Literature DB >> 25535742

Evaluation of the cardiotoxicity of mitragynine and its analogues using human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes.

Jun Lu1, Heming Wei2, Jianjun Wu1, Mohd Fadzly Amar Jamil3, Mei Lan Tan4, Mohd Ilham Adenan5, Philip Wong2, Winston Shim2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Mitragynine is a major bioactive compound of Kratom, which is derived from the leave extracts of Mitragyna speciosa Korth or Mitragyna speciosa (M. speciosa), a medicinal plant from South East Asia used legally in many countries as stimulant with opioid-like effects for the treatment of chronic pain and opioid-withdrawal symptoms. Fatal incidents with Mitragynine have been associated with cardiac arrest. In this study, we determined the cardiotoxicity of Mitragynine and other chemical constituents isolated using human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs). METHODS AND
RESULTS: The rapid delayed rectifier potassium current (IKr), L-type Ca2+ current (ICa,L) and action potential duration (APD) were measured by whole cell patch-clamp. The expression of KCNH2 and cytotoxicity was determined by real-time PCR and Caspase activity measurements. After significant IKr suppression by Mitragynine (10 µM) was confirmed in hERG-HEK cells, we systematically examined the effects of Mitragynine and other chemical constituents in hiPSC-CMs. Mitragynine, Paynantheine, Speciogynine and Speciociliatine, dosage-dependently (0.1∼100 µM) suppressed IKr in hiPSC-CMs by 67%∼84% with IC50 ranged from 0.91 to 2.47 µM. Moreover, Mitragynine (10 µM) significantly prolonged APD at 50 and 90% repolarization (APD50 and APD90) (439.0±11.6 vs. 585.2±45.5 ms and 536.0±22.6 vs. 705.9±46.1 ms, respectively) and induced arrhythmia, without altering the L-type Ca2+ current. Neither the expression, and intracellular distribution of KCNH2/Kv11.1, nor the Caspase 3 activity were significantly affected by Mitragynine.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that Mitragynine and its analogues may potentiate Torsade de Pointes through inhibition of IKr in human cardiomyocytes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25535742      PMCID: PMC4275233          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Kratom is derived from leave extracts of Mitragyna speciosa Korth (M. speciosa), which is widely found in tropical and subtropical regions of Asia and it has been used as folk medicine since the 19th century. [1]–[3] It is known to have opiate- and cocaine-like effects and has been traditionally used as a stimulant, analgesia, and a substitute for opiate addicts to alleviate withdrawal symptoms and other conditions. [4]–[8] Other known applications of Kratom include anti-inflammatory, antipyretic, antitussive, antihypertensive, local anesthetic, and hypoglycemic control [2], [9]–[11]. Kratom is legally accessible without a prescription in many countries and remains popular for recreational use in the United Kingdom. [12] Long-term administration of Kratom has been associated with opioid misuse, abuse, dependence and addiction [6] with symptoms such as anorexia, weight loss and insomnia. [13]–[14] Kratom and its related products have been associated with drug toxicity with life-threatening consequences [12] including seizure. [15] Death from drug toxicity has been reported in which Kratom was used together with O-desmethyltramadol [16] and Propylhexedrine. [17] However, cardiotoxicity of Kratom and its derivatives is not well understood. Drug-induced blockage of the human Ether-à-go-go-Related Gene (hERG) channel in the heart is a major risk of cardiotoxicity. hERG or KCNH2 encodes the alpha subunit of a potassium ion channel that mediates the rapid outward delayed rectifier potassium current (I Kr). [18] Cardiotoxicity assessment using hERG-overexpressing human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells has been commonly utilized though human cardiomyocytes may be a more pertinent model as both I Kr and the action potential duration (APD) could be determined. However, cardiomyocytes from human heart are virtually unavailable due to technical hurdles and safety concerns. Recent progress in generating human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) from somatic cells by reprogramming helps to create a unique source of functional human cardiomyocytes named hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) generated via cardiomyogenic differentiation of hiPSCs. [19] hiPSC-CMs have ionic currents characteristics resembling those reported for adult human cardiomyocytes. [20], [21] They have been successfully adopted in disease modeling of long QT syndrome (LQTS) and drug testing [22]. In this study, we investigate the cardiotoxicty of Mitragynine and its analogues by studying their effects on hERG and APD. Our data show that Mitragynine and its analogues, at concentrations close to the plasma levels reported in lethal cases, [16], [23] exert a significant cardiotoxicity by inhibiting hERG current, prolonging APD and inducing arrhythmia.

Materials and Methods

Isolation of Mitragynine and its analogues

The fresh leaves of M. speciosa Korth (Rubiaceae) were collected from the state of Perlis, Malaysia, with permission from the Narcotic Unit, Royal Malaysian Police (PDRM). The approval to carry out research on Mitragynine was obtained from the Ministry of Health, Malaysia. Detailed method for isolation and purification of Mitragynine and its analogues was shown in S1 Methods. As previously described by Takayama and co-workers, [24] the naturally occurring indole alkaloid, Mitragynine and its analogues, Paynanthiene, Speciogynine, and Speciociliatine, belong to the class of corynanthe alkaloids. The structure and identity of the compounds were confirmed using 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR analysis (see S1 Methods). The molecular structures of these compounds are shown in Fig. 1. In this study, Mitragynine and its analogues were used for cardiotoxicity testing.
Figure 1

Structure of Mitragynine and analogues.

