Literature DB >> 28978441

Disruption of Magnetic Compass Orientation in Migratory Birds by Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields.

Hamish G Hiscock1, Henrik Mouritsen2, David E Manolopoulos1, P J Hore3.   

Abstract

The radical-pair mechanism has been put forward as the basis of the magnetic compass sense of migratory birds. Some of the strongest supporting evidence has come from behavioral experiments in which birds exposed to weak time-dependent magnetic fields lose their ability to orient in the geomagnetic field. However, conflicting results and skepticism about the requirement for abnormally long quantum coherence lifetimes have cast a shroud of uncertainty over these potentially pivotal studies. Using a recently developed computational approach, we explore the effects of various radiofrequency magnetic fields on biologically plausible radicals within the theoretical framework of radical-pair magnetoreception. We conclude that the current model of radical-pair magnetoreception is unable to explain the findings of the reported behavioral experiments. Assuming that an unknown mechanism amplifies the predicted effects, we suggest experimental conditions that have the potential to distinguish convincingly between the two distinct families of radical pairs currently postulated as magnetic compass sensors. We end by making recommendations for experimental protocols that we hope will increase the chance that future experiments can be independently replicated.
Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28978441      PMCID: PMC5627152          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.07.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  36 in total

1.  Resonance effects indicate a radical-pair mechanism for avian magnetic compass.

Authors:  Thorsten Ritz; Peter Thalau; John B Phillips; Roswitha Wiltschko; Wolfgang Wiltschko
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Magnetically sensitive light-induced reactions in cryptochrome are consistent with its proposed role as a magnetoreceptor.

Authors:  Kiminori Maeda; Alexander J Robinson; Kevin B Henbest; Hannah J Hogben; Till Biskup; Margaret Ahmad; Erik Schleicher; Stefan Weber; Christiane R Timmel; P J Hore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Role of exchange and dipolar interactions in the radical pair model of the avian magnetic compass.

Authors:  Olga Efimova; P J Hore
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Avian magnetic compass can be tuned to anomalously low magnetic intensities.

Authors:  Michael Winklhofer; Evelyn Dylda; Peter Thalau; Wolfgang Wiltschko; Roswitha Wiltschko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Why are living things sensitive to weak magnetic fields?

Authors:  Abraham R Liboff
Journal:  Electromagn Biol Med       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 2.882

6.  Quantum dynamics of the avian compass.

Authors:  Zachary B Walters
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2014-10-13

7.  Anthropogenic electromagnetic noise disrupts magnetic compass orientation in a migratory bird.

Authors:  Svenja Engels; Nils-Lasse Schneider; Nele Lefeldt; Christine Maira Hein; Manuela Zapka; Andreas Michalik; Dana Elbers; Achim Kittel; P J Hore; Henrik Mouritsen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Spin relaxation of radicals in cryptochrome and its role in avian magnetoreception.

Authors:  Susannah Worster; Daniel R Kattnig; P J Hore
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Millitesla magnetic field effects on the photocycle of an animal cryptochrome.

Authors:  Dean M W Sheppard; Jing Li; Kevin B Henbest; Simon R T Neil; Kiminori Maeda; Jonathan Storey; Erik Schleicher; Till Biskup; Ryan Rodriguez; Stefan Weber; P J Hore; Christiane R Timmel; Stuart R Mackenzie
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Weak Broadband Electromagnetic Fields are More Disruptive to Magnetic Compass Orientation in a Night-Migratory Songbird (Erithacus rubecula) than Strong Narrow-Band Fields.

Authors:  Susanne Schwarze; Nils-Lasse Schneider; Thomas Reichl; David Dreyer; Nele Lefeldt; Svenja Engels; Neville Baker; P J Hore; Henrik Mouritsen
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.558

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Magnetocarcinogenesis: is there a mechanism for carcinogenic effects of weak magnetic fields?

Authors:  Jukka Juutilainen; Mikko Herrala; Jukka Luukkonen; Jonne Naarala; P J Hore
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Weak radiofrequency fields affect the insect circadian clock.

Authors:  Premysl Bartos; Radek Netusil; Pavel Slaby; David Dolezel; Thorsten Ritz; Martin Vacha
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Electromagnetic 0.1-100 kHz noise does not disrupt orientation in a night-migrating songbird implying a spin coherence lifetime of less than 10 µs.

Authors:  Dmitry Kobylkov; Joe Wynn; Michael Winklhofer; Raisa Chetverikova; Jingjing Xu; Hamish Hiscock; P J Hore; Henrik Mouritsen
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 4.  Why is it so difficult to study magnetic compass orientation in murine rodents?

Authors:  John Phillips; Rachel Muheim; Michael Painter; Jenny Raines; Chris Anderson; Lukas Landler; Dave Dommer; Adam Raines; Mark Deutschlander; John Whitehead; Nicole Edgar Fitzpatrick; Paul Youmans; Chris Borland; Kelly Sloan; Kaitlyn McKenna
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Long-distance transequatorial navigation using sequential measurements of magnetic inclination angle.

Authors:  Brian K Taylor; Kenneth J Lohmann; Luke T Havens; Catherine M F Lohmann; Jesse Granger
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Low-Light Dependence of the Magnetic Field Effect on Cryptochromes: Possible Relevance to Plant Ecology.

Authors:  Jacques Vanderstraeten; Philippe Gailly; E Pascal Malkemper
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Towards predicting intracellular radiofrequency radiation effects.

Authors:  Claus Nielsen; Ron Hui; Wing-Yee Lui; Ilia A Solov'yov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Upper bound on the biological effects of 50/60 Hz magnetic fields mediated by radical pairs.

Authors:  P J Hore
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Magnetic compass of garden warblers is not affected by oscillating magnetic fields applied to their eyes.

Authors:  Julia Bojarinova; Kirill Kavokin; Alexander Pakhomov; Roman Cherbunin; Anna Anashina; Maria Erokhina; Maria Ershova; Nikita Chernetsov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Electron-Electron Dipolar Interaction Poses a Challenge to the Radical Pair Mechanism of Magnetoreception.

Authors:  Nathan S Babcock; Daniel R Kattnig
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 6.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.