Larry C Boles; Kenneth J Lohmann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-01-02       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Use of multiple orientation cues by juvenile loggerhead sea turtles Caretta caretta.

Authors:  Larisa Avens; Kenneth J Lohmann
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Does the avian ophthalmic nerve carry magnetic navigational information?

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Evolution of melanopsin photoreceptors: discovery and characterization of a new melanopsin in nonmammalian vertebrates.

Authors:  James Bellingham; Shyam S Chaurasia; Zara Melyan; Cuimei Liu; Morven A Cameron; Emma E Tarttelin; P Michael Iuvone; Mark W Hankins; Gianluca Tosini; Robert J Lucas
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Theta-modulated place-by-direction cells in the hippocampal formation in the rat.

Authors:  Francesca Cacucci; Colin Lever; Thomas J Wills; Neil Burgess; John O'Keefe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-09-22       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Grid cells form a global representation of connected environments.

Authors:  Francis Carpenter; Daniel Manson; Kate Jeffery; Neil Burgess; Caswell Barry
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic field effects in biology from the perspective of the radical pair mechanism.

Authors:  Hadi Zadeh-Haghighi; Christoph Simon
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 4.293

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.