Cells and cell culture

Stable transgenic hERG-HEK293 cells (hERG-HEK, EZCellsTM) were purchased from ChanTest (Cleveland, USA) and maintained following the manufacturer’s instruction. Human hiPSC-CMs (iCell Cardiomyocytes and hereby named iCell) were obtained from Cellular Dynamics International Inc (Madison, USA). Detail cultural methods were described in the S1 Methods.

Patch-clamp assays

Patch-clamp technique was performed for recording K+ and Ca2+ currents and action potentials. The signals were amplified using Axon 200B patch clamp amplifier (Axon instrument, USA) and low-pass filtered at 5 kHz. Data acquisition was achieved using the Digidata 1440A (Axon instruments Inc, USA). Borosilicate glass electrodes (1.5 mm OD) were pulled by a horizontal puller (Model P-97, Sutter Instrument, USA) and fired-polished to a final resistance of 2–3 MΩ when filled with internal solution. After a gigaohm-seal was obtained by negative pressure suction, the cell membrane was ruptured by a gentle suction to establish whole-cell configuration with seal resistance >1000 MΩ. The series resistance was compensated by 50–70% to minimize voltage errors. Cardiomyocyte cell membrane capacitance averaged 64.3±2.5 pF. Cells were maintained at 35–37°C during the recording by a temperature controller (Warner Instruments) except for I Ca,L recordings that were performed at room temperature. For current clamp experiments, APs were recorded in hiPSC-CMs under current gate in normal Tyrode’s solution containing (in mM): NaCl 140, KCl 5.4, CaCl2 1.8, MgCl2 1, glucose 10, HEPES10, adjusted to pH 7.40 with NaOH. Pipettes solution contained (in mM): KCl 130, NaCl 5, MgCl2 1, MgATP 3, EGTA 10, and HEPES 10, adjusted to pH 7.20 with KOH. hiPSC-CMs were paced at 0.2 and 1.0 Hz. For voltage clamp experiments of hiPSC-CMs, the external solution used for measurements I Kr was composed of the following (in mM): NaCl 140, KCl 5.4, CaCl2 1.8, MgCl2 1, glucose 10, HEPES 10, Nifedipine 0.001, Chromanol 293B 0.01, adjusted to pH 7.40 with NaOH. [25], [26] For recording I Ca,L, external solution contained (in mM): NaCl 140, CsCl 10, CaCl2 1.8, MgCl2 1, glucose 10, HEPES 10, adjusted to pH 7.40 with NaOH. Pipettes solution for I Kr recordings contained (in mM): KCl 130, MgCl2 1, MgATP 3, EGTA 10, and HEPES 10, adjusted to pH 7.20 with KOH. Pipettes solution for I Ca,L recordings contained (in mM): CsCl 120, MgCl2 3, MgATP 5, EGTA 10, HEPES 5, adjusted to pH 7.20 with CsOH. Ion currents were analyzed and fitted using the Clampfit 10.0 (Axon Instruments Inc, USA) and Origin 7.0 software (Originlab Corporation). To measure the activation time constant of voltage-activated K+ current, I kr in hiPSC-CMs (n = 4) was elicited by a step to 20 mV for 2 s from a holding potential of–50 mV, and the tail current was recorded after the step to −50 mV lasting 4 s. To measure the activation time constant of voltage-activated L type Ca2+ current, I Ca,L in hiPSC-CMs (n = 4) was clamped to 10 mV from a holding potential of −70 mV for 500 ms. Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR), Caspase 3 activity measurement and immunocytochemistry. Detail methods were described in and .

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was analyzed using a Student t test or one-way ANOVA followed up with Tukey tests. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Mitragynine suppressed I kr in hERG-expressing HEK293 cells

The effect of Mitragynine was tested in hERG-HEK cells ( ). Compared with control, Mitragynine (10 µM) treated cells demonstrated a significant reduction in tail current amplitude (pA/pF) measured at 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 mV (88.66±12.21 vs. 42.08±6.32; 88.63±12.61 vs. 42.25±6.09; 89.17±12.84 vs. 42.24±5.95; 89.36±13.10 vs. 42.36±6.04; and 89.32±13.38 vs. 41.75±6.40; n = 8, P<0.05) ( ). Moreover, it was noted that Mitragynine (10 µM) treatment significantly shifted the voltage-dependent steady-state inactivation curve towards more negative potentials with a ∼13 mV shift in half-inactivation voltage documented (V1/2 −49.5±2.8 mV in controls and −62.3±5.0 mV after Mitragynine, P<0.05, n = 8). Slope factors did not differ significantly ( ). For measuring the steady-state inactivation, conditioning pulses between −120 and +20 mV in 10 mV increments for 20 milliseconds were applied after a depolarizing pulse to +20 mV for 900 milliseconds, followed by a common test pulse to +20 mV. The voltage protocol is illustrated in the inset. More protocols for the voltage clamp of hERG-HEK293 and data analysis were described in the .
Figure 2

Mitragynine suppressed I Kr in hERG-HEK cells.

