M Miralles1, J Merino, M Busto, X Perich, C Barranco, F Vidal-Barraquer. 1. Department of Vascular Surgery, Universidad Autonoma de Barcelona, Hospital Universitario de Mar, Passeig Marítim 27-29, 0803 Barcelona, Spain. mirallesm@telefonica.net
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of CT-angiography for identification and measurement of calcification of carotid atherosclerotic plaques and to characterise the content and distribution pattern of mineral calcium (hydroxyapatite, Ca) in carotid bifurcations and investigate its relationship with neurological symptoms. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with ICA stenosis > 60% (13 symptomatic, 13 asymptomatic) were selected for study. Ca was estimated from the weight of the ashed remnants of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) specimens in 11 patients. Calcium content (calcification volume (mm3),CV), and average calcium density (Hounsfield units (HU),CD), were determined by CT-angiography. The distribution pattern of calcium within the lesion (base (posterior), shoulder or luminal surface) was assessed in all cases. RESULTS: CT-derived estimation of CV and Ca mass (modified Agatston Score, (mAS) = CV x CD) showed a good correlation with its direct measurement in CEA specimens (r = 0.911 and 0.993 respectively, p < 0,005). Asymptomatic patients with ICA stenosis > 60% showed statistically significant higher content of Ca than those who were symptomatic (mAS: 122.6 +/- 138.0 HU mm3 vs 42.8 +/- 59.1 HU mm3, p = 0.04). Calcification on the surface of the plaque was observed more commonly in asymptomatic patients (9/12 vs 3/15, p = 0.006). Non-calcified or plaques with posterior calcification were 12 times more likely to be symptomatic (OR: 12, 95%CI 1.5-91.1, p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: CT-angiography permits the reliable quantification of calcification of carotid plaques. A lower content of calcium in carotid plaques, as well as its distribution in the base of the lesion, was associated with a greater prevalence of neurological symptoms. These parameters may be useful to identify those patients at higher risk of stroke.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of CT-angiography for identification and measurement of calcification of carotid atherosclerotic plaques and to characterise the content and distribution pattern of mineral calcium (hydroxyapatite, Ca) in carotid bifurcations and investigate its relationship with neurological symptoms. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with ICA stenosis > 60% (13 symptomatic, 13 asymptomatic) were selected for study. Ca was estimated from the weight of the ashed remnants of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) specimens in 11 patients. Calcium content (calcification volume (mm3),CV), and average calcium density (Hounsfield units (HU),CD), were determined by CT-angiography. The distribution pattern of calcium within the lesion (base (posterior), shoulder or luminal surface) was assessed in all cases. RESULTS: CT-derived estimation of CV and Ca mass (modified Agatston Score, (mAS) = CV x CD) showed a good correlation with its direct measurement in CEA specimens (r = 0.911 and 0.993 respectively, p < 0,005). Asymptomatic patients with ICA stenosis > 60% showed statistically significant higher content of Ca than those who were symptomatic (mAS: 122.6 +/- 138.0 HU mm3 vs 42.8 +/- 59.1 HU mm3, p = 0.04). Calcification on the surface of the plaque was observed more commonly in asymptomatic patients (9/12 vs 3/15, p = 0.006). Non-calcified or plaques with posterior calcification were 12 times more likely to be symptomatic (OR: 12, 95%CI 1.5-91.1, p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: CT-angiography permits the reliable quantification of calcification of carotid plaques. A lower content of calcium in carotid plaques, as well as its distribution in the base of the lesion, was associated with a greater prevalence of neurological symptoms. These parameters may be useful to identify those patients at higher risk of stroke.
Authors: Kiran R Nandalur; Andrew D Hardie; Prashant Raghavan; Matthew J Schipper; Erol Baskurt; Christopher M Kramer Journal: Stroke Date: 2007-02-01 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: H A Marquering; C B L M Majoie; L Smagge; A G Kurvers; H A Gratama van Andel; R van den Berg; P J Nederkoorn Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-06-09 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Cheuk F Chan; Niall G Keenan; Sonia Nielles-Vallespin; Peter Gatehouse; Mary N Sheppard; Joseph J Boyle; Dudley J Pennell; David N Firmin Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2010-03-26 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Lorenzo Mannelli; Lawrence MacDonald; Marcello Mancini; Marina Ferguson; William P Shuman; Monica Ragucci; Serena Monti; Dongxiang Xu; Chun Yuan; Lee M Mitsumori Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-12-24 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Danijela Vukadinovic; Sietske Rozie; Marjon van Gils; Theo van Walsum; Rashindra Manniesing; Aad van der Lugt; Wiro J Niessen Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2011-05-26 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Shiying Wang; Sunil Unnikrishnan; Elizabeth B Herbst; Alexander L Klibanov; Frank William Mauldin; John A Hossack Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Lorenzo Mannelli; Lee M Mitsumori; Marina Ferguson; Dongxiang Xu; Baocheng Chu; Kelley R Branch; William P Shuman; Chun Yuan Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2012-08-21 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: M Wintermark; S S Jawadi; J H Rapp; T Tihan; E Tong; D V Glidden; S Abedin; S Schaeffer; G Acevedo-Bolton; B Boudignon; B Orwoll; X Pan; D Saloner Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2008-02-13 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Fisnik Jashari; Pranvera Ibrahimi; Elias Johansson; Jan Ahlqvist; Conny Arnerlöv; Maria Garoff; Eva Levring Jäghagen; Per Wester; Michael Y Henein Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2015-08-21 Impact factor: 5.923