PURPOSE: We compared carotid plaque calcification detection sensitivity and apparent cross-sectional area on CT as a function of CT beam energy using conventional CT techniques and virtual mono-energetic CT images generated from dual-energy acquisitions. METHODS & MATERIALS: Five ex-vivo carotid endarterectomy (CEA) specimens were imaged with dual-energy computed tomography. Virtual monochromatic spectrum (VMS) CT images were reconstructed at energies between 40-140 keV. The same specimens were imaged using conventional polyenergetic spectrum (PS) CT with peak beam energies 80, 100, 120, and 140 kVp. The histological calcium areas on each corresponding CEA specimen were traced manually on digitized images of Toluidine-Blue/Basic-Fuchsin stained plastic sections. RESULTS: 40 keV VMS CT images provided high detection sensitivity (97 %) similar to conventional PS CT images (~96 %). The calcification size measured on CT decreased systematically with increasing CT beam energy; the rate of change was larger for the VMS images than for PS images. CONCLUSION: From a single dual-energy CT, multiple VMS-CT images can be generated, yielding equivalent detection sensitivity and size correlations as conventional PS-CT in CEA calcification imaging. VMS-CT at 80-100 keV provided the most accurate estimates of calcification size, as compared to histology, but detection sensitivity was reduced for smaller calcifications on these images. KEY POINTS: • Calcifications depicted at 80-100 keV were most similar to the histology standard. • Conventional polychromatic images demonstrated excellent correlation with plaque size at pathology. • Conventional polychromatic images systematically overestimate plaque size. • Plaque calcifications can be missed on high energy monochromatic images.
PURPOSE: We compared carotid plaque calcification detection sensitivity and apparent cross-sectional area on CT as a function of CT beam energy using conventional CT techniques and virtual mono-energetic CT images generated from dual-energy acquisitions. METHODS & MATERIALS: Five ex-vivo carotid endarterectomy (CEA) specimens were imaged with dual-energy computed tomography. Virtual monochromatic spectrum (VMS) CT images were reconstructed at energies between 40-140 keV. The same specimens were imaged using conventional polyenergetic spectrum (PS) CT with peak beam energies 80, 100, 120, and 140 kVp. The histological calcium areas on each corresponding CEA specimen were traced manually on digitized images of Toluidine-Blue/Basic-Fuchsin stained plastic sections. RESULTS: 40 keV VMS CT images provided high detection sensitivity (97 %) similar to conventional PS CT images (~96 %). The calcification size measured on CT decreased systematically with increasing CT beam energy; the rate of change was larger for the VMS images than for PS images. CONCLUSION: From a single dual-energy CT, multiple VMS-CT images can be generated, yielding equivalent detection sensitivity and size correlations as conventional PS-CT in CEA calcification imaging. VMS-CT at 80-100 keV provided the most accurate estimates of calcification size, as compared to histology, but detection sensitivity was reduced for smaller calcifications on these images. KEY POINTS: • Calcifications depicted at 80-100 keV were most similar to the histology standard. • Conventional polychromatic images demonstrated excellent correlation with plaque size at pathology. • Conventional polychromatic images systematically overestimate plaque size. • Plaque calcifications can be missed on high energy monochromatic images.
Authors: M Miralles; J Merino; M Busto; X Perich; C Barranco; F Vidal-Barraquer Journal: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Date: 2006-09-18 Impact factor: 7.069
Authors: Ammar Sarwar; Johannes Rieber; Eline A Q Mooyaart; Sujith K Seneviratne; Stuart L Houser; Fabian Bamberg; O Christopher Raffel; Rajiv Gupta; Mannudeep K Kalra; Homer Pien; Hang Lee; Thomas J Brady; Udo Hoffmann Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-08-18 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Monvadi B Srichai; Ruth P Lim; Robert Donnino; Lorenzo Mannelli; Rajesh Hiralal; Ryan Avery; Corey Ho; James S Babb; Jill E Jacobs Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2012-02-24 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Alexander C Langheinrich; Marian Kampschulte; Christine Crössmann; Regina Moritz; Wigbert S Rau; Rainer M Bohle; Erik L Ritman Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2009 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Karen C Briley-Saebo; Willem J M Mulder; Venkatesh Mani; Fabien Hyafil; Vardan Amirbekian; Juan Gilberto S Aguinaldo; Edward A Fisher; Zahi A Fayad Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Wei-Hua Yin; Hong-Yue Wang; Yan Zhang; Bin Lu; Yang Sun; Xiang-Nan Li; Zhong-Fei Lu; Yun-Qiang An; Zhi-Hui Hou; Jie Zhang; Xin-Shuang Ren; U Joseph Schoepf Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2022-05
Authors: L Saba; C Loewe; T Weikert; M C Williams; N Galea; R P J Budde; R Vliegenthart; B K Velthuis; M Francone; J Bremerich; L Natale; K Nikolaou; J N Dacher; C Peebles; F Caobelli; A Redheuil; M Dewey; K F Kreitner; R Salgado Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2022-10-04 Impact factor: 7.034
Authors: Navneet Singh; Alan R Moody; Idan Roifman; David A Bluemke; Anna E H Zavodni Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-08-21 Impact factor: 2.357