The effect of Mitragynine was tested in hERG-HEK cells. (A) The time-course and wash out of Mitragynine (n = 4). The insert is the voltage protocol used to elicit hERG. (B) A representative I kr peak tail current traces recorded with Mitragynine (10 µM) treatment. The insert is the voltage protocol used to elicit hERG. (C) The I-V curve of I kr tail currents recorded in hERG-HEK cells prior to and post Mitragynine treatment. *p<0.05. Data represent are the whole cell currents (raw current) uncorrected for the presence of background currents. (D) The steady-state inactivation properties of I Kr in hERG-HEK293 cells. Conditioning pulses between −120 and +20 mV in 10 mV increments for 20 milliseconds were applied after a depolarizing pulse to +20 mV for 900 milliseconds, followed by a common test pulse to +20 mV. The voltage protocol is illustrated in the inset. *p<0.05 (n = 5). The voltage protocol is illustrated in the inset.

Mitragynine suppressed I Kr in hERG-HEK cells.

The effect of Mitragynine was tested in hERG-HEK cells. (A) The time-course and wash out of Mitragynine (n = 4). The insert is the voltage protocol used to elicit hERG. (B) A representative I kr peak tail current traces recorded with Mitragynine (10 µM) treatment. The insert is the voltage protocol used to elicit hERG. (C) The I-V curve of I kr tail currents recorded in hERG-HEK cells prior to and post Mitragynine treatment. *p<0.05. Data represent are the whole cell currents (raw current) uncorrected for the presence of background currents. (D) The steady-state inactivation properties of I Kr in hERG-HEK293 cells. Conditioning pulses between −120 and +20 mV in 10 mV increments for 20 milliseconds were applied after a depolarizing pulse to +20 mV for 900 milliseconds, followed by a common test pulse to +20 mV. The voltage protocol is illustrated in the inset. *p<0.05 (n = 5). The voltage protocol is illustrated in the inset.

Mitragynine and its analogues suppressed I kr in hiPSC-CMs

In human cardiomyocytes, I Kr is a major component in the tail current of the outward rectifier potassium currents (I K). I Kr currents were elicited by depolarizing steps between −40 mV and 50 mV with a 10 mV increments for 2 s from the holding potential at −50 mV. Tail current was recorded after the test potential was reverted to −50 mV lasting for 4 s. The I Kr currents activation curves were generated by plotting the normalized tail current amplitudes against the step potentials and were fitted with a Boltzmann equation: I = I×[1+exp(V–V)/κ]−1, where I is maximum amplitude, V and κ are half-activation voltage and the slope factor. I Kr was activated at −40 mV and reaching maximum at approximately 0 mV and at more positive voltages inward rectification was present because of voltage-dependent rapid inactivation. To determining the steady-state inactivation properties of the I kr (hERG) in hiPSC-CMs, conditioning pulses between −130 and +30 mV in 10 mV increments for 5 milliseconds were applied after a depolarizing pulse to +30 mV for 900 milliseconds, followed by a common test pulse to +30 mV. The corrected steady-state inactivation curves were fitted with a Boltzmann function in the following form: I/(Imax–Imin) = I/{1+exp[(Vt–V1/2)/K]}+Imin. Where I is the amplitude of inactivating current corrected for deactivation, Imax is the maximum of I, Imin is the minimum of I, Vt is the pre-pulse of test potential, V1/2 is the voltage at which I is half of max, and k is the slope factor. Experiments were performed at room temperature. The effects of Mitragynine and its analogues on I Kr were measured in hiPSC-CMs ( ) hERG currents were activated with a step to 20 mV for 2 s, and tail current was recorded after stepping to −50 mV for 4 s. I Kr was quantified by fitting the Hill equation: I compound/I control = 1/[1+(D/IC50)n], where D is the compound concentration, IC50 is the drug concentration for 50% inhibition, and n is the Hill coefficient. Cultured hiPSC-CMs were exposed to Mitragynine, Paynantheine, Speciogynine and Speciociliatine at 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 and 100 µM and I kr was recorded 2 minutes later. The IC50 for all 4 compounds were 0.91, 2.47, 1.02 and 1.48 µM, respectively ( ). At 100 µM, Mitragynine, Paynantheine, Speciogynine and Speciociliatine registered a maximum inhibition of the I K tail current by 67.0±9.41%, 69.91±3.09%, 68.01±3.95%, and 83.74±5.74%, respectively ( , ). All compounds exert similar magnitudes of inhibition on I kr tail current. As a negative control, Nifedipine (a L-type Ca2+ channel blocker), which is known not to inhibit I kr, consistently failed to show any significant effects on hERG ( ). Furthermore, Mitragynine did not shift the half-activation voltage of I kr in hiPSC-CMs ( ). However, similar to that observed in hERG-HEK293 cells, Mitragynine (10 µM) treatment led to a ∼10 mV negative shift in the voltage-dependent steady state inactivation (V1/2 −69.15±2.21 mV in controls vs. −79.04±2.64 mV after Mitragynine; P<0.05, n = 5) of I kr. However, slope factor did not differ significantly post treatment ( ).
Figure 3

Mitragynine and its analogues suppressed I Kr in hiPSC-CMs.

(A) The time-course and wash out experiments in Mitragynine (n = 4). (B) The concentration dependence relationships of I kr peak tail current to Mitragynine, Paynantheine, Speciogynine and Speciociliatine with IC50 registered as 0.91, 2.47, 1.02 and 1.48 µM, respectively. (C) Voltage protocol (upper) used to elicit hERG and I k peak tail current traces with Mitragynine (middle) and nifedipine (bottom) exposure. Representative traces represent the whole cell currents (raw current) uncorrected for the presence of background currents. (D) Normalized steady-state activation curves of I Kr tail current prior to and post application of 10 µM Mitragynine (n = 5). (E) The steady-state inactivation properties of I Kr in hiPSC-CMs. Conditioning pulses between −130 and +30 mV in 10 mV increments for 5 milliseconds were applied after a depolarizing pulse to +30 mV for 900 milliseconds, followed by a common test pulse to +30 mV. The voltage protocol is illustrated in the inset. *p<0.05 (n = 5).

Table 1

Inhibition of Mitragynine and its analogues on I Kr tail current in hiPSC-CMs.

Compounds% inhibition0.01 uM0.1 uM1 uM10 uM100 uM
Mitragynine Ave7.63%11.48%39.83%53.55%67.06%
(n = 12) SEM4.18%5.37%9.55%6.51%9.41%
P value0.07160.03880.00040.00000.0000
Paynantheine Ave12.21%25.71%32.70%59.34%69.91%
(n = 11) SEM6.79%7.34%6.27%6.77%3.09%
P value0.07560.00150.00000.00000.0000
Speciogynine Ave9.81%21.73%41.22%57.24%68.01%
(n = 13) SEM3.99%6.30%6.01%3.30%3.95%
P value0.01400.00320.00000.00000.0000
Speciociliaitine Ave24.52%33.77%42.51%79.21%83.74%
(n = 14) SEM8.28%9.70%5.67%3.53%5.74%
P value0.00460.00250.00000.00000.0000

Mitragynine and its analogues suppressed I Kr in hiPSC-CMs.

(A) The time-course and wash out experiments in Mitragynine (n = 4). (B) The concentration dependence relationships of I kr peak tail current to Mitragynine, Paynantheine, Speciogynine and Speciociliatine with IC50 registered as 0.91, 2.47, 1.02 and 1.48 µM, respectively. (C) Voltage protocol (upper) used to elicit hERG and I k peak tail current traces with Mitragynine (middle) and nifedipine (bottom) exposure. Representative traces represent the whole cell currents (raw current) uncorrected for the presence of background currents. (D) Normalized steady-state activation curves of I Kr tail current prior to and post application of 10 µM Mitragynine (n = 5). (E) The steady-state inactivation properties of I Kr in hiPSC-CMs. Conditioning pulses between −130 and +30 mV in 10 mV increments for 5 milliseconds were applied after a depolarizing pulse to +30 mV for 900 milliseconds, followed by a common test pulse to +30 mV. The voltage protocol is illustrated in the inset. *p<0.05 (n = 5). The current-voltage relationship for I Kr measured at the end of the depolarizing step was determined ( ). The peak step current density of I Kr was 0.83±0.18 pA/pF ( , left). The I Kr tail current was maximum after voltage steps positive to 0 mV ( , right). The half-maximal activation voltage (V) for I Kr was −18.6±0.91 mV. The normalized tail current density/voltage relationships of I Kr were in agreement with previously reported characteristic kinetics of I Kr [25], [26].

Mitragynine prolonged action potential duration in hiPSC-CMs

Ventricular-like hiPSC-CMs were identified by their characteristic AP traces ( and ). shows the typical AP trace of ventricular-like hiPSC-CMs paced at 1 Hz. Mitragynine (10 µM) significantly prolonged AP duration at 50% and 90% repolarization (APD50 and APD90 respectively). Moreover, sporadic early afterdepolarizations (EADs) was induced by 10 µM Mitragynine in hiPSC-CMs paced at 0.2 Hz ( .1) and frequent EADs were induced by 100 µM Mitragynine (a concentration that exerted the highest inhibition of hERG) in spontaneously contracting hiPSC-CMs and the EADs disappeared after wash out of Mitragynine ( .2).
Figure 4

Mitragynine prolonged action potential duration in hiPSC-CMs.

(A) APs were recorded prior to and post application of 10 µM Mitragynine in ventricular-like hiPSC-CMs paced at 1 Hz. Overlay of single AP from the same cell prior to and post Mitragynine treatment (right) is presented. The table inserted below represents the AP properties. (B1) Mitragynine (10 µM) treatment resulted in sporadic early after depolarization (EAD, indicated by arrow) in hiPSC-CM paced at 0.2 Hz. (B2) Mitragynine (100 µM) treatment resulted in frequent EADs in spontaneously contracting hiPSC-CMs.

Mitragynine prolonged action potential duration in hiPSC-CMs.

(A) APs were recorded prior to and post application of 10 µM Mitragynine in ventricular-like hiPSC-CMs paced at 1 Hz. Overlay of single AP from the same cell prior to and post Mitragynine treatment (right) is presented. The table inserted below represents the AP properties. (B1) Mitragynine (10 µM) treatment resulted in sporadic early after depolarization (EAD, indicated by arrow) in hiPSC-CM paced at 0.2 Hz. (B2) Mitragynine (100 µM) treatment resulted in frequent EADs in spontaneously contracting hiPSC-CMs.

Mitragynine did not affect the L-type calcium current in hiPSC-CMs

The voltage-gated calcium current, I Ca,L is another important contributor to the APD as it contributes to the Phase 2 plateau of the cardiac AP, particularly in ventricular cardiomyocytes. I Ca,L activation has also been associated with APD prolongation and a fatal ventricular tachyarrhythmia called Torsade de Pointes (TdP). To exclude the potential effect of Mitragynine on I Ca,L that could alter APD, I Ca,L was recorded in hiPSC-CMs treated with Mitragynine. Cardiomyocytes were held at −80 mV followed by a 3 s long prepulse at −50 mV to inactivate Na+ and T-type Ca2+ channels and the recording was performed at room temperature to minimize current rundown. I Ca,L was activated by a family of 500 ms depolariztions from −50 mV to +60 mV in 10 mV increments. shows the time-course and wash out of Mitragynine. shows the I Ca,L before and after application of Mitragynine. I Ca,L was activated at–50 mV and reached a peak at approximately 0 mV. The average current-voltage curve indicated that Mitragynine (10 µM) did not statistically alter the density of I Ca,L in hiPSC-CMs (control vs. Mitragynine-treated: −8.49±2.42 pA/pF and −7.67±1.77 pA/pF, n = 6). Next, the voltage-dependent activation was evaluated by plotting normalized Ca2+ peak current. Data were fitted with Boltzmann equation. As illustrated in , under control condition, V and κ are −14.5±1.49 mV and 6.13±1.35, which were not significantly different from that of Mitragynine-treated, V =  −16.2±1.23 mV and κ  = 4.90±1.03. To measure steady-state inactivation of I Ca, L, cardiomyocytes were held between −50 mV and +10 mV for 500 ms in 10 mV increments followed by 200 ms long pulse to 10 mV. The current amplitude was normalized to the peak I Ca,L and fitted with Boltzmann equation. In , V was significantly shifted in the negative direction from −18.3±0.75 mV in controls to–21.4±0.20 mV (P<0.01) after Mitragynine treatment. The κ are 4.83±0.71 and 5.75±0.19 (P<0.05), respectively.
Figure 5

Mitragynine did not alter the L-type calcium current in hiPSC-CMs.

(A) Time-course in vehicle (left) and wash out of Mitragynine (right), n = 4. (B) Left: Representative I Ca,L traces prior to and post application of Mitragynine (10 µM). Pulse protocol is shown in the inset. Right: Averaged I-V relations for I Ca,L prior to and post Mitragynine. (C and D) Steady-state activation and inactivation curves of I Ca,L prior to and post Mitragynine treatment.

Mitragynine did not alter the L-type calcium current in hiPSC-CMs.

(A) Time-course in vehicle (left) and wash out of Mitragynine (right), n = 4. (B) Left: Representative I Ca,L traces prior to and post application of Mitragynine (10 µM). Pulse protocol is shown in the inset. Right: Averaged I-V relations for I Ca,L prior to and post Mitragynine. (C and D) Steady-state activation and inactivation curves of I Ca,L prior to and post Mitragynine treatment.

Mitragynine did not alter the expression of KCNH2/Kv11.1 in hiPSC-CMs and it did not induce apoptosis and cell death

The rapid suppression of hERG by Mitragynine (two minutes post drug application) observed in this study indicated that it was unlikely that Mitragynine achieved its effects via altering the synthesis and intracellular trafficking of Kv11.1. In addition, we carried out experiments to exclude potential subacute effect on Kv11.1 expression in hiPSC-CMs at 4 hours exposure to Mitragynine. A concentration of 10 µM of Mitragynine was adopted, which is higher than its IC50 in vitro and the maximal physiological concentration of (1.07 µM, in rats) so to allow Mitragynine to exert more remarkable effects. As shown in , the expression of KCNH2 was confirmed with human ventricular tissue as well as hiPSC-CMs. The gene expression of KCNH2 in hiPSC-CMs was not altered after Mitragynine treatment (10 µM for 4 hours). Moreover, it appeared that Mitragynine treatment neither altered the fluorescence intensity nor the intracellular localization of Kv11.1 in hiPSC-CMs ( ).
Figure 6

Mitragynine did not alter the expression of KCNH2 and Kv11.1 and the apoptosis-related genes in hiPSC-CMs.

(A) RT-PCR and real-time qPCR was performed with cDNA prepared from hiPSC-CMs prior to and 4 hours post Mitragynine (10 µM) treatment. (Top) Representative image of PCR products of KCNH2, Caspase 3, Caspase 8, Bcl2, Bax and ACTB are presented Human ventricular heart tissue cDNA was used as control. (Bottom) Relative quantity of PCR products of KCNH2, Caspase 3, Caspase 8, Bcl2, Bax measured by qPCR. (B) Caspase-3 activity measured in hiPSC-CMs treated with Mitragynine and vehicle (ethanol) for different time periods. (C) Representative images (with 3 repeats) of hiPSC-CMs immunofluorescently stained with α-actinin (green) and Kv11.1 (red) are presented. Kv11.1 staining shows similar intensity and distribution of hERG in hiPSC-CMs prior to and 4 hours post Mitragynine (10 µM) treatment. The identity of cardiomyocytes is confirmed by α-actinin staining.

Mitragynine did not alter the expression of KCNH2 and Kv11.1 and the apoptosis-related genes in hiPSC-CMs.

(A) RT-PCR and real-time qPCR was performed with cDNA prepared from hiPSC-CMs prior to and 4 hours post Mitragynine (10 µM) treatment. (Top) Representative image of PCR products of KCNH2, Caspase 3, Caspase 8, Bcl2, Bax and ACTB are presented Human ventricular heart tissue cDNA was used as control. (Bottom) Relative quantity of PCR products of KCNH2, Caspase 3, Caspase 8, Bcl2, Bax measured by qPCR. (B) Caspase-3 activity measured in hiPSC-CMs treated with Mitragynine and vehicle (ethanol) for different time periods. (C) Representative images (with 3 repeats) of hiPSC-CMs immunofluorescently stained with α-actinin (green) and Kv11.1 (red) are presented. Kv11.1 staining shows similar intensity and distribution of hERG in hiPSC-CMs prior to and 4 hours post Mitragynine (10 µM) treatment. The identity of cardiomyocytes is confirmed by α-actinin staining. Next, the potential cytotoxic effects of Mitragynine on hiPSC-CMs were assessed by measuring the expression levels of apoptotic-related genes. As shown in Top, the expressions of Caspase 3, Caspase 8, Bcl2 and Bax genes were confirmed with human ventricular tissue as well as with hiPSC-CMs by RT-PCR. Moreover, qPCR results showed that Mitragynine (10 µM, 4 hours) did not significantly alter the gene expression levels of Caspase 3, Caspase 8, Bcl2 and Bax ( Bottom). The viability of the cells treated with Mitragynine for 24 hours was examined by Trypan Blue exclusion assay and over 85% viability was observed. In addition, Caspase 3 activity measured in hiPSC-CMs treated with Mitragynine for different time periods demonstrated that there was no significant cell death after treatment ( ).

Discussion

Multiple poisoning and fatal cases involving Kratom and Mitragynine have been reported. Unfortunately the underlying causes of these adverse reactions remain unclear. Cases of severe toxicity characterized by seizure were reported on Kratom use together with modafinil and Datura stramonium. [6], [15] Drug toxicity death involving Mitragynine has been reported in Sweden in 9 cases over a 1-year time period. [16] The presence of both Mitragynine and O-desmethyltramadol (the active metabolite of tramadol) with the former between 0.05∼0.45 µ (were confirmed in postmortem blood samples. Another fatal case was also attributed to probable Kratom toxicity [23] with presence of benzodiazepines and blood level of Mitragynine at 0.60 mg/L (or 1.51 µa). Our study provides first scientific evidence of cardiotoxicity of Mitragynine. The IC50 of Mitragynine (0.91 µM) observed in our study was close to the drug concentrations measured postmortem though higher doses of Mitragynine were likely to be present in the victims’ system. However, direct evidence of fatal cardiotoxicity of Mitragynine is still lacking. This is compounded by unavailable reference ranges of Mitragynine in plasma as Kratom alkaloids or their metabolites are usually not target analytes of toxicology screening [27]. In the current study, we demonstrate that Kratom/Mitragynine exerts a cardiotoxic effect by inhibiting I Kr in hERG-HEK293 and hiPSC-CMs and increasing the APD in the latter with potential of causing TdP. Mitragynine and its analogues at low concentrations (IC50 ranging from 0.91 to 2.47µM) potently inhibited I Kr in hiPSC-CMs. The unique gating properties of hERG potassium (K+) channels play a critical role in cardiac action potential repolarization characterized by relatively slow activation and an unusually fast and voltage-dependent inactivation. Inhibition of hERG has been associated with preferential binding of drugs/reagents to open and/or inactivated states of hERG channels. [28] Our results show that Mitragynine increased the rate of inactivation and caused a marked hyperpolarizing shift in the V1/2 of steady-state inactivation. Such change could lead to reduced I Kr and prolonged APD. [29], [30] Mitragynine did not alter the activation of hERG current, suggesting that Mitragynine has a preferential binding to the inactivated state and this is the likely underlying cellular mechanism for potential QT prolongation and TdP in the toxicity of Kratom. I Ca,L is another major contributor of cardiac APD. We found that the effect of Mitragynine on I Ca,L in hiPSC-CMs is insignificant although a tendency of I Ca,L suppression by Mitragynine was noted. Reduced hERG channel protein synthesis or trafficking defect represents the alternative yet more chronic cellular mechanism of hERG inhibition and drug-induced torsadogenesis. [31], [32] Such trafficking defects would take hours to develop and thus it requires a long exposure to the drug. In this study, the immediacy of hERG inhibitory effects of Mitragynine and its analogues and the lack of alterations in the gene expression of KCNH2 and intracellular localization of Kv11.1 suggest that the tested compounds did not cause synthesis or trafficking defects of hERG. This is consistent with the reported effects of Kratom and Mitragynine beginning at 5 to 10 min after consumption and lasting for 1 h. [14] In rat models, the time to peak plasma concentration and elimination t½ of Mitragynine are 1.26 and 3.85 h, respectively [33]. At low doses, Kratom produces a stimulant effect. While at higher doses, it exhibits opioid-like effect. [12] Our data indicate that the inhibitory effect of Mitragynine on I Kr in hiPSC-CMs was independent of cytotoxic effect as there was no apparent apoptotic effect observed with treated hiPSC-CMs. Our data show that Mitragynine and its analogues exert cardiotoxicity at low concentrations as the IC50 values of the compounds for suppressing I Kr were far below their half-killing doses observed with many cells lines. Mitragynine has demonstrated half-killing doses ranging from 10.43 ∼1412.06 µM in various cell lines. For example, in neuroblastoma SK-N-SH cell line, the IC50 values was 78.90 µM. [34] In RAW 264.7 cells, it was 52.80 µM. [35] Other unpublished IC50 values include the Ishikawa cell line (10.40 µM); WRL68 cell line (103.10 µM); HepG2 cell line (20.60 µM); MCF cell line (1412.10 µM). Cardiotoxicity is one of the main reasons for drug withdrawals and it accounted for 45% of all drugs taken off the market between 1994 and 2006. [36] Cardiotoxicity is commonly characterized by prolongation of the QT interval. Many drugs that prolong QT interval block I kr, which is responsible for depolarization and contributes to the Phase 3 of the cardiac AP. Thus, current cardiotoxicity testing focuses on hERG/Kv11.1, the ion channel underlying I Kr. Suppression of hERG/Kv11.1 (I Kr) can prolong the APD and cause drug-induced LQT syndrome and fatal ventricular tachyarrhythmia or TdP and consequently sudden cardiac death. [37], [38] However, hERG is not the only ion channel that contributes to cardiac APD and accumulating evidences have shown that not all I Kr blockers cause QT prolongation or TdP in cardiomyocytes. [39] Therefore, the predictive power of the hERG assay for the torsadogenicity of a specific compound using hiPSC-CMs has great advantage over conventional non-cardiomyocyte cell model such as HEK293. While the unique value of hiPSC-CMs as in vitro drug testing model has been increasing recognized, [22] some drawbacks should be considered. First, hiPSC-CMs contain different subtypes of cardiomyocytes (mixed with V-, A-, and N-like subtypes). Second, hiPSC-CMs are immature and embryonic-like as compared to adult cardiomyocytes. Nevertheless, as the majority of hiPSC-CMs are ventricular type (∼70%), which is ideally suited for cardiotoxicity testing, their usefulness has been demonstrated in high throughput screening using automatic patch clamp technique [40]. In summary, our study using transgenic hERG-HEK293 and human cardiomyocytes indicate that Mitragynine and its analogues may induce potentially fatal TdP by suppressing hERG-mediated K+ currents and prolonging APD. Our study confirms the usefulness of human iPSC-CMs as a model in a comprehensive evaluation of cardiotoxicity of natural compounds. The I-V relations for The time-course experiment in vehicle (n = 4). (B) Averaged I-V relations for I Kr at the end of the depolarizing step. Left and middle, step and tail I Kr normalized to maximal current following repolarization to –50 mV. (TIF) Click here for additional data file. PCR Primers. hCASP3, human caspase 3. hCASP8, human caspase 8. hBcl2, human B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2. hBax, human BCL2-associated X protein. ACTB: β-actin. (DOCX) Click here for additional data file. (DOCX) Click here for additional data file. (DOCX) Click here for additional data file.
  40 in total

1.  A study of kratom eaters in Thailand.

Authors:  S Suwanlert
Journal:  Bull Narc       Date:  1975 Jul-Sep

Review 2.  Mechanisms of cardiac potassium channel trafficking.

Authors:  David F Steele; Jodene Eldstrom; David Fedida
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  HERG, a primary human ventricular target of the nonsedating antihistamine terfenadine.

Authors:  M Roy; R Dumaine; A M Brown
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Inhibition of HERG potassium channels by the antimalarial agent halofantrine.

Authors:  H Tie; B D Walker; C B Singleton; S M Valenzuela; J A Bursill; K R Wyse; S N Breit; T J Campbell
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 8.739

5.  Effect of Mitragyna speciosa aqueous extract on ethanol withdrawal symptoms in mice.

Authors:  Ekkasit Kumarnsit; Niwat Keawpradub; Watcharin Nuankaew
Journal:  Fitoterapia       Date:  2007-02-06       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 6.  The significance of mitochondrial toxicity testing in drug development.

Authors:  James A Dykens; Yvonne Will
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 7.851

7.  The inward rectification mechanism of the HERG cardiac potassium channel.

Authors:  P L Smith; T Baukrowitz; G Yellen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-02-29       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Chemistry and pharmacology of analgesic indole alkaloids from the rubiaceous plant, Mitragyna speciosa.

Authors:  Hiromitsu Takayama
Journal:  Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo)       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.645

Review 9.  QT prolongation and fatal arrhythmias: a review of clinical implications and effects of drugs.

Authors:  Luigi X Cubeddu
Journal:  Am J Ther       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.688

10.  Hydrogen sulfide suppresses outward rectifier potassium currents in human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Heming Wei; Guangqin Zhang; Suhua Qiu; Jun Lu; Jingwei Sheng; Grace Tan; Philip Wong; Shu Uin Gan; Winston Shim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  18 in total

1.  [Leukocyte count of puerperal sows].

Authors:  D Mäde; G Wujanz
Journal:  Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 0.328

2.  A reply to Henningfield, Fant & Wang (2018): regulatory action to control kratom is long overdue.

Authors:  David V Gauvin; Zachary J Zimmermann
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Cardiac arrest in a young healthy male patient secondary to kratom ingestion: is this 'legal high' substance more dangerous than initially thought ?

Authors:  Hafez Mohammad Ammar Abdullah; Iqra Haq; Randall Lamfers
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2019-07-19

4.  The inhibitory effects of mitragynine on P-glycoprotein in vitro.

Authors:  Noradliyanti Rusli; Azimah Amanah; Gurjeet Kaur; Mohd Ilham Adenan; Shaida Fariza Sulaiman; Habibah Abdul Wahab; Mei Lan Tan
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  L-Type Calcium Channel Inhibition Contributes to the Proarrhythmic Effects of Aconitine in Human Cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Jianjun Wu; Xiangchong Wang; Ying Ying Chung; Cai Hong Koh; Zhenfeng Liu; Huicai Guo; Qiang Yuan; Chuan Wang; Suwen Su; Heming Wei
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Biochemical Benefits, Diagnosis, and Clinical Risks Evaluation of Kratom.

Authors:  Dimy Fluyau; Neelambika Revadigar
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 4.157

Review 7.  Integrating cardiomyocytes from human pluripotent stem cells in safety pharmacology: has the time come?

Authors:  Luca Sala; Milena Bellin; Christine L Mummery
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Suspected Adulteration of Commercial Kratom Products with 7-Hydroxymitragynine.

Authors:  Alicia G Lydecker; Abhisheak Sharma; Christopher R McCurdy; Bonnie A Avery; Kavita M Babu; Edward W Boyer
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2016-10-17

Review 9.  Following "the Roots" of Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa): The Evolution of an Enhancer from a Traditional Use to Increase Work and Productivity in Southeast Asia to a Recreational Psychoactive Drug in Western Countries.

Authors:  Eduardo Cinosi; Giovanni Martinotti; Pierluigi Simonato; Darshan Singh; Zsolt Demetrovics; Andres Roman-Urrestarazu; Francesco Saverio Bersani; Balasingam Vicknasingam; Giulia Piazzon; Jih-Heng Li; Wen-Jing Yu; Máté Kapitány-Fövény; Judit Farkas; Massimo Di Giannantonio; Ornella Corazza
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  From basic mechanisms to clinical applications in heart protection, new players in cardiovascular diseases and cardiac theranostics: meeting report from the third international symposium on "New frontiers in cardiovascular research".

Authors:  Hector A Cabrera-Fuentes; Julian Aragones; Jürgen Bernhagen; Andreas Boening; William A Boisvert; Hans E Bøtker; Heerajnarain Bulluck; Stuart Cook; Fabio Di Lisa; Felix B Engel; Bernd Engelmann; Fulvia Ferrazzi; Péter Ferdinandy; Alan Fong; Ingrid Fleming; Erich Gnaiger; Sauri Hernández-Reséndiz; Siavash Beikoghli Kalkhoran; Moo Hyun Kim; Sandrine Lecour; Elisa A Liehn; Michael S Marber; Manuel Mayr; Tetsuji Miura; Sang-Bing Ong; Karlheinz Peter; Daniel Sedding; Manvendra K Singh; M Saadeh Suleiman; Hans J Schnittler; Rainer Schulz; Winston Shim; Daniel Tello; Carl-Wilhelm Vogel; Malcolm Walker; Qilong Oscar Yang Li; Derek M Yellon; Derek J Hausenloy; Klaus T Preissner
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 17.165

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.